Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome of apparent ureteropelvic junction obstruction identified by investigation of fetal hydronephrosis

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was toevaluate the outcome of prenatally detectedureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)managed with a more conservative protocol.Methods: The records and imaging studies of 77consecutive neonates with UPJO identified by fetal hydronephrosis werereviewed. A nonoperative approach wasattempted in patients with mild/moderate pelvicdilatation, renal units with good functionas ascertained by DMSA scan and anon-obstructed pattern on DTPA. Otherwise, thepatients were managed surgically bypyeloplasty. Both groups were prospectivelyfollowed and the imaging studies were performedbefore and after the initial approachand at one-year intervals thereafter.Results: Of the 77 infants (85 units), 39 weresubmitted to surgery (33 pyeloplasty and 7 nephrectomy) and 38 were conservativelymanaged. During follow-up, 9 (24%) of 38 patients in the non-operative group presentedrenal function deterioration and 3 presented with urinary infections and were submitted topyeloplasty. Of the 39 patients surgically managed, 76% presented improvement ofhydronephrosis and 90% showed a non-obstructed pattern on diuretic renography. Thedifferential renal uptake, as measured by DMSA scan, remained stable in the three groupsanalyzed (conservative, initial pyeloplasty, and delayed pyeloplasty). Therewas a minimal improvement in those units submitted to pyeloplasty with impairedrenal function at baseline (< 40%). Mean renal uptake was 28.6% at admission and33.9% at the end of follow-up. Conclusion: There was a wide spectrum ofureteropelvic junction stenosis. Surgical intervention in a subgroup of patients withsevere hydronephrosis and impaired function may possibly improve or preserve renalparenchyma. Conversely, conservative management and clinical follow-up are safe anddesirable for the subgroup with mild/moderate pelvic dilatation and preservedrenal function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blachar A, Blachar Y, Livne PM, Zurkowski L, Pelet D, Mogilner B. Clinical outcome and follow-up of prenatal hydronephrosis. Pediatr Nephrol 1994; 8: 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tam JC, Hodson EM, Choong KK et al. Postnatal diagnosis and outcome of urinary tract abnormalities detected by antenatal ultrasound. Med J Aust 1994; 160: 633–637.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gloor JM, Ogburn PL, Jr., Breckle RJ et al. Urinary tract anomalies detected by prenatal ultrasound examination at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Mayo Clin Proc 1995; 70: 526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Owen RJ, Lamont AC, Brookes J. Early management and postnatal investigation of prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis. Clin Radiol 1996; 51: 173–176.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dowling KJ, Harmon EP, Ortenberg J et al. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the effect of pyeloplasty on renal function. J Urol 1988; 140: 1227–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gonzalez R, Schimke CM. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48: 1505–1518.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tripp BM, Homsy YL. Neonatal hydronephrosis – the controversy and the management. Pediatr Nephrol 1995; 9: 503–509.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ransley PG, Manzoni GA. Extended role of DTPA scan in assessing function and PUJ obstruction in neonates. Dialog Pediatr Urol 1985; 8: 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oliveira EA, Diniz JS, Cabral AC et al. Prognostic factors in fetal hydronephrosis: a multivariate analysis. Pediatr Nephrol 1999; 13: 859–864.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23: 478–480.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Konda R, Sakai K, Ota S et al. Ultrasound grade of hydronephrosis and severity of renal cortical damage on 99m technetium dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan in infants with unilateral hydronephrosis during followup and after pyeloplasty. J Urol 2002; 167: 2159–2163.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dean AG, Dean JA, Coulombier D et al. Epi Info, Version 6: a word processing, database, and statistics program for epidemiology on microcomputers. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A. 1994.

  13. Tapia J, Gonzalez R. Pyeloplasty improves renal function and somatic growth in children with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1995; 154: 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ransley PG, Dhillon HK, Gordon I et al. The postnatal management of hydronephrosis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound. J Urol 1990; 144: 584–587.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Madden NP, Thomas DF, Gordon AC et al. Antenatally detected pelviureteric junction obstruction. Is non-operation safe? Br J Urol 1991; 68: 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ulman I, Jayanthi VR, Koff SA. The long-term followup of newborns with severe unilateral hydronephrosis initially treated nonoperatively. J Urol 2000; 164: 1101–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Takla NV, Hamilton BD, Cartwright PC, Snow BW. Apparent unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction in the newborn: expectations for resolution. J Urol 1998; 160: 2175–2178.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Palmer LS, Maizels M, Cartwright PC et al. Surgery versus observation for managing obstructive grade 3 to 4 unilateral hydronephrosis: a report from the Society for Fetal Urology. J Urol 1998; 159: 222–228.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dhillon HK. Prenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: the Great Ormond Street experience. Br J Urol 1998; 81(S2): 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hanna MK. Antenatal hydronephrosis and ureteropelvic junction obstruction: the case for early intervention. Urology 2000; 55: 612–615.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Subramaniam R, Kouriefs C, Dickson AP. Antenatally detected pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction: concerns about conservative management. Br J Urol Int 1999; 84: 335–338.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Houben CH, Wischermann A, Borner G, Slany E. Outcome analysis of pyeloplasty in infants. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16: 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MacNeily AE, Maizels M, Kaplan WE et al. Does early pyeloplasty really avert loss of renal function? A retrospective review. J Urol 1993; 150: 769–773.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Capolicchio G, Leonard MP, Wong C et al. Prenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: impact on renal function and its recovery after pyeloplasty. J Urol 1999; 162: 1029–1032.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bassiouny IE. Salvage pyeloplasty in nonvisualizing hydronephrotic kidney secondary to ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 1992; 148: 685–687.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shokeir AA, Provoost AP, Nijman RJ. Recoverability of renal function after relief of chronic partial upper urinary tract obstruction. Br J Urol Int 1999; 83: 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Groshar D, Wald M, Moskovitz B et al. Quantitative SPECT of 99mTc-DMSA uptake in kidneys of infants with unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction: assessment of structural and functional abnormalities. J Nucl Med 1999; 40: 1111–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kalika V, Bard RH, Iloreta A et al. Prediction of renal functional recovery after relief of upper urinary tract obstruction. J Urol 1981; 126: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo A. Oliveira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apocalypse, G.T., Oliveira, E.A., Rabelo, E.A. et al. Outcome of apparent ureteropelvic junction obstruction identified by investigation of fetal hydronephrosis. Int Urol Nephrol 35, 441–448 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UROL.0000025621.93025.3d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:UROL.0000025621.93025.3d

Navigation