Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 50, Issue 7–8, pp 539–546 | Cite as

Gender Type and Comfort with Cross-Dressers

  • Cindi M. Penor CeglianEmail author
  • Nancy N. Lyons
Article

Abstract

The Bem Sex Role Inventory was used to classify university participants into the gender types: masculine, feminine, and androgynous. Two men who cross-dress were invited to attend and interact with the participants during regular classroom periods. Pre- and posttests were administered to measure the participants' comfort level with the phenomenon of cross-dressing. Feminine-gender-typed participants were initially the most comfortable with the concept of cross-dressing and experienced the least pre- and posttest mean change following the interaction. The masculine-gender-typed participants were the least comfortable, but experienced the greatest pre- and posttest mean change. Androgynous participants' differences for pre- and posttest scores were greater than the feminine-gender-typed participants' differences, but less than those of the masculine-gender-typed participants.

cross-dresser androgynous gender type 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

references

  1. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 151-116.Google Scholar
  2. Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634-643.Google Scholar
  3. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.Google Scholar
  4. Bem, S. L. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 32. Psychology and gender (pp. 179-226). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016-1023.Google Scholar
  7. Bullough, V. L., & Bullough, B. (1997). Are transvestites necessarily heterosexual? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 1-12.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (1985). Love and sex role stereotypes: Do macho men and feminine women make better lovers? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 170-176.Google Scholar
  9. D'Augelli, A. R., & Rose, M. (1990). Homophobia in a university community: Attitudes and experience of White heterosexual freshmen. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 484-491.Google Scholar
  10. Eicher, J. B., & Roach-Higgins, M. E. (1992). Dress and identity. In J. B. Eicher, K. K. P. Johnson, & ME Roach-Higgins (Eds.), Dress and identity (pp. 7-18). New York: Fairchild.Google Scholar
  11. Eliason, M. J. (1997). The prevalence and nature of biphobia in heterosexual undergraduate students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 317-326.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. (1966). The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis (J. Strachey, Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1933)Google Scholar
  13. Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (1987). Sex, sex roles, and family love. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 148, 45-52.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia, L. (1982). Sex role orientation and stereotypes about male–female sexuality. Sex Roles, 8, 863-876.Google Scholar
  15. Green, S., Dixon, P., & Gold-Neil, D. (1993). The effects of a gay/lesbian panel discussion on college student attitudes toward gay men, lesbians, and persons with AIDS (PWAs). Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 19, 47-63.Google Scholar
  16. Halloran, J. D. (1967). Attitude formation and change. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hegland, J. (1999). Drag queens, transvestites, transsexuals: Stepping across the accepted boundaries of gender. In M. L. Damhorst, K. A. Miller, & S. O. Michelman (Eds.), The meanings of dress (pp. 193-205). New York: Fairchild.Google Scholar
  18. Herek, G. M. (2000a). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19-22.Google Scholar
  19. Herek, G. M. (2000b). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251-266.Google Scholar
  20. Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals' attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264-275.Google Scholar
  21. Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412-424.Google Scholar
  22. Herek, G., & Glunt, E. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239-244.Google Scholar
  23. Hudson, W., & Ricketts, W. (1980). A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 5, 357-372.Google Scholar
  24. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behavior, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336-353.Google Scholar
  25. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E., Jr. (1998). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39-61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Lance, L. M. (1987). The effects of interaction with gay persons on attitudes toward homosexuality. Human Relations, 40, 329-335.Google Scholar
  27. Lobel, T. E. (1994). Sex typing and the social perception of gender stereotypic and non stereotypic behavior: The uniqueness of feminine males. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 379-385.Google Scholar
  28. Lottes, I. L., & Kuriloff, P. J. (1994). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27, 675-688.Google Scholar
  29. Marsiglio, W. (1993). Attitudes toward homosexual activity and gays as friends: A national survey of heterosexual 15–19 year old males. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 12-17.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F., Jr. (1981). A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. Child Development, 54, 1119-1134.Google Scholar
  31. Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353-369.Google Scholar
  32. Moulton, J., & Adams-Price, C. (1997). Homosexuality, heterosexuality, and cross-dressing: Perceptions of gender discordant behavior. Sex Roles, 37, 441-450.Google Scholar
  33. Patton, W., & Morrison, M. (1993). Effects of a university subject on attitudes toward human sexuality. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 19, 93-107.Google Scholar
  34. Patton, W., & Morrison, M. (1994). Investigating attitudes toward sexuality: Two methodologies. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 2, 185-197.Google Scholar
  35. Ray, A., & Gold, S. (1996). Gender roles, aggression, and alcohol use in dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 47-55.Google Scholar
  36. Rubinstein, R. (1995). Dress codes. Boulder, CO: West View Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). Attitudes toward homosexuals among students at a Canadian University. Sex Roles, 40, 139-149.Google Scholar
  38. Schiffman, L., & Kanuk, L. (2004). Consumer behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  39. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social-psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.Google Scholar
  40. Sears, J. T., & Williams, W. L. (Eds.) (1997). Overcoming heterosexism and homophobia: Strategies that work. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Stone, G. P. (1965). Appearance and the self. In J. B. Eicher & ME Roach-Higgins (Eds.), Dress, adornment, and the social order (pp. 216-246). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  42. Triandis, H. C. (1971). Attitude and attitude change. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Waldo, C., & Kemp, J. (1997). Should I come out to my students? An empirical investigation. Journal of Homosexuality, 34, 79-94.Google Scholar
  44. Wong, F. Y., McCreary, D. R., Carpenter, K. M., Engle, A., & Korchynsky, R. (1999). Gender-related factors influencing perceptions of homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 37, 19-31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human Development, Consumer and Family SciencesSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookings
  2. 2.Department of Apparel Merchandising and Interior DesignSouth Dakota State UniversityBrookings

Personalised recommendations