Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Building opportunities for small-farm agroforestry to supply domestic wood markets in developing countries

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fastest-growing demand for wood products is in domestic markets of developing countries. These markets could offer significant economic opportunities for hundreds of millions of small-scale agroforestry producers, in market niches where they can offer competitive advantages such as control over commercially valuable tree resources, lower cost structure, better monitoring and protection or branding for socially responsible markets. The most promising opportunities for small-scale farmers to sell high-value timber are as outgrowers for industrial buyers or by selling to intermediaries wood grown in agroforestry systems. Farmers located in forest-scarce regions near pulp mills may benefit from outgrower arrangements for pulpwood. Farmers located near inland urban markets may be competitive in some commodity wood and woodfuel markets. Opportunities in processed wood products are mainly in pre-processing, milling to supply low-end products, niches that cannot be efficiently served by industrial-scale producers, and through contracts for selected operations in vertically-integrated industries. To develop viable wood market enterprises, producers must improve their market position, strengthen their organizations, and forge strategic business partnerships. Forest market institutions must adapt by providing business services to small-scale farm producers, investing in regional forest enterprise development to fill gaps in the value chain for wood products, and targeting research, education and training. It is essential to remove policy barriers to small-farm participation in markets, by removing excessive regulations, creating fair and open competitive market environment, and involving farmers' organizations in forest policy negotiations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alavalapati J.R.R., Shrestha R.K., Stainback G.A. and Matta J.R. 2004 Agroforestry development: An environmental economics perspective (This volume).

  • ARM and Mundy J. 2000. Policy Risks for the Forest Sector Associated with the Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol. Report to Forest Trends. Washington, DC. May.

  • Arnold J.E.M., Liedholm C., Mead D. and Townson I.M. 1994. Structure and growth of small enterprises using forest products in southern and eastern Africa. OFI Occasional Paper No. 47. Oxford Forestry Institute, Oxford and GEMIN Working Paper No. 48. Growth equity through microenterprise investments and institutions. Gemini Project: Bethesda, MD, USA, 34 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASB 2001. Deregulating agroforestry timber to fight poverty and protect the environment. ASB Policy Brief No. 3. Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn Programme, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya, 4 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atyi R.E. and Simula M. 2002. Forest certification: pending challenges for tropical timber. ITTO Technical Series No. 19. International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan, 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazett M. 2000. Long-term changes in the location and structure of forest industries. Global Vision 2050 for Forestry. World Bank/World Wildlife Fund Project, Washington, DC, 23 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer J., Ibrahim M. and Schlonvoigt A. 2000. Timber production in tropical agroforestry systems of Central America. pp. 777–786. In: Krishnapillay B., Soepadmo E., Lotfy Arshad N., Wong A., Appanah S., Wan Chik S., Manokaran N., Lay Tong H. and Kean Choon K. (eds), Forests and Society: The Role of Research. Sub-plenary Session, Vol. 1, XXI IUFRO World Congress, 7–12 August 2000, Kuala Lumpur. International Union of Forest Research Organizations Secretariat, Vienna, Austria and Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colchester M., Apte T., Laforge M., Mandondo A. and Pathak N. 2003. Bridging the gap: communities, forests and international networks. CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 41. Synthesis report of the project 'Learning Lessons from International Community Forestry Networks.' Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia, 72 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Current D., Lutz E. and Scherr S.J. (eds) 1995. Costs, benefits, and farmer adoption of agroforestry: project experience in Central America and the Caribbean. World Bank Environment Paper No. 14. World Bank, Washington, DC, 212 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daley-Harris S. (ed.) 2002. Pathways out of Poverty: Innovations in Microfinance for the Poorest Families. Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT, 400 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond H. and Race D. 2000. Global survey and analytical framework for forestry out-grower arrangements. Final Report submitted to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Australian National University Forestry, Canberra, Australia, 54 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt B.R., Olivera F.G. and Correa J.L.B. 2000. Mid-term evaluation of the Mexico Community Forestry Project. World Bank, Washington, DC, 18 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewees P.A. and Saxena N.C. 1995. Wood product markets as incentives for farmer tree growing, pp. 198–241. In: Arnold J.E.M. and Dewees P.A. (eds) Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO 2003. State of the World's Forests. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 152 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO 2001. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO 1998. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • FFAQI 2000. Portable sawmills: weighing up the potential for onfarm processing. RIRDS Short Report No. 38. Forest Farmers Association of Queensland Inc., Highgate Hill, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher R.J. 2001. Poverty alleviation and forests: experiences from Asia. Regional Community Forestry Training Center for Asia and the Pacific, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford Foundation 1998. Forestry for Sustainable Rural Development. A Review of Ford Foundation-Supported Community Forestry Programs in Asia. Ford Foundation, New York, NY, 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S. and Scherr S.J. 2002. Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Africa. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 208 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S., Denning G.L., Lillesø J.P.B. and Mercado A.R. Jr. 2004. Scaling up the impact of agroforestry: Lessons from three sites in Africa and Asia (This volume).

  • Gardner-Outlaw T. and Engelman R. 1999. Forest Futures: Population, Consumption and Wood Resources. Population Action International, Washington, DC, 68 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellin J. and Higman S. 2003. Feeding the Market: South American Farmers, Trade and Globalization. Kumarian Press, Bloomfield, CT, 240 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman E. 1996. Technology and the organisation of production, processing, and marketing of non-timber forest products. p. 197–218. In: Ruiz M. Perez M. Ruiz and Arnold J.E.M. (eds). Current Issues in Non-Timber Forest Products Research. Proceedings of the Workshop 'Research on NTFP', Hot Springs, Zimbabwe, 28 August-2 September 1995. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRAF, World Agroforestry Centre 2001. Negotiation support system for natural resource conflict resolution to enhance environmental services in Southeast Asia. EAPEI proposal. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya.

    Google Scholar 

  • IIED 1996. Towards a Sustainable Paper Cycle: An Independent Study on the Sustainability of the Pulp and Paper Industry. Report prepared for the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 258 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff D. 1999. The Simple Life Guide to Tree-Free, Recycled and Certified Papers. Simplelife: Philo, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz D. 2003. Forest law enforcement and rural livelihoods. Int. For. Rev. 5(3): 199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecup I. and Nicholson K. 2000. Community-Based Tree and Forest Product Enterprises: Market Analysis and Development Field Manual. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy, 195 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie A.J. 1999. For whom the bell tolls: what is the future of the tropical timber trade in the face of a probable glut of plantation timber? In: Tropical Forest Update 9(4). Publication of the International Tropical Timber Organization, Yokohama, Japan. (Available at http://www.itto.or.jp/newsletter/v9n4/7.html).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers J. and Vermeulen S. 2002. Company-Community Forestry Partnerships: From Raw Deals to Mutual Gains? Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 176 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piñedo-Vasquez M., Zarin D1.J., Coffey K., Padoch C. and Rabelo F. 2001. Post-boom logging in Amazonia. Hum Ecol 29(2): 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger M. (ed.) 1996. Communities and forest management. A report of the IUCN Working Group on Community Involvement in Forest Management, with recommendations to the Intergovernmental Panel on Forests. IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Washington DC, 44 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poschen P. and Lougren M. 2001. Globalization and sustainability: the forestry and wood industries on the move. Report for discussion at the Tripartite Meeting on the Social and Labour Dimensions of the Forestry and Wood Industries on the Move. International Labour Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 125 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puri S. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program (this volume). Raintree J.B. and Francisco H.A. (eds) 1994. Marketing of multipurpose tree products in Asia. Proceedings of an international workshop held in Baguio City, Philippines, 6–9 December 1993. Winrock International, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins C.S. 2000. Mahogany matters: the U.S. market for bigleafed mahogany and its implications for the conservation of the species. TRAFFIC North America, Washington, DC, 58 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saigal S., Arora H. and Rizvi S. 2002. The New Foresters: The Role of Private Enterprise in the Indian Forestry Sector. Instruments for Sustainable Private Sector Forestry Series. Ecotech Services (New Delhi, India), and International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK, 192 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S.J. 1995. Meeting household needs: farmer tree-growing strategies in western Kenya, pp. 141–173. In: Arnold J.E.M. and Dewees P.A. (eds). Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr S.J., White A. and Kaimowitz D. 2003. A New Agenda for Forest Conservation and Poverty Alleviation: Making Markets Work for Low-Income Producers. Forest Trends and CIFOR, Washington, DC, 90 pp. Available at: http://www.forest-trends.org/resources/pdf/A%20New%20Agenda.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons A.J., Jaenicke H., Tchoundjeu Z., Dawson I., Kindt R., Oginosako Z., Lengkeek A. and De Grande A. 2000. The future of trees is on farm: tree domestication in Africa, pp. 752–760. In: Krishnapillay B., Soepadmo E., Lotfy Arshad N., Wong A., Appanah S., Wan Chik S., Manokaran N., Lay Tong H. and Kean Choon K. (eds). Forests and Society: The Role of Research. Sub-plenary Session, Vol. 1, XXI IUFRO World Congress, 7–12 August 2000, Kuala Lumpur. International Union of Forest Research Organizations Secretariat, Vienna, Austria and Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeraldi R. and Verissimo A. 1999. Hitting the target: timber consumption in the Brazilian domestic market and promotion of forest certification. Amigos da Terra - Programa Amazonia, São Paulo, Brazil, 41 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlosky R.P. and Aguirre J.A. 2001. Increasing marketing opportunities of lesser known wood species and secondary wood products in tropical Central America and Mexico. Louisiana Forest Products Development Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. August, 6 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • White A. and Martin A. 2002. Who Owns the World's Forests? Forest Trends, Washington, DC, 32 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. orest Trends, 1050 Potomac St., N.W., Washington, D.C, 20036, USA

    S.J. Scherr

Authors
  1. S.J. Scherr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scherr, S. Building opportunities for small-farm agroforestry to supply domestic wood markets in developing countries. Agroforestry Systems 61, 357–370 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029010.97567.2b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029010.97567.2b

Search

Navigation