Skip to main content
Log in

The Mouse Aorta Model: Influence of Genetic Background and Aging on bFGF- and VEGF-Induced Angiogenic Sprouting

  • Published:
Angiogenesis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Angiogenesis can be studied ex vivo by culturing rat or mouse aortic rings in collagen gels. Unlike rat aorta explants, unstimulated mouse aortic rings were unable to spontaneously produce an angiogenic response under serum-free conditions. They, however, responded to bFGF and VEGF, generating networks of branching neovessels. Aortic rings from GFP-Tie2-transgenic mice generated GFP-labeled neovessels that could be easily identified by their distinctly green fluorescence. Aortic rings from 1- to 2-month-old mice produced microvessels faster, more uniformly and in greater number than aortic rings from 6- to 10-month-old mice, particularly in VEGF-treated cultures. Aortic rings from 129/SVJ mice were capable of a much stronger and sustained angiogenic response to bFGF than those of C57BL/6 or BALB/c mice, which were in turn more angiogenic than aortic rings from FVB mice. The same strains of mice responded differently to VEGF, as C57BL/6 mouse aortic rings produced more microvessels than those of BALB/c, FVB, and 129/SVJ mice, which were capable of only a limited response. The significant impact that aging and genetic background have on mouse aortic angiogenesis should be taken into account when the aortic-ring assay is used to evaluate function of genes that have been deleted or overexpressed in genetically modified mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicosia RF, Ottinetti A. Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro. Lab Invest 1990; 63: 115–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaggers DC, Collins WP, Milligan SR. Potent inhibitory effects of steroids in an in vitro model of angiogenesis. J Endocrinol 1996; 150: 457–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Malinda KM, Nomizu M, ChungMet al. Identification of laminin alpha1 and beta1 chain peptides active for endothelial cell adhesion, tube formation, and aortic sprouting. FASEB J 1999; 13: 53–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang L, Sankar S, Lin C et al. HCPTPA, a protein tyrosine phosphatase that regulates vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-mediated signal transduction and biological activity. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 38183–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Blacher S, Devy L, Burbridge MF et al. Improved quantification of angiogenesis in the rat aortic ring assay. Angiogenesis 2001; 4: 133–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kruger EA, Duray PH, Price DK et al. Approaches to preclinical screening of antiangiogenic agents. Semin Oncol 2001; 28: 570–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicosia RF, Ottinetti A. Modulation of microvascular growth and morphogenesis by reconstituted basement membrane gel in threedimensional cultures of rat aorta: A comparative study of angiogenesis in matrigel, collagen, fibrin, and plasma clot. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 1990; 26: 119–28.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Villaschi S, Nicosia RF. Angiogenic role of endogenous basic fibroblast growth factor released by rat aorta after injury. Am J Pathol 1993; 143: 181–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicosia RF, Nicosia SV, Smith M. Vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1 promote rat aortic angiogenesis in vitro. Am J Pathol 1994; 145: 1023–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu WH, Guo X, Villaschi S et al. Regulation of vascular growth and regression by matrix metalloproteinases in the rat aorta model of angiogenesis. Lab Invest 2000; 80: 545–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sato TN. Gene trap, gene knockout, gene knock-in, and transgenics in vascular development. Thromb Haemost 1999; 82: 865–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen-Tannoudji M, Babinet C. Beyond ‘knock-out’ mice: New perspectives for the programmed modification of the mammalian genome. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4: 929–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanahan D, Christofori G, Naik P et al. Transgenic mouse models of tumour angiogenesis: The angiogenic switch, its molecular controls, and prospects for preclinical therapeutic models. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A: 2386–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carmeliet P, Moons L, Collen D. Mouse models of angiogenesis, arterial stenosis, atherosclerosis and hemostasis. Cardiovasc Res 1998; 39: 8–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Laird AD, Christensen JG, Li G et al. SU6668 inhibits Flk-1/KDR and PDGFRβ in vivo, resulting in rapid apoptosis of tumor vasculature and tumor regression in mice. FASEB J 2002; 16: 681–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Olson KA, Byers HR, Key ME et al. Inhibition of prostate carcinoma establishment and metastatic growth in mice by an antiangiogenin monoclonal antibody. Int J Cancer 2002; 98: 923–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akimoto T, Liapis H, Hammerman MR. Microvessel formation from mouse embryonic aortic explants is oxygen and VEGF dependent. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2002; 283: R487–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson V Ve, Devy L, Grignet-Debrus C et al. Mouse aortic ring assay: A new approach of the molecular genetics of angiogenesis. Biol Proceed Online 2002; 4: 24–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu WH, Nicosia RF. The thin prep rat aortic ring assay: A modified method for the characterization of angiogenesis in whole mounts. Angiogenesis 2002; 5: 81–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Elsdale T, Bard J. Collagen substrata for studies on cell behavior. J Cell Biol 1972; 54: 626–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Thurston G, Murphy TJ, Baluk P et al. Angiogenesis in mice with chronic airway inflammation: Strain-dependent differences. Am J Pathol 1998; 153: 1099–112.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rohan RM, Fernandez A, Udagawa T et al. Genetic heterogeneity of angiogenesis in mice. FASEB J 2000; 14: 871–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Swift ME, Kleinman HK, DiPietro LA. Impaired wound repair and delayed angiogenesis in aged mice. Lab Invest 1999; 79: 1479–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hood JD, Frausto R, Kiosses WB et al. Differential αv integrinmediated Ras-ERK signaling during two pathways of angiogenesis. J Cell Biol 2003; 162: 933–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rivard A, Fabre JE, Silver M et al. Age-dependent impairment of angiogenesis. Circulation 1999; 99: 111–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Devy L, Blacher S, Grignet-Debrus C et al. The pro-or antiangiogenic effect of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 is dose dependent. FASEB J 2002; 16: 147–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kato T, Kure T, Chang JH et al. Diminished corneal angiogenesis in gelatinase a-deficient mice. FEBS Lett 2001; 508: 187–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto F. Nicosia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhu, WH., Iurlaro, M., MacIntyre, A. et al. The Mouse Aorta Model: Influence of Genetic Background and Aging on bFGF- and VEGF-Induced Angiogenic Sprouting. Angiogenesis 6, 193–199 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGEN.0000021397.18713.9c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGEN.0000021397.18713.9c

Navigation