Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of joint and endogenous technology choice for protein supplementation by smallholder dairy farmers in Zimbabwe

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Survey data on observed choices of protein feed supplements by smallholder dairy farmers in Chikwaka communal area of Zimbabwe were analyzed for factors affecting use of a specific agroforesty practice. The observed protein supplementation choices included multipurpose tree [MPT] fodder and purchased concentrates. These supplements were used mostly in combination and were thus considered jointly by multivariate probit analysis. The results indicated significant positive correlation suggesting joint use of the two protein supplements by these smallholder dairy farmers. Significant correlations also indicated that relative specialization in the dairy enterprise, where milk revenue is cited as the primary income source, is an endogenous factor in the choice of both protein supplements by farmers. Multinomial logit analysis was also applied to determine significant explanatory factors in supplement choice. It was found that dependence on off-farm wages, cropping season labor constraints and receipt of crop revenue as the primary income source each significantly reduced the probability of using both purchased concentrates and multipurpose tree fodder. The probability of using multipurpose tree fodder alone was reduced by relatively fewer years of experience in the dairy industry and in growing MPT fodder trees, but increased by having greater areas planted. Overall, continued use of MPT fodder and the potential of this technology to substitute for purchased concentrates appeared to be dependent on the ability to generate income from milk production and fodder yields from the technology in the short-term, and the learning curve with fodder tree growing in the long-term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Akiva M.E. and Lerman S.R. 1985. Binary choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand. MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell M.F. and Zilberman D. 1985. The choices of irrigation technologies in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67: 224–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clatsworthy J.N. 1987. Feed resources of small-scale livestock producers in Zimbabwe. In: Kategile J.A., Said A.N. and Dzowela B.H. (eds), Animal feed resources for small scale livestock producers, International Development Research Center, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman J.H. 1996. Modeling multiple adoption decisions in a joint framework. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(August): 547–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dube L. 1995. An economic analysis of smallholder dairy farming in Zimbabwe. Unpublished MSc. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzowela B.H. and Mafongoya P.L. 1997. On-farm fodder bank research in Zimbabwe: results and recommendations from three years experience (1994-1997). ICRAF, Harare, Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Osta H.S. and Morehart M.J. 1999. Technology adoption decisions in dairy production and the role of herd expansion. Agricultural and Resource Economics (April): 84-95.

  • Feder G.R., Just E. and Zilberman D. 1981. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33 (2): 255–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis J. 1993. Effects of strategic supplementation on work performance and physiological parameters of Mashona oxen. Unpublished M.Phil. Thesis, Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzel S. 1999. Socioeconomic factors affecting the adoption potential of improved tree fallows in Africa. Agroforestry Systems 47: 305–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene W.H. 2000. Econometric analysis. 4th Edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene W.H. 1995. LIMDEP version 7.0 user manual. Econometrics Software Inc., New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z. 1957. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25 (October): 501-22.

  • Hanemann M.W. and Kanninen B. 1996. The statistical analysis of discrete response CV data. Working Paper No. 798. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman W.E. 1974. Decision making: the role of education. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56: 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajivassiliou V. 1993. Simulation estimation methods for limited dependent variable models. In: Maddala G.S., Rao C.R. and Vinod D. (eds), Handbook of Statistics Volume 11, Econometrics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 519–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D. 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York, USA, pp. 105–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mupeta B. 1995. The potential development of communal areas for dairy production. A paper prepared for the technical program for Dairy Development Program-ARDA, Henderson Research Station, Mazowe, Zimbabwe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannel D.J. 1999. Social and economic challenges in the development of complex farming systems. Agroforestry Systems 45: 393–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauniyar G.P. and Goode F.M. 1992. Technology adoption on small farms. World Development 20 (February): 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. 1999. SPSS Base 9.0 applications guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski M. and Colletti J. 1999. Combining the socioeconomic-cultural implications of community owned agroforestry: The Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska. Agroforestry Systems 44: 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Train K. 1986. Qualitative choice analysis: theory, econometrics and an application to automobile demand. MIT Press, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda L. 1994. Simultaneity of technology adoption and productivity. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19 (1): 46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepeda L. 1990. Adoption of capital versus management intensive technologies. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 38 (1990): 457–469.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Moyo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moyo, S., Veeman, M. Analysis of joint and endogenous technology choice for protein supplementation by smallholder dairy farmers in Zimbabwe. Agroforestry Systems 60, 199–209 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000024413.12439.ec

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000024413.12439.ec

Navigation