Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 7–8, pp 547–563 | Cite as

American and Chinese College Students' Predictions of People's Occupations, Housework Responsibilities, and Hobbies as a Function of Cultural and Gender Influences

  • Ling-Yi ZhouEmail author
  • Michelle L. Dawson
  • Candace L. Herr
  • Sarah K. Stukas
Article

Abstract

Predictions of people's occupations, housework responsibilities, and hobbies by American and Chinese college students reflected their sensitivity to the sex and gender information embedded in metaphors. Specific gender information, even when implicit, weighed more than general sex information, even when explicit, in the formation of social predictions. The gender-stereotyped prediction patterns were similar in the 2 countries, although the American students made more gender-typed predictions than did their Chinese counterparts, whereas the latter produced more gender-neutral predictions than did the former. The Chinese students' data were somewhat paradoxical, which might suggest the influence of mixed gender messages in their daily life. These cultural differences were true of all 3 domains of occupation, housework, and leisure activities. The evolutionary perspective and the sociocultural perspective were applied to explain the prediction patterns.

social prediction sex and gender culture metapor explicit and implicit information 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. All-China Women's Federation (2003). Facts and data. Retrieved July 21, 2003, from http://www.women.org.cn/womenorg/English/english/fact/mulu.htmGoogle Scholar
  2. Basow, S. A. (1984). Cultural variations in sex-typing. Sex Roles, 10, 577-585.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, J. (1997). Gender equality and participation in housework: A cross-national perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 28, 220-247.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, M., Sani, F., Hopkins, N., Agostini, L., & Malucchi, L. (2000). Children's gender categorization: An investigation of automatic processing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 97-102.Google Scholar
  5. Best, D. L. (2001). Gender concepts: Convergence in cross-cultural research and methodologies. Cross-Cultural Research, 35, 23-43.Google Scholar
  6. Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blair, S. L., & Lichter, D. T. (1991). Measuring the division of household labor: Gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 91-113.Google Scholar
  8. Bose, C. E. (1985). Jobs and gender: A study of occupational prestige. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  10. Cano, L., Solomon, S., & Holmes, D. S. (1984). Fear of success: The influence of sex, sex-role identity, and components of masculinity. Sex Roles, 10, 341-346.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, C. H. K. (1996). Toward a culturally relevant model of self-concept for the Hong Kong Chinese. In J. Pandey & D. Sinha (Eds.), Asian contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 235-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Coltrane, S. (1997). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coverman, S., & Sheley, J. F. (1986). Change in men's housework and child-care time, 1965–1975. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 413-422.Google Scholar
  14. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.Google Scholar
  15. Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991-1004.Google Scholar
  16. Dempsey, K. (2002). Who gets the best deal from marriage: Women or men? Journal of Sociology, 38, 91-110.Google Scholar
  17. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408-423.Google Scholar
  18. Fagot, B. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902-907.Google Scholar
  19. Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.Google Scholar
  20. Fong, V. L. (2002). China's one-child policy and the empowerment of urban daughters. American Anthropologist, 104, 1098-1109.Google Scholar
  21. Gager, C. T., Cooney, T. M., & Call, K. T. (1999). The effects of family characteristics and time use on teenagers' household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 982-994.Google Scholar
  22. Geary, D. C. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  23. Gerstel, N., & McGonagle, K. (1999). Job leaves and the limits of the family and medical leave act. Occupation and Work, 26, 510-534.Google Scholar
  24. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 401-424). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 50-67.Google Scholar
  27. Gu, X. (2001). Chinese women achieve progress. Retrieved July 21, 2003, from http://www.womenofchina.com.cn/magazines/other/apec/16chinese.htmGoogle Scholar
  28. Gustafson, M. (1997). Partisan women in the progressive era: The struggle for inclusion in American political parties. Journal of Women's History, 9, 8-30.Google Scholar
  29. Hallmark, J. R., & Armstrong, N. (1999). Gender equity in televised sports: A comparative analysis of men's and women's NCAA Division I basketball championship broadcasts, 1991–1995. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 43, 222-235.Google Scholar
  30. Hausman, C. R. (1984). A discourse on novelty and creation. Albany: State of University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hilgenkamp, K. D., & Livingston, M. M. (2002). Tomboys, masculine characteristics, and self-ratings of confidence in career success. Psychological Reports, 90, 743-749.Google Scholar
  32. Hong, L. K. (1987). Potential effects of the one-child policy on gender equality in the People's Republic of China. Gender and Society, 1, 317-326.Google Scholar
  33. Immigration and Naturalization Services. (1995, March). Profile series China: Family planning policy and practice in the People's Republic of China [PR/CHN/95.001a]. Retrieved July 24, 2003, from http://www.immigration.gov/graphics/services/asylum/ric/documentation/prchn95-001.pdfGoogle Scholar
  34. Information Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China. (1994, June). The situation of Chinese women. Retrieved July 24, 2003, from http://www.china.org.cn/e-white/chinesewoman/Google Scholar
  35. Judd, E. R. (2002). The Chinese women's movement between state and market. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Judd, P. C., & Oswald, P. A. (1997). Employment desirability: The interactive effects of gender-typed profile, stimulus sex, and gender-typed occupation. Sex Roles, 37, 467-466.Google Scholar
  37. Katz, A. N. (1989). On choosing the vehicles of metaphors: Referential concreteness, semantic distances, and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 486-499.Google Scholar
  38. Katz, P. A., & Boswell, S. (1986). Flexibility and traditionality in children's gender roles. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 112, 103-147.Google Scholar
  39. Kawakami, C., White, J. B., & Langer, E. (2000). Mindful and masculine: Freeing women leaders from the constraints of gender roles. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 49-63.Google Scholar
  40. Kenrick, D. T. (1987). Gender, genes, and the social environment: A biosocial interactionist perspective. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Sex and gender (pp. 14-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Kirchmeyer, C., & Bullin, C. (1997). Gender roles in a traditionally female occupation: A study of emergency, operating, intensive care, and psychiatric nurses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50, 78-95.Google Scholar
  42. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Liu, S. S., Comer, L. B., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2001). Gender differences in attitudes toward women as sales managers in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 21, 303-311.Google Scholar
  44. Lobel, T. E., Gewirtz, J., Pras, R., Shoeshine-Rokach, M., & Ginton, R. (1999). Preadolescents' social judgments: The relationship between self-endorsement of traits and gender-related judgments of female peers. Sex Role, 40, 483-498.Google Scholar
  45. Locksley, A., Borgida, E., & Brekke, N. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.Google Scholar
  46. Lueptow, L. B., Garovich-Szabo, L., & Lueptow, M. B. (2001). Social change and the persistence of sex typing: 1974–1997. Social Forces, 80, 1-36.Google Scholar
  47. Nilsen, A. P. (2000). Gender benders: Men and women navigating the freeway to equity. English Journal, 89, 40-44.Google Scholar
  48. Ortony, A. (1986). Some problems for models of metaphor comprehension and their developmental implications. Communication and Cognition, 19, 347-366.Google Scholar
  49. Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1971). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  51. Panayotova, E., & Brayfield, A. (1997). National context and gender ideology: Attitudes toward women's employment in Hungary and the United States. Gender and Society, 11, 627-655.Google Scholar
  52. People's Daily. (2002, March 6). Program for the development of Chinese women. Retrieved July 21, 2003, from http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200203/06/eng20020306 91486. shtmlGoogle Scholar
  53. Perry, S. (1998). Holding up half the sky: Women in China. Current History, 97, 279-284.Google Scholar
  54. Pleck, J. (1985). Working wives, working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Press, J. E., & Townsley, E. (1998). Wives' and husbands' housework reporting: Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender and Society, 12, 188-218.Google Scholar
  56. Record, J. C., & Record, W. (1976). Totalist and pluralist views of women's liberation: Some reflections on the Chinese and American settings. Social Problems, 23, 402-414.Google Scholar
  57. Richards, I. (1965). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rosen, S. (1995). Women and political participation in China. Pacific Affairs, 68, 315-341.Google Scholar
  59. Scanzoni, J., & Fox, G. L. (1980). Sex roles, family and society: The seventies and beyond. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 743-756.Google Scholar
  60. Shelton, B. A. (1992). Women, men and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework and leisure. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, H. L., Gager, C. T., & Morgan, S. P. (1998). Identifying underlying dimensions in spouses' evaluations of fairness in the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 27, 305-327.Google Scholar
  62. Spence, J. T. (1991). Do the BSRI and PAQ measure the same or different concepts? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 141-165.Google Scholar
  63. St. Pierre, R., Herendeen, N. M., Moore, D. S., & Nagle, A. M. (1994). Does occupational stereotyping still exist? Journal of Psychology, 128, 589-598.Google Scholar
  64. Stockman, M. (1994). Gender inequality and social structure in urban China. Sociology, 28, 759-777.Google Scholar
  65. Stohs, J. H. (1995). Predictors of conflict over the household division of labor among women employed full-time. Sex Roles, 33, 257-275.Google Scholar
  66. Stohs, J. H. (2000). Multicultural women's experience of household labor, conflicts, and equity. Sex Roles, 42, 339-361.Google Scholar
  67. Tsui, M., & Rich, L. (2002). The only child and educational opportunity for girls in urban China. Gender and Society, 16, 74-92.Google Scholar
  68. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.Google Scholar
  69. Udry, J. R. (2000). Biological limits of gender construction. American Sociological Review, 65, 443-457.Google Scholar
  70. Walker, K., & Woods, M. (1976). Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services. Washington, DC: American Home Economics Association.Google Scholar
  71. Wen, P. Z., & Cai, H. (1994). Women students in higher education in China: A personal insight. Women's Studies International Forum, 7, 533-536.Google Scholar
  72. Wood, E., Desmarais, S., & Gugula, S. (2002). The impact of parenting experience on gender stereotyped toy play of children. Sex Roles, 47, 39-49.Google Scholar
  73. Yi, C.-C., & Chien, W.-Y. (2002). The linkage between work and family: Females' employment patterns in three Chinese societies. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 33, 451-474.Google Scholar
  74. Zhou, L.-Y. (1995). Changes in the affective meaning of topic and vehicle terms after metaphor comprehension. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Miami University, Oxford, OH.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ling-Yi Zhou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michelle L. Dawson
    • 1
  • Candace L. Herr
    • 1
  • Sarah K. Stukas
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Work and Psychology DepartmentUniversity of St. FrancisJoliet

Personalised recommendations