Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty and Option Value in Land Allocation Problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we are concerned with modelling techniques for evaluating development and conservation opportunities when dealing with investment decisions involving environmental resources management. In this context, highly characterized by both environmental and economic uncertainty, we emphasize the importance of capturing the flexibility of different investment strategies. In particular, we discuss a discrete model that includes both environmental and economic uncertainty treated using an integrated approach. Decision analysis techniques and option pricing theory are jointly applied to evaluate development versus conservation opportunities. In our analysis, we take into account how uncertainty interacts with two types of irreversibility: sunk costs associated with investment in developing decisions, including environmental and social costs, as well as sunk costs associated with environmental regulation and conservation. The Quasi Option Value, QOV, is used to derive decision rules that account for different levels of flexibility of land allocation possibilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albers, H. (1996). “Modeling Ecological Constraints on tropical Forest Management: Spatial Interdependence, Irreversibility and Uncertainty.” Journal of Environmental Economics 30, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. and A.C. Fisher. (1974). “Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, J.S. and C.A. Ramezani. (1998). “An Arbitrage-Free Approach to Quasi-Option Value.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 35, 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. (2000). “Wilderness: Options to Preserve, Extract, or Develop.” Resources and Energy Economics 22, 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. (1980). “Quasi-Option Value and the Expected Value of Information.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, 813–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortazar, G., E. Schwartz, and M. Salinas. (1998). “Evaluating Environmental Investments: A Real Options Approach.” Management Science 44(8), 1059–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. and R.S. Pindyck. (1994). Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. and R.S. Pindyck. (1995). “The Options Approach to Capital Investment.” Harvard Business Review, May-June.

  • Eichberger, J. and I.R. Harper. (1997). Financial Economics, chapters 3-4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K.J. et al. (1998). Conservation Science and Action, W.J. Sutherland (ed.), C.J. Bibby, Selecting Area for Conservation, chapter 9.

  • Hanemann, W.M. (1989). “Information and the Concept of Option Value.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 16, 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J.V. and A.C. Fisher.(1975). The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, C.D. (1996). “Learning, Irreversibilities and Climate.” In Proceedings of the 7th EAERE Conference, Lisbon, Portugal.

  • Merton, R.C. (1994). Continuous-Time Finance. Cambridge/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oksendal, B. and H. Yaozhong. (1998). “Optimal Time to Invest when the Price Processes are Geometric Brownian Motions.” Finance and Stochastics 2, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.S. (2000). “tIrreversibility and the Timing of Environmental Policy.” Working Paper 5, FEEM.

  • Smith, J.E. and R.F. Nau. (1995). “Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis.” Management Science 41, 795–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E and K.F. McCardle. (1998). “Valuing Oil Properties: Integrating Option Pricing and Decision Analysis Approaches.” Operations Research 46, 198–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E and K.F. McCardle. (1999). “Options in RealWorld: Lessons Learned in Evaluating Oil and Gas Investment.” Operations Research 47, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resources Allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messina, V., Bosetti, V. Uncertainty and Option Value in Land Allocation Problems. Annals of Operations Research 124, 165–181 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000004767.84402.b3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ANOR.0000004767.84402.b3

Navigation