Advertisement

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 459–469 | Cite as

Disability or end-of-life? Competing narratives in bioethics

  • Joseph Kaufert
  • Thomas Koch
Article

Abstract

Bioethics, and indeed much ethicalwriting generally, makes its point throughnarratives. The religious parable no less thanthe medical teaching case uses a simple storyto describe appropriate action or theapplication of a critical principle. Whilepowerful, the telling story has limits. In thispaper the authors describe a simple teachingcase on ``end-of-life'' decision making that wasill received by its audience. The authors ill-receivedexample, involving the disconnection ofventilation in a patient with ALS (Lou Gherig'sDisease) was critiqued by audience members withlong-term experience as ventilation users. Inthis case, the supposedly simple narrative ofthe presenters conflicted with the lifehistories of the audience. The lessons of thisstory, and the conflict that resulted, speakcritically to the limits of simple teachingcases as well as the strengths of narrativeanalysis as a tool for the exploration ofbioethical case histories.

ALS bioethics disability ``end-of-life'' decision-making narrative narrative analysis Polio 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bindman, Stephen. “Judge Stays on Bench to Fight His Disease's ‘Death Sentence.'” Toronto Star (January 11, 1993): A1, A11.Google Scholar
  2. Chambers, Tod. “The Fiction of Bioethics: A Précis.” American Journal of Bioethics 1(1) (2001): 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers, Tod. “From the Ethicist's Point of View: The Literary Nature of Ethical Inquiry.” Hastings Center Report 26(1) (1996): 25–32.Google Scholar
  4. Duncan, Barbara and Diane Woods, eds. Ethical Issues in Disability and Rehabilitation. Edited by New York: World Institute on Disability, Rehabilitation International, World Rehabilitation Fund, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  5. Elliot, Carl. A Philosophical Disease: Bioethics, Culture, and Identity. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Ethical Issues in Disability and Rehabilitation. Annual Meeting of the Society for Disabilities, Pre-Conference Workshop. Denver, Colorado (May 9- 11, 1989).Google Scholar
  7. Frank, Arthur. “Social Bioethics and the Critique of Autonomy.” Health 4(3) (2000): 378–397.Google Scholar
  8. Frank, Arthur. “Rhetoric, Moral Relativism, and Power.” American Journal of Bioethics 1(1) (2000): 51–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geertz, Clifford. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  10. Hardwig, John. “What About Family?” Hastings Center Report 20(2) (1990): 5–10.Google Scholar
  11. Koch, Tom. Scarce Goods: Justice, Fairness, and Organ Transplantation.NewYorkand London: Praeger Books, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. Koch, Tom. “Disability and Difference: Balancing Social and Physical Constructions.” Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (2001): 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch, Tom. “End-of-Life Issues: A Disabilities Perspective.” In Cultural Issues in End of Life Decision Making. Edited by Kathryn Braun, James H. Pietsch, and P.L. Blanchette. pp. 285–301. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. Koch, Tom. “Stillborn Bioethics.” In Ethics, Law, and Aging Review, Vol. 6. Edited by Marshall Kapp. 223–238. New York: Springer Publishing, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. Koch, Tom. “Life Quality vs. the ‘Quality of Life’ Assumptions Underlying Prospective Quality of Life Instruments in Health Care Planning.” Social Science & Medicine 51 (2000): 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuczewski, G. Mark. “In Search of an Honest Case.” American Journal of Bioethics 1(1) (2001): 44–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuczewski, G. Mark. Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, L. Bruce. “Autonomy and the Refusal of Lifesaving Treatment.” Hastings Center Report 11(4) (1981): 22–28.Google Scholar
  19. Nelson, L. James. “Taking Families Seriously.” Hastings Center Report 22(4) (1992): 6–12.Google Scholar
  20. Rodriguez v. British Columbia. S. C. J. 94 (September 30, 1993).Google Scholar
  21. Singer, Peter. “Response to Mark Kuczewski.” American Journal of Bioethics 1(3) (2001): 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thomasma, D. “Commentary: Guidelines for Rationing Resemble Process of Family Decision Making.” British Medical Journal 312 (1996): 1531–1532.Google Scholar
  23. Wackers, Gerardus L. Constructivist Medicine. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Maastricht, NL, 1994.Google Scholar
  24. Young, M. Jenny, McNicoll, P.P. “Against All Odds: Positive Life Experiences of People with Advanced Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.” Health and Social Work 23(1) (1998): 253–260.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Kaufert
    • 1
  • Thomas Koch
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Aboriginal Health Research, Department of Community Health SciencesUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Department of Geography (Medical)University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations