Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian Estimate of the Risk of Tick-Borne Diseases

  • Published:
Applications of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers the problem of estimating the risk of a tick-borne disease in a given region. A large set of epidemiological data is evaluated, including the point pattern of collected cases, the population map and covariates, i.e. explanatory variables of geographical nature, obtained from GIS.

The methodology covers the choice of those covariates which influence the risk of infection most. Generalized linear models are used and AIC criterion yields the decision. Further, an empirical Bayesian approach is used to estimate the parameters of the risk model. Statistical properties of the estimators are investigated. Finally, a comparison with earlier results is discussed from the point of view of statistical disease mapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. G. Best, K. Ickstadt, and R. L. Wolpert Spatial Poisson regression for health and exposure data measured at disparate resolutions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95 (2000), 1076–1088.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. F. Bithell: An application of density estimation to geographical epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine 9 (1980), 691–701.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Diggle: Overview of statistical methods for disease mapping and its relationship to cluster detection. In: Spatial Epidemiology: Methods and Applications (P. Elliott et al., eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000, pp. 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Mašta: Assessment of risk of infection by means of a Bayesian method. In: Proceedings S4G International Conference on Stereology, Spatial Statistics and Stochastic Geometry (V. Beneš, J. Janáček, and I. Saxl, eds.). JČMF, Praha, 1999, pp. 197–202.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. McCullagh, J. A. Nelder: Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall, London, 1992, pp. 26–43, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Mollie, S. Richardson: Empirical Bayes estimates of cancer mortality rates using spatial models. Statistics in Medicine 10 (1991), 95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. H. Stern, N. Cressie: Inference for extremes in disease mapping. Methods of Disease Mapping and Risk Assessment for Public Health Decision Making (A. Lawson et al., eds.). Wiley, New York, 1999, pp. 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W. N. Venables, B. D. Ripley: Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. Springer, New York, 1997, pp. 242–243.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Zeman: Objective assessment of risk maps of tick-borne encephalitis and lyme borreliosis based on spatial patterns of located cases.International Journal of Epidemiology 26 (1997), 1121–1130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiruše, M., Machek, J., Beneš, V. et al. A Bayesian Estimate of the Risk of Tick-Borne Diseases. Applications of Mathematics 49, 389–404 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APOM.0000048119.55855.65

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APOM.0000048119.55855.65

Navigation