This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
American Medical Association. (1999). Screening and brief interventions for alcohol problems. Report 14 of the Council on Scientific Affairs.
Baltimore's accountability initiative enhances care, funding. (2002).Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, October 28.
Barnard, A. (2002). Radical change in doctor training needed. The Boston Globe, December 18.
Bartlett, J. (2002). Improving addiction treatment services: The need. Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, November 11.
Beilenson, Peter.(2002). Steps to success. Baltimore, MD:Baltimore Drug and Alcohol Treatment Outcomes Study.
Chilingerian, J. (2000). Evaluating quality outcomes against best practice: A new frontier In John R., Kimberly & Etienne, Minvielle(Eds.),The quality imperative: Measurement and management of quality in healthcare. London: Imperial College Press.
Executive Summary. (2001). In Crossing the quality chasm. Institute of Medicine National Academies Press.
Finney, J. W. (2002). High quality alcohol treatment/interventions systems: Empirical evidence regarding the efficacy/effectiveness of selected components. Commissioned for the Treatment Quality Policy Panel, Join Together.
Ford, W. (2000). Understanding the purchase of outcome in substance abuse treatment. National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence Committee on Benefits.
Garnick, D., Lee, M., Chalk, M., Gastfriend, D., Horgan, C., McCorry, F., McLellan, A. T., & Merrick, E. (2002). Establishing the feasibility of performance measures for alcohol and other drugs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23(4), 375-385.
Gustafson, D. (2002). Designing systems to improve addiction treatment: The foundation. Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, November 4.
Haack, M., & Adger, H.,Jr. Strategic plan for interdisciplinary faculty development: Arming the nation's health professional workforce for a new approach to substance use disorders.Available:www.amersa.org.
Higgins-Biddle, J., Babor, T., Mullahy, J., Daniels, J., & McRee, B. (1997). Alcohol screening and brief intervention:Where research meets practice. Connecticut Medicine.61(9),565-575.
Holloway, D. (2002). Improving addiction treatment services: The opportunity. Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, November 25.
Jackson, R. (2002). Treatment practice and research issues in improving opioid treatment outcomes. Science & Practice Perspectives, July.
Jenchks, S., Huff, E., &Cuerdon, T. (2003). Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998–1999 to 2000–2001. JAMA. 289(3), 305-312.
Join Together Treatment Quality Action Kit. (2002). Substance abuse Improving the quality of treatment.
Kasten, L., Larson, M. J., Brolin, M., & Manocchia, M. Wrap-around services in substance abuse treatment: Does managed care make a difference?. New England Research Institutes.
Kleiman, M. A. R. (2002). Who benefits from better drug treatment?Commissioned for the Treatment Quality Policy Panel, Join Together.
Markel, H. (2003). Tailoring treatments for teenage drug users. The New York Times, January 7.
McCarty, D. (2002). The alcohol and drug abuse treatment workforce. Frontlines.National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, November.
McCorry, F., Garnick, D., Bartlett, J., Cotter, F., & Chalk, M. (2000). Improving performance measurement for alcohol and other drug services. The Washington Circle Group and Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.
McLellan, A.T. The outcomes movement in substance abuse treatment: Comments, concerns and criticisms. In T. Sorenson, & R. Rawson(Eds.), Contemporary addiction treatment.New York, NY: Haworth Press.(in press)
McLellan, A. T., Carise, D., & Kleber, H. (2003). Can the national addiction treatment infrastructure support the public's demand for quality care? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 25(2), 117-121.
McQueen, K., & Waters, V. (2002). A call to improve services to Harris County residents affected by alcohol, tobacco, and drugs: A white paper: A white paper.Available: www.jointogether.org.
Molfenter, T. (2002). Designing organizational systems to improve treatment: The process(es). Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Weekly, November 18.
National Committee for Quality Assurance. (2003). The health plan employer data and information set (HEDIS).
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (1999). Principles of drug addiction treatment.
Quality ratings have almost no influence on consumers'choices of hospitals, health plans and physicians. (2002). Health Care News, Harris Interactive, October 11.
Ries, R., Jaffe, C., Comtois, K. A., & Kitchell, M. (1999). Treatment satisfaction compared with outcome in severe dual disorders: Abstract. Community Mental Health Journal, 35(3), 213-221.
Shafer, H., & Costikyan, N. (2002). Treatment for substance use disorders: Exploring the relationship between treatment training and treatment outcomes. Commissioned for the Treatment Quality Policy Panel, Join Together.
Simpson, D.D.Understanding drug treatment process to improve quality. Commissioned for the Treatment Quality Policy Panel, Join Together.
Szalavitz, M. (2003). Trick or treatment. Available: www.slate.com.
Author information
Consortia
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Join Together, a National Policy Panel. Rewarding Results: Improving the Quality of Treatment for People with Alcohol and Drug Problems. Adm Policy Ment Health 31, 283–312 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APIH.0000028894.55899.56
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:APIH.0000028894.55899.56