Skip to main content

The enigma of tropical homegardens

Abstract

Tropical homegardens, one of the oldest forms of managed land-use systems, are considered to be an epitome of sustainability. Although these multispecies production systems have fascinated many and provided sustenance to millions, they have received relatively little scientific attention. The objective of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge on homegardens with a view to using it as a basis for improving the homegardens as well as similar agroforestry systems. Description and inventory of local systems dominated the ‘research’ efforts on homegardens during the past 25 or more years. The main attributes that have been identified as contributing to the sustainability of these systems are biophysical advantages such as efficient nutrient cycling offered by multispecies composition, conservation of bio-cultural diversity, product diversification as well as nonmarket values of products and services, and social and cultural values including the opportunity for gender equality in managing the systems. With increasing emphasis on industrial models of agricultural development, fragmentation of land holdings due to demographic pressures, and, to some extent, the neglect – or, lack of appreciation – of traditional values, questions have been raised about the future of homegardens, but such concerns seem to be unfounded. Quite to the contrary, it is increasingly being recognized that understanding the scientific principles of these multispecies systems will have much to offer in the development of sustainable agroecosystems. Research on economic valuation of the tangible as well as intangible products and services, principles and mechanisms of resource sharing in mixed plant communities, and realistic valuation and appreciation of hitherto unrecognised benefits such as carbon sequestration will provide a sound basis for formulating appropriate policies for better realization and exploitation of the benefits of homegardens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Abdoellah O.S. 1990. Homegardens in West Java and their future development. pp. 69–79. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdoellah O.S., Takeuchi K., Perikesit G.B. and Hadikusumah H.Y. 2001. Structure and function of homegarden revisited. pp. 167–185. In: Proc. First Seminar toward Harmonisation between Development and Environmental Conservation in Biological Production. JSPS-DGHE Core University Program in Applied Biosciences. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agelet A., Angels B.M., Valles J. 2000. Homegardens and their role as a main source of medicinal plants in mountain regions of Catalonia (Iberian peninsula). Econ Bot 54: 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavalapati J.R.R., Shrestha R.K., Stainback G.A. and Matta J.R. 2004. Agroforestry development: An environmental economic perspective (This volume).

  • Anderson E.N. 1993. Gardens in tropical America and tropical Asia. Biótica (nueva época) 1: 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arifin H.S., Sakamoto K. and Chiba K. 1997. Effects of the fragmentation and change of the social and economical aspects on the vegetation structure in the rural homegardens of West Java. J Jap Inst. Landscape Architect 60: 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J.E.M. 1987. Economic considerations in agroforestry. pp. 173–190. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, ICRAF, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asfaw Z. and Woldu Z. 1997. Crop associations of homegardens in Welayta and Gurage in southern Ethiopia. Sinet (an Ethiopian J Sci) 20: 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashokan P.K. and Kumar B.M. 1997. Cropping systems and their water use. pp. 200–206. In: Thampi K.B., Nayar N.M. and Nair C.S. (eds), The Natural Resources of Kerala. World Wide Fund for Nature - India, Kerala State Office, Thiruvananthapuram 14, Kerala, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backes M.M. 2001. The role of indigenous trees for the conservation of biocultural diversity in traditional Agroforestry land use systems: The Bungoma case study. Agroforest. Syst 52: 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin T.J., Montañez P.L., Jiménez J.J.M. and Gillespie A.R. 2001. Carbon, water and nutrient flux in Maya homegardens in the Yucatan peninsula of México. Agroforest Syst 53: 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black G.M., Somnasang P., Thamathawan S. and Newman J.M. 1996. Cultivating continuity and creating change: women's homegarden practices in northeastern Thailand. Multi-cultural considerations from cropping to consumption. Agriculture Human Values 13: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownrigg L. 1985. Home Gardening in International Development: What the Literature Shows. The League for International Food Education, Washington, DC, 330 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero K. 1992. Mayan homegardens: past, present and future. Etnóecolgica 1: 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron C.M. 1995. The role of nontimber tree products in household food procurement strategies: profile of a Sri Lankan village. Agroforest Syst 32: 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccolini L. 2002. The homegardens of Soqotra island, Yemen: an example of agroforestry approach to multiple land use in an isolated location. Agroforest Syst 56: 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christanty L. 1990. Homegardens in tropical Asia with special reference to Indonesia. pp. 9–20. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christanty L., Abdoellah O.L., Marten G.G. and Iskandar J. 1986. Traditional agroforestry in West Java: the Pekaranagan (homegarden) and Kebun-Talun (annual-perennial rotation) cropping systems. pp. 132–158. In: Marten G.G. (ed.), Traditional Agriculture in South East Asia. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke W.C. and Thaman R.R. (eds) 1993. Agroforestry in the Pacific Islands. United Nations University, Tokyo, 224 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clerck F.A.J. and Negreros-Castillo P. 2000. Plant species of traditional Mayan homegardens of Mexico as analogs for multistrata agroforests. Agroforest Syst 48: 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney M. and Roshetko J.M. 1999. Field test of carbon monitoring methods for homegardens in Indonesia. Field Tests of Carbon Monitoring Methods in Forestry Projects, pp. 45–51. Winrock International, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drescher A.W. 1996. Management strategies in African homegardens and the need for new extension approaches. pp. 231–245. In: Heidhues F. and Fadani A. (eds), Food Security and Innovations - Successes and Lessons Learned, Peter Lang, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dury S., Vilcosqui L. and Mary F. 1996. Durian trees (Durio zibethinus Murr.) in Javanese homegardens: their importance in informal financial systems. Agroforest Syst 33: 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel M. and Hammer K. 1992. The Cuban homegarden 'conuco': a perspective environment for evolution and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Evol 39: 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewel J.J. 1999. Natural systems as models for the design of sustainable systems of land use. Agroforest Syst 45: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassbender H. 1993 Modelos Edafológicos de Sistemas Agroforestales, 2nd Ed., CATIE/GTZ, Turrialba, 530 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes E.C.M. and Nair P.K.R. 1986. An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agr Syst 21: 279–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajaseni J. and Gajaseni N. 1999. Ecological rationalities of the traditional homegarden system in the Chao Phraya Basin, Thailand. Agroforest Syst 46: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George S.J. and Kumar B.M. 1998. Litter dynamics and soil fertility improvement in silvopastoral systems of the humid tropics of Southern India. Intl Tree Crops J 9: 267–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie A.R., Knudson D.M. and Geilfus F. 1993. The structure of four homegardens in the Peten, Guatemala. Agroforest Syst 24: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman S.R. (ed.) 1990. Integrating trees into agriculture: the homegarden agroecosystem as an example of agroforestry in the tropics. Agroecology: Researching the Ecological Basis for Sustainable Agriculture, pp. 160–168. Ecological Studies 78, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA.

  • Gopikumar K., Hegde R. and Babu L.C. 2001. Decomposition and nutrient release pattern of leaf litters of mangium (Acacia mangium Willd.) Indian J Agroforest 3: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaumet J.L., Grenand P., Bahri S., Grenand F., Lourd M., Santos A.A. dos and Gely A. 1990. The homegarden orchards of the central Amazon: an example of space utilization. Turrialba 40: 63–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal O.W., Anderson J.M. and Swift M.J. 1997. Plant litter quality and decomposition: an historical overview. pp. 3–30. In: Cadish G. and Giller K.E. (eds), Driven by Nature: Plant Quality and Decomposition, CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • High C. and Shackleton C.M. 2000. The comparative value of wild and domestic plants in homegardens of a South African rural village. Agroforest Syst 48: 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochegger K. 1998. Farming like the forest: traditional homegarden systems in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agroecology, Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim, 203 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutterer K.L. 1984. Ecology and evolution of agriculture in Southeast Asia. In: Rambo A.T. and Sajise P.E. (eds), An Introduction to Human Ecology Research on Agricultural Systems in Southeast Asia. University of Philippines, Los Banos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issac S.R. and Nair M.A. 2002. Litter decay: weight loss and N dynamics of jack leaf litter on open and shaded sites. Indian J Agrofor 4: 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob V.J. and Alles W.S. 1987. The Kandyan gardens of Sri Lanka. Agroforest Syst 5: 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. 1993a. Productivity and nutrient cycling of a Javanese homegarden. Agroforest Syst 24: 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. 1993b. Soil conditions, vegetation structure and biomass of a Javanese homegarden. Agroforest Syst 24: 171–186.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • John J. and Nair M.A. 1999. Crop-tree inventory of the homegardens in Southern Kerala. J. Trop Agric 37: 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan C.F. 1985. Nutrient Cycling in Tropical Forest Ecosystems. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 189 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jose D. and Shanmugaratnam N. 1993. Traditional homegardens of Kerala: a sustainable human ecosystem. Agroforest Syst 24: 203–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karyono 1990. Homegardens in Java; their structure and function. pp. 138–146. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehlenbeck K. and Mass B.L. 2004. Crop diversity and classification of homegardens in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst (in press).

  • Kerala State Land Use Board (KSLUB) 1995. Land Resources of Kerala State. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 209 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnankutty C.N. 1990. Demand and supply of wood in Kerala and their future trends. Research Report 67. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Kerala, 66 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B.M. and Divakara B.N. 2001. Proximity, clump size and root distribution pattern in bamboo: A case study of Bambusa arundinacea (Retz.) Willd., Poaceae, in the Ultisols of Kerala, India. J Bamboo and Rattan 1: 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B.M., George S.J., Jamaludheen V. and Suresh T.K. 1998. Comparison of biomass production, tree allometry and nutrient use efficiency of multipurpose trees grown in wood lot and silvopastoral experiments in Kerala, India. Forest Ecol Manag 112: 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar B.M, George S.J. and Chinnamani S. 1994. Diversity, structure and standing stock of wood in the homegardens of Kerala in peninsular India. Agroforest Syst 25: 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S.S., Kumar B.M., Wahid P.A., Kamalam N.V. and Fisher R.F. 1999. Root competition for phosphorus between coconut, multipurpose trees and kacholam (Kaempferia galanga) in Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst 46: 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds) 1990. Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, 257 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle P., Blanchart E., Martin A., Martin S., Spain A., Toutain F., Barois I. and Schaefer R. 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica 25: 130–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leith H. 1975. Primary production of major vegetation units of the world. pp. 203–215. In: Leith H. and Whittaker R.H. (eds), Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiva J.M., Azurdia C., Ovando W., López E. and Ayala H. 2002. Contributions of homegardens to in situ conservation in traditional farming systems-Guatemalan component. pp. 56–72. In: Watson J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds), Homegardens and In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. Proc Second International Homegarden Workshop, 17–19 July 2001. Witzenhausen, Germany, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuschner W.A. and Khaleque K. 1987. Homestead Agroforestry in Bangladesh. Agroforest Syst 5: 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levasseur V. and Olivier A. 2000. The farming system and traditional agroforestry systems in the Maya community of San Jose, Belize. Agroforest Syst 49: 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew T., Kumar B.M., Suresh Babu K.V. and Umamaheswaran K. 1996. Evaluation of some live standards for black pepper. J Plant Crops 24: 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez V.E., Lok R., Somarriba E. 2001. Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro-zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance. Agroforest Syst 51: 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon T.M., Tyagi D. and Kulirani B.F. (eds) 2002. People of India: Kerala: Volume XXVII. Affiliated East-West Press for Anthropological Survey of India, New Delhi, 1704 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G. and deForesta H. 1999. Agro-Forests: Incorporating a forest vision in agroforestry. pp. 381–406. In: Buck L.E., Lassoie J.P. and Fernandes E.C.M. (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G. and Mary F. 1990. Transforming traditional homegardens and related systems in West java (Bogor) and West Sumatra (Maninjau). pp. 169–185. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G. and Mary F. 1994. Conversion of traditional village gardens and new economic strategies of rural households in the area of Bogor, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst 25: 31–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michon G., Bompard J., Hecketsweiler P. and Ducatillion C. 1983. Tropical forest architectural analysis applied to agroforests in the humid tropics, the example of traditional village agroforestry in West Java. Agroforest Syst 1: 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millat-e-Mustafa M.D., Hall J.B., Teklehaimanot Z. 1996. Structure and floristics of Bangladesh homegardens. Agroforest Syst 33: 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina M.R., Noguera A., Dary O., Chew F., Valverde C. 1993. Principal micronutrient deficiencies in Central America. Food Nutr Agric 7: 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Carbon sequestration: An underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems (This volume).

  • Mpoyi K., Lukebakio N., Kapende K. and Paulus J. 1994. Inventaire de la flore domestique des parcelles d'habitation. Cas de Kinshasa (Zaire). Revue de Medecine et Pharmacopee Africaine 8: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muschler R.G. 2001. Shade improves coffee quality in a suboptimal coffee-zone of Costa Rica. Agroforest Syst 51: 131–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair M.A. and Sreedharan C. 1986. Agroforestry farming systems the homesteads of Kerala, southern India. Agroforest Syst 4: 339–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. 1979. Intensive Multiple Cropping with Coconuts in India: Principles, Programmes and Prospects. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin, 147 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. 1987. Agroforestry systems inventory. Agroforest Syst 5: 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. (ed.) 1989. Agroforestry Systems in the Tropics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 664 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. 1993. An Introduction to Agroforestry. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 499 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R. 2001. Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around? Agroforest Syst 53: 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nair P.K.R., Buresh R.J., Mugendi D.N. and Latt C.R. 1999. Nutrient cycling in tropical agroforesty systems: Myths and science. pp. 1–31. In: Buck L.E., Lassoie J.P. and Fernandes E.C.M. (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niñez V.K. 1987. Household gardens: theoretical and policy considerations. Agr Syst 23: 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 24–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson J.S. 1963. Energy storage and balance of production and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology 44: 322–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padoch C. and de Jong W. 1991. The housegardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an Amazonian agricultural system. Econ Bot 45: 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm C.A., Gachengo C.N., Delve R.J., Cadisch G. and Giller K.E. 2001. Organic inputs for soil fertility management in tropical agroecosystems: application of an organic resource database. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83: 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri S. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. Agroforestry research for development in India: 25 years of experiences of a national program (This volume).

  • Quiroz C., Gutiérrez M., Rodriguez D., Perz D., Ynfante J., Gamex J., Perz de Fernandex T., Marques A. and Pacheco W. 2002. Homegardens and in situ conservation of Agrobiodiversity - Venezuelan component. pp. 73–82. In: Watson J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds), Homegardens and in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. Proc Second International Homegarden Workshop, 17–19 July 2001 Witzenhausen, Germany. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao M.R., Palada M.C. and Becker B.N. 2004. Medicinal and aromatic plants in agroforestry systems (This volume).

  • Rico-Gray V., Chemas A. and Mandujano S. 1991. Use of tropical deciduous forest species by the Yucatan Maya. Agroforest Syst 14: 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Gray V., Garcia F.J.G., Chemas A., Puch A. and Sima P. 1990. Species composition, similarity, and structure of Mayan homegardens in Tixpeual and Tixcacaltuyub, Yucatan, Mexico. Econ Bot 44: 470–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshetko M., Delaney M., Hairiah K. and Purnomosidhi P. 2002. Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: Can small-holder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? Amer J Altern Agric 17: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugalema G.H., O'Kting' Ati A., Johnsen F.H. 1994a. The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba district, North-Western Tanzania. Farming system analysis. Agroforest Syst 26: 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugalema G.H., Johnsen F.H., Rugambisa J. 1994b. The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba district, North-Western Tanzania. 2. Constraints to farm productivity. Agroforest Syst 26: 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugalema G.H., Johnsen F.H., O'Kting' Ati A., Minjas A. 1995. The homegarden agroforestry system of Bukoba district, northwestern Tanzania. An economic appraisal of possible solutions to falling productivity. Agroforest Syst 28: 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthenberg H. 1980. Farming Systems in the Tropics (3rd ed.) Clarendon Press, Oxford, 424 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanavas A. and Kumar B.M. 2003 Fuelwood characteristics of tree species in the homegardens of Kerala, India. Agroforest Syst 58: 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shankar A.V., Gittelsohn J., Pradhan E.K., Dhungel C. and West K.P. Jr. 1998. Homegardening and access to animals in house-holds with xerophthalmic children in rural Nepal. Food Nut Bull 19: 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shujauddin N. and Kumar B.M. 2003. Ailanthus triphysa at different densities and fertilizer regimes in Kerala, India: Biomass productivity, nutrient export and nutrient use efficiency. Forest Ecol Manag 180: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G.B. 1987. Agroforestry in the Indian subcontinent: past, present and future. pp. 117–138. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soemarwoto O. 1987. Homegardens: A traditional agroforestry system with a promising future. pp. 157–170. In: Steppler H.A. and Nair P.K.R. (eds), Agroforestry: A Decade of Development, ICRAF, Nairobi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soemarwoto O. and Conway G.R. 1991. The Javanese homegarden. J Farming Syst Res Extn 2: 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terra G.J.A. 1953. Mixed-garden horticulture in Java. Malayan J Trop Geogr 1: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terra G.J.A. 1958. Farm systems in southeast Asia. Neth J Agric Sci 6: 157–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaman R.R. 1990. Mixed homegardening in the Pacific Islands: present status and future prospects. pp. 41–65. In: Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds), Tropical Homegardens, United Nations University Press, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torquebiau E. 1992. Are tropical agroforestry homegardens sustainable? Agric Ecosyst Environ 41: 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek P.M. and Reiners W.A. 1975. Ecosystems succession and nutrient retention: a hypothesis. BioScience 25: 376–381.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogl C.R., Vogl-Lukraser B. and Caballero J. 2002. Homegardens of Maya Migrants in the district of Palenque, Chiapas, Mexcio: Implications for Sustainable Rural Development. pp. 1–12. In: Stepp J.R., Wyndham F.S. and Zarger R.K. (eds), Ethnobiology and Biocultural Diversity, University of Georgia Press, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson J.W. and Eyzaguirre P.B. (eds) 2002. Homegardens and in situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources in Farming Systems. Proc Second International Homegarden Workshop, 17–19 July 2001. Witzenhausen, Germany; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 184 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezel A. and Bender S. 2003. Plant species diversity of home-gardens of Cuba and its significance for household food supply. Agroforest Syst 57: 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitten T., Soeriaatmadja R.E. and Afiff S.A. 1996. The Ecology of Java and Bali. The ecology of Indonesia series 2, Perplus Edition, Jakarta, 969 pp.

  • Wichern F., Richter C. and Joergensen R.G. 2003. Soil fertility breakdown in a subtropical South African vertisol site used as a homegarden. Biol Fertil Soils 37: 288–294.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wickramasinghe A. 1996. The non forest wood fuel resources of Sri Lanka. Wood Energy News 11: 14–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum K.F. 1982. Tree gardening and taungya on Java. Agroforest Syst 1: 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum K.F. 2004. Forest Gardens as an 'Intermediate' Land-use System in the Nature-Culture Continuum: Characteristics and Future Potential (This volume).

  • Yamada M. and Gholz H.L. 2002. An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforest Syst 55: 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto Y., Kubota N., Ogo T. and Priyono1991. Changes in the structure of homegardens under different climatic conditions in Java Island. Japanese J Trop Agric 35: 104–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemede A. and Ayele N. 1995. Homegardens in Ethiopia: characteristics and plant diversity. Sinet (an Ethiopian J Sci) 18: 235–266.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, B., Nair, P. The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agroforestry Systems 61, 135–152 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028995.13227.ca

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028995.13227.ca

  • Carbon sequestration
  • Integrated farming systems
  • Multispecies systems
  • Species diversity
  • Species inventory
  • Sustainability