Skip to main content
Log in

Speaking Together, Thinking Together? Exploring Metaphor and Cognition in a Shipyard Union Dispute

  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Social scientists recognize that discourses are structured by historical and social processes, but only rarely make the case that discourses have internal coherence due to processes of individual and social cognition. Where social scientists have argued for internal structuring, however, they have disagreed over how language and cognition interact for (1) individuals, (2) dyads, and (3) social groups. Using semantic sequence and metaphor analysis, I analyze transcripts of a series of meetings of Scottish shipyard workers in order to investigate cognitive schemas structuring the workers' discourse. Results show how individuals' schemas shaped their participation in their group's discourse. Possible future uses of the analytic method developed in this paper are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alexander, Jeffrey 1988 “Culture and political crisis: ‘Water-gate’ and Durkheimian sociology.” In Jeffrey Alexander (ed.), Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies: 187–225. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey, and Philip Smith 1993 “The discourse of American civil society: A new proposal for cultural studies.” Theory and Society 22:151–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC 1972 “‘It's your line,’ with Jimmy Reid and Robin Day.” December 3.

  • Bosman, Jan 1987 “Persuasive effects of political metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2:97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, Karen (ed.) 1989 “Sociopolitical control and the structure of national symbols: An empirical analysis of national anthems.” Social Forces 68(1):76–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, Karen 1995 “Designs on the White House: Television ads, message structure, and election outcome.” Research in Political Sociology 7:63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, Karen 1998 Deciphering Violence: The Cognitive Structure of Right and Wrong. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerulo, Karen 2002 Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, Dan, John Kennedy, and Penny Chiappe 2003 “Aptness is more important than comprehensibility in preference for metaphors and similes.” Poetics 31(1):51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul 2000 “To transform the phenomena: Feyerabend, proliferation, and recurrent neural networks.” In John Preston, Gonzalo Munévar, and David Lamb (eds.), The Worst Enemy of Science? Essays in Honor of Paul Feyerabend. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Chik 1996 “To concede or to contest? Language and class struggle.” In Colin Barker and Paul Kennedy (eds.), To Make Another World: Studies in Protest and Collective Action. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1 1999 Language, Ideology, and Social Consciousness: Developing a Sociohistorical Approach. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

  • Collins, Randall 1989 “On the microfoundations of macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology 86(5):984–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craib, Ian 1997 Classical Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Andrade, Roy 1987 “A folk model of the mind.” In D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought: 112–148. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul 1997 “Culture and cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 23:263–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul 2002 “Why cognitive sociology needs cognitive psychology.” In K. Cerulo (ed.), Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognitition: 274–282. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul, John Evans, and Bethany Bryson 1996 “Have Americans' social attitudes become more polarized?” American Journal of Sociology 102:690–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary 1970 Natural Symbols. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Derek, and Jonathan Potter 1992 Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, Nina, and Paul Lichterman 2003 “Culture in interaction.” American Journal of Sociology 108(4):735–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, Norman 1985 “Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 9(6):739–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier, Gilles, and Eve Sweetser 1996 Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, James (ed.) 1991 Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Tropes in Anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Gary 1979 “Small groups and culture creation: The idioculture of little league baseball teams.” American Sociological Review 44:733–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Gary 1995 “Public narration and group culture: Discerning discourse in social movements.” In Hank Johnston and Bert Klandermans (eds.), Social Movements and Culture: 127–143. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, Ludwik 1935 The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Reprint, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, John, and Charles Woolfson 1986 The Politics of the UCS Work-in. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, Roberto 1989 “From words to numbers: A generalized and linguistics-based coding procedure for collecting event-data from newspapers.” In C. Clogg (ed.), Sociological Methodology, Vol. 19. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, Roberto 1990a “Strategies for the prevention, detection, and correction of measurement error in data collected from textual sources.” Sociological Methods and Research 18(4):442–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, Roberto 1990b “Computer-assisted coding of textual data using semantic text grammars.” Sociological Methods and Research 19(2):225–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi, Roberto 1994 “From words to numbers: A set theory framework for the collection, organization, and analysis of narrative data.” In Peter Marsden (ed.), Sociological Methodology, Vol. 24. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, Dedre, and Donald Gentner 1983 “Flowing waters or teaming crowds: Schemas of electricity.” In Dedre Gentner and Albert L. Stevens (eds.), Schemas: 99–129. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatow Gibbs, Raymond 1994 The Poetics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodnow, Jacqueline 1990 “The socialization of cognition: What's involved?” In Stigler R. Shweder and G. Herdt (eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development: 259–286. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress 1988 Social Semiotics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Dorothy, and Naomi Quinn 1987 Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatow, Gabriel 2003 “‘Idea hamsters’ on the ‘bleeding edge’: Profane metaphors in high technology jargon” Poetics 31(1):1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jog, Mandar S., Yasuo Kubota, Christopher Connolly, Viveka Hillegaart, and Ann Graybiel 1999 “Building neural representations of habits.” Science 26:1745–1749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Joel, and Shelley Taylor 1981 “The effect of metaphor on political attitudes.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 24:305–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1981 “The form and function of schemas.” In Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Anne 1997 “Theorizing meaning construction in social movements: Symbolic structures and interpretation in the Irish land war, 1879–1882.” Sociological Theory 15:249–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett 1987 “Two theories of home heat control.” In D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought: 222–242. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett, James Boster, and Jennifer Hartley 1995 Environmental Values in American Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett, and J. Lave 1983 “Review of schemas.” American Anthropologist 85(4):1002–1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George 1987 “Image metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2(3):219–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson 1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1 1999 Philosophy in the Flesh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lakoff, George, and Zoltán Kövecses 1987 “The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English.” In D. Holland and N. Quinn (eds.), Cultural Models in Language and Thought: 195–221. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, Karl 1936 Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, John Levi 2002 “Power, authority, and the constraint of belief systems.” American Journal of Sociology 107:861–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1 2003 “What is field theory?” American Journal of Sociology 109:1–49.

  • Mohr, John, and Vincent Duquenne 1997 “The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York city, 1888–1917.” Theory and Society 26:305–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, Andrew 2000 “CodeRead: A multiplatform coding engine for text-based data.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

  • Polletta, Francesca 1997 “Culture and its discontents: Recent theorizing on the cultural dimensions of protest.” Sociological Quarterly 67(4):431–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Stephen, Ian Cesa, David Jones, and Nancy Collins 1990 “When is the federal budget like a baby? Metaphor in political rhetoric.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 53:125–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, Peter 1985 “Varieties of normative consensus.” American Sociological Review 50(3):333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, David 1980 Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading and Comprehension. Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, Donald 1979 “Generative metaphor and social policy: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy.” In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, William, Jr. 1999 “The concept(s) of culture.” In Victoria E. Bonnell and Lynn Hunt (eds.), Beyond the Cultural Turn. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, Neil 1992 “Culture: Coherent or incoherent.” In Richard Munch and Neil J. Smelser (eds.), Theory of Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Marc 1999 Fighting Words: Working-Class Formation, Collective Action, and Discourse in Early Nineteenth-Century England. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1 2000 “The talk and back talk of collective action: A dialogic analysis of repertoires of discourse among nineteenth-century English cotton spinners.” American Journal of Sociology 105(3):736–780.

  • Swidler, Ann 1986 “Culture in action: Symbols and strategies.” American Sociological Review 51:273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Mark 2001 Cognitive Dimensions of Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Stephen 2002 Brains/Practices/Relativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, Teun 1993 “Principles of critical discourse analysis.” Discourse and Society 4(2):249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, James 1998 Mind as Action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolfson, Charles 1976 “The semiotics of working class speech.” Working Papers in Cultural Studies 9:163–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, Eviatar 1993 The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1 1997 Social Mindscapes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ignatow, G. Speaking Together, Thinking Together? Exploring Metaphor and Cognition in a Shipyard Union Dispute. Sociological Forum 19, 405–433 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOFO.0000042555.15713.4d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOFO.0000042555.15713.4d

Navigation