Skip to main content
Log in

Restricted Interpolation and the Projective Beth Property in Equational Logic

  • Published:
Algebra and Logic Aims and scope

Abstract

Interconnections between syntactic and categorical properties of equational theories are established. The notions of restricted interpolation and of restricted amalgamation are introduced and their equivalence proved; interrelations of the above-mentioned properties and the projective Beth property, interpolation, and amalgamation are studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. L. Maksimova, “Intuitionistic logic and implicit definability, ” Ann. Pure Appl. Log., 105, Nos. 1–3, 83–102 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Pigozzi, “Amalgamation, congruence extension and interpolation properties in algebras. ” Alg. Univ., 1, No. 3, 269–349 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Sain, “Beth's and Craig's properties via epimorphisms and amalgamation in algebraic logic, ” in Algebraic Logic and Universal Algebra in Computer Science, Lect. Notes Comp. Sc., Vol. 425, Springer, Berlin (1990), pp. 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. L. Maksimova, “Modal logics and varieties of modal algebras: the Beth property, interpolation and amalgamation, ” Algebra Logika, 31, No. 2, 145–166 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Czelakowski and D. Pigozzi, “Amalgamation and interpolation in abstract algebraic logic, ” in Models, Algebras and Proofs, Sel. Papers X Latin Am. Symp. Math. Log. Held Bogota, Lect. Notes Pure Appl. Math., Vol. 203, Marcel Dekker, New York (1999), pp. 187–265.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Wronski, “On a form of equational interpolation property, ” in Foundations of Logic and Linguistics, Problems and Solution, Sel. Contr. 7th Int. Cong., Plenum, London (1985), pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Maksimova, “Explicit and implicit definability in modal and related logics, ” Bull. Sect. Log., Univ. Łodź, Dep. Log., 27, Nos. 1/2, 36–39 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Hoogland, “Definability and interpolation. Model-theoretic investigations, ” ILLC Dissertation Series, DS-2001–05, Amsterdam (2001).

  9. Model-Theoretic Logics, J. Barwise and S. Feferman (eds.), Springer, New York (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. D. Bacsich, “Amalgamation properties and interpolation theorems for equational theories, ” Alg. Univ., 5, No. 1, 45–55 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Jonsson, “Extensions of relational structures, ” in Theory of Models, Proc. Int. Symp., Berkeley, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1965), pp. 146–157.

  12. H. Ono, “Interpolation and the Robinson property for logics not closed under the Boolean operations, ” Alg. Univ., 23, No. 2, 111–122 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. L. L. Maksimova, “Projective Beth properties in modal and superintuitionistic logics, ” Algebra Logika, 38, No. 3, 316–333 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. Mal'tsev, Algebraic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1970).

  15. G. Grätzer and H. Lakser, “The structure of pseudocomplemented distributive lattices. II, Congruence extension and amalgamation, ” Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 156, 343–358 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Kowalski and H. Ono, “Splittings in the variety of residuated lattices, ” Alg. Univ., 44, 283–298 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maksimova, L.L. Restricted Interpolation and the Projective Beth Property in Equational Logic. Algebra and Logic 42, 398–406 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ALLO.0000004173.52981.15

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ALLO.0000004173.52981.15

Navigation