Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 11–12, pp 835–850 | Cite as

The Costs of Accepting Gender Differences: The Role of Stereotype Endorsement in Women's Experience in the Math Domain

  • Toni Schmader
  • Michael Johns
  • Marchelle Barquissau
Article

Abstract

Two studies were designed to examine the costs of stereotype endorsement for women's self-perceptions, career intentions, and susceptibility to stereotype threat in the math domain. Study 1, a survey of women majoring in math-related fields, revealed that women who believe that status differences between the sexes are legitimate were more likely to endorse gender stereotypes about women's math abilities, which in turn predicted more negative self-perceptions of math competence and less interest in continuing study in one's field. In Study 2, women who tended to endorse gender stereotypes were found to be more susceptible to the negative effects of stereotype threat on their math test performance. The implications of these results for research on stereotype endorsement and women's math achievement are discussed.

gender stereotypes stereotype threat legitimizing ideologies career choice math performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Beyer, S. (1998). Gender differences in self-perception and negative recall biases. Sex Roles, 38, 103-133.Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, S. (1999). Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectations and evaluations. Sex Roles, 41, 279-296.Google Scholar
  4. Beyer, S., Rynes, K., Perrault, J., Hay, K., & Haller, S. (2003, February). Gender differences in computer science students. Paper presented at the 34th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Reno, NV.Google Scholar
  5. Bielinski, J., & Davison, M. L. (1998). Gender differences by item difficulty interactions in multiple-choice mathematics items. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 455-476.Google Scholar
  6. Blanton, H., Christie, C., & Dye, M. (2002). Social identity versus reference frame comparisons: The moderating role of stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 253-267.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, G. L., Steele, C. M., & Ross, L. D. (1999). The mentor's dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302-1318.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615-1628.Google Scholar
  9. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183-201.Google Scholar
  10. Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective status-enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 766-778.Google Scholar
  11. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.Google Scholar
  12. Hong, Y., Chui, C., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 588-599.Google Scholar
  13. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Ryan, M. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299-324.Google Scholar
  14. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11, 365-371.Google Scholar
  15. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2003). Do high-achieving female students underperform in private? The implications of threatening environments on intellectual processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 796-805.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobs, J. E., & Weisz, V. (1994). Gender stereotypes: Implications for gifted education. Roeper Review, 16, 152-155.Google Scholar
  17. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.Google Scholar
  18. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., & Sheldon, O. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.Google Scholar
  19. Keller, J. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 193-198.Google Scholar
  20. Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans' views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  21. Landau, M. J., Johns, M., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Martens, A., Goldenberg, J., et al. (in press). A Function of Form: Effects of mortality salience on structuring the social world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  22. Lerner, M. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Robinowitz, J., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.Google Scholar
  24. Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302-318.Google Scholar
  25. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Major, B., Gramzow, R. H., McCoy, S., Levin, S., Schmader, T., Sidanius, J., et al. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.Google Scholar
  27. Major, B., & Schmader, T. (1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In J. Swim & C. Stangor (Eds.), Prejudice: The target's perspective (pp. 93-111). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Major, B., & Schmader, T. (2001). Legitimacy and construal of social disadvantage. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), Psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 176-204). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Findings from the condition of education 1997: Women in mathematics and science (NCES Publication No. 97-982). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Postsecondary Institutions in the United States. Fall 2002 and Degrees and Other Awards Conferred: 2001–02 (NCES Publication No. 2004154). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  31. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.Google Scholar
  32. Oswald, D. L., & Harvey, R. D. (2003). A Q-methodological study of women's subjective perspectives on mathematics. Sex Roles, 49, 133-142.Google Scholar
  33. Quinn, D. M., & Crocker, J. (1999). When ideology hurts: Effects of belief in the Protestant ethic and feeling overweight on the psychological well-being of women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 402-414.Google Scholar
  34. Quinn, D. M., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematical problem solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 55-71.Google Scholar
  35. Sachdev, I., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1-24.Google Scholar
  36. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201.Google Scholar
  37. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.Google Scholar
  38. Schmader, T., Major, B., Eccleston, C. P., & McCoy, S. K. (2001). Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: Perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 782-796.Google Scholar
  39. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83.Google Scholar
  40. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 173-211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, J. L., & White, P.H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It's not just a woman's issue. Sex Roles, 47, 179-191.Google Scholar
  43. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28.Google Scholar
  44. Steele, C.M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape the intellectual identities and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629.Google Scholar
  45. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811.Google Scholar
  46. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379-440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Steele, J., James, J., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a man's world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46-50.Google Scholar
  48. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). Social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  49. Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents' gender stereotypes and teachers' beliefs as predictors of children's concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 144-151.Google Scholar
  50. Turner, J., & Brown, R. (1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives, and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201-234). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  51. Walsh, M., Hickey, C., & Duffy, J. (1999). Influence of item content and stereotype situation on gender differences in mathematical problem solving. Sex Roles, 41, 219-240.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toni Schmader
    • 1
  • Michael Johns
    • 1
  • Marchelle Barquissau
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of ArizonaTucson

Personalised recommendations