Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions of maize and Italian ryegrass in a living mulch system: (1) Shoot growth and rooting patterns

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been demonstrated that the use of living mulches solves some of the environmental problems associated with the conventional cropping of maize (Zea mays L.). However, plant growth and yield are often reduced in such a cropping system. Since shoot competition between the main crop and the cover crop can be avoided by regular cutting of the cover crop, it was hypothesized that decreases in maize growth and yield in a living Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) mulch must be related to below ground interactions between the two species and that these may be traced back to the characteristics of their root systems. Two cropping systems, maize grown alone in bare soil (conventional cropping, BS) or together with a living Italian ryegrass mulch (LM), were studied in lysimeters (1.0 m2 surface area and 1.1 m depth) placed outdoors, near Zurich Switzerland, for a duration of three years. In the LM treatment a strip, 0.3 m wide, in the center of the plot around the maize row was free of grass. For comparison, an Italian ryegrass (RG) treatment, managed as the LM treatment but without maize plants, was also included in the study. Minirhizotrons (54 mm inner diameter) were horizontally installed at ten soil depths between 0.0 and 1.0 m, perpendicular to the orientation of the maize rows. The development of the maize shoot and the rooting patterns were observed non-destructively. LM strongly modified the maize crop by decreasing growth and duration of the leaf area, and thus biomass and grain yield at harvest by as much as 78 and 72%, respectively. Maximum root densities in the three treatments were observed around the time of maize anthesis. However, BS maize was unable to build up root densities similar to those observed in Italian ryegrass plots at the time of maize sowing. The root densities of the LM and the RG treatments were usually similar. The inability of the maize plants to establish a competitive root system in the LM limits the supply of nutrients and water and therefore reduces growth and yield. Improving the productivity of maize in living mulches will depend on the ability to achieve a better separation of the rooting volumes of the two species, so that specific steps to facilitate the main crop and control the living mulch can be taken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams W E, Pallas Jr J E and Dawson R N 1970 Tillage methods for corn-sod systems in the Southern Piedmont. Agron. J. 62, 646–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow P W, Parker J S, Butler R and Brain P 1993 Gravitropism of primary roots of Zea maysL. at different displacement angles. Ann. Bot. 71, 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett K H 1990 No-tillage corn production in an alfalfa-grass sod. J. Prod. Agric. 3, 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigler F, Ammon H U, Högger C, Jäggi W, Schubiger F X, Waldburger M, Walther U, Weisskopf P and Fried P M 1995 Vier Maisanbauverfahren 1990 bis 1993. Ökologie und Ökonomie in den Verfahren-eine Bilanz. Agrarforsch. 2, 389–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottenberg H, Masiunas J, Eastman V and Eastburn D 1997 Yield and quality constraints of cabbage planted in rye mulch. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 14, 323–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box Jr J E, Wilkinson S R, Dawson R N and Kozachyn J 1980 Soil water effects on no-till corn production in strip and completely killed mulches. Agron. J. 72, 797–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson L A, Duff E I, Campbell C D and Hirst D J 2001 Depth distribution of cherry (Prunus aviumL.) tree roots as influenced by grass root competition. Plant Soil 231, 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHaan R L, Wyse D L, Ehlke N J, Maxwell B D and Putnam D H 1994 Simulation of spring-seeded smoother plants for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derieux M and Bonhomme R 1990 Heat units requirements of maize inbred lines for pollen shedding and silking: results of the European FAO network. Maydica 35, 41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein C V, Sheaffer C C and Oliveira V F 1992 Corn growth and yield in an alfalfa living mulch system. J. Prod. Agric. 5, 332–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echtenkamp G W and Moomaw R S 1989 No-till corn production in a living mulch system. Weed Technol. 3, 261–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enache A J and Ilnicki R D 1990 Weed control by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) used as a living mulch. Weed Technol. 4, 534–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAL/RAC. 2001. Guidelines for fertilizer use in field and fodder crops 2001. Agrarforsch. 8, 3–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar J F and Jones D L 2000 The control of carbon acquisition by roots. New Phytol. 147, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feil B, Garibay S V, Ammon H U and Stamp P 1997 Maize production in a grass mulch system-seasonal patterns of indicators of the nitrogen status of maize. Eur. J Agron. 7, 171–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feil B and Liedgens M 2001 Crop Production in Living Mulches-a Review. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften 5, 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibay S V, Stamp P, Ammon H U and Feil B 1997. Yield and quality components of silage maize in killed and live cover crops. Eur. J. Agron. 6, 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubinger V P and Minotti P L 1990 Managing white clover living mulch for sweet corn production with partial rototilling. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 5, 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyland K U and Werner A 1988 The formation of yield and the dynamics of system-conditions in mixed cultivations and their mathematical description with the example of populations consisting of maize and companion plants. Bodenkultur 39, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäggi W, Oberholzer H R and Waldburger M 1995. Vier Maisanbauverfahren 1990 bis 1993. Auswirkungen auf das Bodenleben. Agrarforsch. 2, 361–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klocke N L, Nichols J T, Grabouski P H and Todd R 1989 Intercropping corn in perennial cool-season grass on irrigated sandy soil. J. Prod. Agric. 2, 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumwenda J D T, Radcliffe D E, Hargrove W L and Bridges D C 1993 Reseeding of crimson clover and corn grain yield in a living mulch system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 517–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz T, Appleman M D and Bray R H 1946 Preliminary trials with intercropping of corn and clover. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 11, 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leary J and DeFrank J 2000 Living mulches for organic farming systems. HortTechnology 10, 692–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledent J F, Henkart T and Jacobs B 1990 Phénologie du maïs, visualisation de la croissance et du développement. Rev. Agric. 43, 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedgens M, Frossard E, and Richner W2004 Interactions of maize and Italian ryegrass in a living mulch system: (2) Nitrogen and water dynamics. Plant Soil (in print).

  • Liedgens M and Richner W 2001a Minirhizotron observations of the spatial distribution of the maize root system. Agron. J. 93, 1097–1104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedgens M and Richner W 2001b Relation between maize (Zea maysL.) leaf area and root density observed with minirhizotrons. Eur. J. Agron. 15, 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedgens M, Richner W, Stamp P and Soldati A 2000a A rhizolysimeter facility for studying the dynamics of crop and soil processes: description and evaluation. Plant Soil 223, 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedgens M, Soldati A, Stamp P and Richner W 2000b Root development of maize (Zea maysL.) as observed with minirhizotrons in lysimeters. Crop Sci. 40, 1665–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell R C, Milliken G A, Stroup W W and Wolfinger R D 1996 SAS® system for mixed models. SAS Inst., Cary, USA, 633 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütke Entrup N and Zerhusen P 1992 Mais und Umwelt. Eine Studie über die Umweltverträglichkeit des Maisanbaus. Probleme und Lösungsansätze. Kovac, Hamburg. Germany. 269 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R C, Greyson P R and Gordon R 1999 Competition between corn and a living mulch. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masiunas J B 1998 Production of vegetables using cover crop and living mulches-a review. J. Veget. Crop Prod. 4, 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto T 1994 Plagiogravitropism of maize roots. Plant Soil 165, 327–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson A G and Wien H C 1983 Screening of turfgrasses and clovers for use as living mulches in sweet corn and cabbage. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108, 1071–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson W K, Lundy H W, Prine G M and Currey W L 1976 Planting corn in sod and small grain residues with minimum tillage. Agron. J. 68, 271–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F 1988 Analysis of the spatial variability of maize root density: I. Effect of wheel compaction on the spatial arrangement of roots. Plant Soil 107, 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J R 1996 Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9, 475–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles L J, William R D and Crabtree G D 1989 Analyzing competition between a living mulch and a vegetable crop in an interplanting system. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 114, 1029–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemenchik R A, Albrecht K A, Boerboom C M and Lauer J G 2000 Corn production with kura clover as a living mulch. Agron. J. 92, 698–705.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liedgens, M., Soldati, A. & Stamp, P. Interactions of maize and Italian ryegrass in a living mulch system: (1) Shoot growth and rooting patterns. Plant and Soil 262, 191–203 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037041.24789.67

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000037041.24789.67

Navigation