Transport in Porous Media

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 47–70 | Cite as

Analytical Solution to the Riemann Problem of Three-Phase Flow in Porous Media

  • Ruben Juanes
  • Tadeusz W. Patzek


In this paper we study one-dimensional three-phase flow through porous media of immiscible, incompressible fluids. The model uses the common multiphase flow extension of Darcy’s equation, and does not include gravity and capillarity effects. Under these conditions, the mathematical problem reduces to a 2 × 2 system of conservation laws whose essential features are: (1) the system is strictly hyperbolic; (2) both characteristic fields are nongenuinely nonlinear, with single, connected inflection loci. These properties, which are natural extensions of the two-phase flow model, ensure that the solution is physically sensible. We present the complete analytical solution to the Riemann problem (constant initial and injected states) in detail, and describe the characteristic waves that may arise, concluding that only nine combinations of rarefactions, shocks and rarefaction-shocks are possible. We demonstrate that assuming the saturation paths of the solution are straight lines may result in inaccurate predictions for some realistic systems. Efficient algorithms for computing the exact solution are also given, making the analytical developments presented here readily applicable to interpretation of lab displacement experiments, and implementation of streamline simulators.

three-phase flow conservation laws Buckley–Leverett hyperbolic system waves entropy solution 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al-Futaisi, A. and Patzek, T. W.: 2003, Impact of oil–water drainage and imbibition on subsequent gas injection: A three-phase pore network model, Phys. Rev. E, Accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  2. Ancona, F. and Marson, A.: 2001, A note on the Riemann problem for general n × n conservation laws, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 260, 279–293.Google Scholar
  3. Barenblatt, G. I., Entov, V. M. and Ryzhik, V. M.: 1990, Theory of Fluid Flows through Natural Rocks. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Expanded and revised edition of the original in Russian Dvizhenie zhidkostei i gazov v prirodnykh plastakh, Nedra Publishers, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. Batycky, R. P., Blunt, M. J. and Thiele, M. R.: 1997, A 3D field-scale streamline-based reservoir simulator, SPE Reserv. Eng. 11(4), 246–254.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, J. B., Trangenstein, J. A. and Shubin, G. R.: 1986, Conservation laws of mixed type describing three-phase flow in porous media, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 46(6), 1000–1017.Google Scholar
  6. Charny, I. A.: 1963, Subterranean Hydro-Gas Dynamics, Gostoptekhizdat, Moscow (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Chavent, G. and Jaffré, J.: 1986, Mathematical Models and Finite Elements for Reservoir Simulation. Elsevier, North-Holland.Google Scholar
  8. Falls, A. H. and Schulte, W. M.: 1992a, Features of three component, three phase displacement in porous media, SPE Reserv. Eng. 7(4), 426–432.Google Scholar
  9. Falls, A. H. and Schulte, W. M.: 1992b, Theory of three component, three phase displacement in porous media, SPE Reserv. Eng. 7(3), 377–384.Google Scholar
  10. Fayers, F. J.: 1987, Extension of Stone's method I and conditions for real characteristics in threephase flow, in: Proc. of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX (SPE 16965).Google Scholar
  11. Guzmán, R. E. and Fayers, F. J.: 1997a, Mathematical properties of three-phase flow equations, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 2(3), 291–300.Google Scholar
  12. Guzmán, R. E. and Fayers, F. J.: 1997b, Solution to the three-phase Buckley–Leverett problem, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 2(3), 301–311.Google Scholar
  13. Guzmán, R. E., Domenico, G., Fayers, F. J., Aziz, K. and Godi, A.: 1994, Three-phase flow in field scale simulations of gas and WAG injections, in: SPE European Petroleum Conference, London, UK (Proc. of the SPE 28897).Google Scholar
  14. Helfferich, F. G.: 1981, Theory of multicomponent, multiphase displacement in porous media, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 21(1), 51–62. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 271.Google Scholar
  15. Helfferich, F. and Klein, G.: 1970, Multicomponent Chromatography. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Hicks Jr., P. J. and Grader, A. S.: 1996, Simulation of three-phase displacement experiments, Transp. Porous Media 24, 221–245.Google Scholar
  17. Holden, L.: 1990, On the strict hyperbolicity of the Buckley–Leverett equations for three-phase flow in a porous medium, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50(3), 667–682.Google Scholar
  18. Juanes, R.: 2003, Displacement theory and multiscale numerical modeling of three-phase flow in porous media, PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
  19. Juanes, R. and Patzek, T. W.: 2002, Relative permeabilities for strictly hyperbolic models of threephase flow in porous media, Transp. Porous Media., submitted for publication. Also available as Report LBNL-51442, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  20. Keyfitz, B. L. and Shearer, M. (eds): 1990, Nonlinear Evolution Equations that Change Type, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Kyte, J. R., Stanclift Jr., R. J., Stephen Jr., S. C. and Rapoport, L. A.: 1956, Mechanism of water flooding in the presence of free gas. Petrol. Trans. AIME 207, 215–221.Google Scholar
  22. Lax, P. D.: 1957, Hyperbolic system of conservation laws, II, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 537–566.Google Scholar
  23. LeVeque, R. J.: 1992, Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws, 2nd edn, Birkhäuser, Berlin.Google Scholar
  24. Lindquist, W. B. (ed.): 1989, Current progress in Hyperbolic systems: Riemann Problems and Computations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, T.-P.: 1974, The Riemann problem for general 2 × 2 conservation laws, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 199, 89–112.Google Scholar
  26. Marchesin, D. and Plohr, B. J.: 2001, Wave structure in WAG recovery, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 6(2), 209–219.Google Scholar
  27. Muskat, M.: 1949, Physical Principles of Oil Production, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Oak, M. J., Baker, L. E. and Thomas, D. C.: 1990, Three-phase relative permeability of Berea sandstone, J. Pet. Technol. 42(8), 1054–1061.Google Scholar
  29. Parker, J. C., Lenhard, R. J. and Kuppusamy, T.: 1987, A parametric model for constitutive properties governing multiphase flow in porous media, Water Resour. Res. 23(4), 618–624.Google Scholar
  30. Pope, G. A.: 1980, The application of fractional flow theory to enhanced oil recovery, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 20(3), 191–205. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 269.Google Scholar
  31. Rhee, H.-K., Aris, R. and Amundson, N. R.: 1989, First-Order Partial Differential Equations, Theory and Application of Hyperbolic Systems of Quasilinear Equations. Vol. II. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  32. Shalimov, B. V.: 1972, Filtration of a three-phase liquid (Buckley–Leverett model) (in Russian). Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekhan. Zhidk. i. Gaza 7(1), 39–44. English translation in Fluid Dyn., 7: 36–40, 1972.Google Scholar
  33. Shearer, M. and Trangenstein, J. A.: 1989, Loss of real characteristics for models of three-phase flow in a porous medium, Transp. Porous Media 4, 499–525.Google Scholar
  34. Stklyanin, Y. I.: 1960, The motion of a mixture of three liquids in a porous medium (in Russian), Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekh. Nauk, Mekhanika i Mashinostroenie 2(5).Google Scholar
  35. Stone, H. L.: 1970, Probability model for estimating three-phase relative permeability, J. Pet. Technol. 23(2), 214–218. Petrol. Trans. AIME, 249.Google Scholar
  36. Stone, H. L.: 1973, Estimation of three-phase relative permeability and residual oil data, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 12(4), 53–61.Google Scholar
  37. Trangenstein, J. A.: 1989, Three-phase flow with gravity, in:W. B. Lindquist (ed.), Current Progress in Hyperbolic Systems: Riemann Problems and Computations, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 147–159.Google Scholar
  38. Zauderer, E.: 1983, Partial Differential Equations of Applied Mathematics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruben Juanes
    • 1
  • Tadeusz W. Patzek
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Petroleum EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordU.S.A
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyU.S.A
  3. 3.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryEarth Sciences DivisionBerkeleyU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations