Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical approach towards improved spatial estimates of soil moisture for vegetation analysis

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landscape-level spatial estimates of soil water content are critical to understanding ecological processes and predicting watershed response to environmental change. Because soil moisture influences are highly variable at the landscape scale, most meteorological datasets are not detailed enough to depict spatial trends in the water balance at these extents. We propose a tactical approach to gather high-resolution field data for use in soil moisture models. Using these data, we (1) describe general soil moisture trends for a 6400 ha watershed in the Oregon Western Cascades, USA (2) use this description to identify environmental variables to stratify across in collecting data for a statistical explanatory model of soil moisture spatial pattern at the onset of seasonal drought, and (3) examine the spatial scale of variability in soil moisture measurements compared to the scale of variability in potential explanatory factors. The results indicate that soil moisture dynamics and controls are different for different soil depths across this mountainous watershed. Soil moisture variability exhibits complex spatial patterns that can be partially estimated (up to 50 percent of the variation accounted) with easily measurable climatic and terrain variables. The analysis incorporates both macroscale (climate) and mesoscale (topographic drainage and radiation) influences on the water balance. Without additional data on the distribution of edaphic and biotic factors, we are not able to model the variability of soil moisture at the microscale. The regression approach can be used to extrapolate field measurements across similar topographic areas to examine spatial patterns in forest vegetation and moisture-controlled ecological processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Band L.E., Patterson P., Nemani R. and Running S.W. 1993. Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: incorporating hillslope hydrology. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 63: 93–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry R.G. 1992. Mountain Weather and Climate. Routledge, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beers T.W., Dress P.E. and Wensel L.C. 1966. Aspect transformation in site productivity research. Journal of Forestry 64: 691–692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven K. and Kirkby M.J. (eds), 1993. Channel Network Hydrology. Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven K.J. and Kirkby M.J. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrologic Science Bulletin 24: 43–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer D.G, Wright R.J., Winant W.M. and Perry H.D. 1990. Soil water relations on a hilltop cornfield in central Appalachia. Soil Science 149: 383–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady N.C. and Weil R.R. 1999. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen N.L., Bartuska A.M., Brown J.H., Carpenter S., D’Antonio C., Francis R., Franklin J.F., MacMahon J.A., Noss R.N., Parsons D.J., Peterson C.H., Turner M.G. and Woodmansee R.G. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6: 665–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark J.S. 1990. Landscape interactions among nitrogen mineralization, species composition, and long-term fire frequency. Biogeochemistry 11: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer W., Leemans R., Schulze E.D., Bondeau A. and S.R.J. 1999. Data needs and limitations for broad-scale ecosystem modelling. In: Walker B., Steffen W., Canadell J. and Ingram J. (eds), The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change: Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems. University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 88–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crave A. and Gascuel-Odoux C. 1997. The influence of topography on time and space distribution of soil surface water content. Hydrological Processes 11: 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly C., Neilson R.P. and Phillips D.L. 1994. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33: 140–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Odorico P., Ridolfi L., Porporato A. and Rodriguez-Iturbe I. 2000. Preferential states of seasonal soil moisture: The impact of climate flucuations. Water Resources Research 36: 2209–2219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubayah R.C. and Rich P.M. 1995. Topographic solar radiation models for GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 9: 405–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESRI. ARC/Info 7. 1994. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Redlands, California, USA.

  • Franklin J.F. and Dyrness C.T. 1988. Natural Vegetation of Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson R.B., Western A.W., Chiew F.H.S. and Bloschl G. 1997. Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns. Local and non-local controls. Water Resources Research 33: 2897–2908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier C.C. and Logan R.S. 1977. Old-growth Pseudotsuga menziesii communities of a western Oregon watershed: biomass distribution and production budgets. Ecological Monographs 47: 373–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helvey J.D., Hewlett J.D. and Douglass J.E. 1972. Predicting soil moisture in the southern Appalachians. Soil Science Society of America Proceeding 36: 954–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkelrath W.N., Hamburg S.P. and Murphy F. 1991. Automatic, real-time monitoring of soil moisture in a remote field area with time domain reflectometry. Water Resources Research 27: 857–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson L.R., Dale M.E., Scott C.T. and Prasad A., 1997. A GIS-derived integrated moisture index to predict forest composition and productivity of Ohio forests (U.S.A). Landscape Ecology 12: 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenny H. 1980. The Soil Resoure. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post D.A. and Jones J.A. 2001. Hydrologic regimes of forested, mountainous, headwater basins in New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, and Puerto Rico. Advances in Water Resources 24: 1195–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. and Fortin M.J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80: 107–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lookingbill T. and Urban D. 2003. Spatial estimation of air temperature differences for landscape-scale studies in montane environments. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 114: 141–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay D.S. and Band L.E. 1997. Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: dynamic coupling of distributed hydrology and canopy growth. Hydrological Processes 11: 1197–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee A. 1998. Focus on field stations: Andrews H.J. Experimental Forest. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 79: 241–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C. and Urban D.L. 1999. Forest pattern, fire, and climatic change in the Sierra Nevada. Ecosystems 2: 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore I.D., Burch G.J. and Mackenzie D.H. 1988. Topographic effects on the distribution of surface water and the location of ephemeral gullies. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineering 31: 1098–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore I.D., Grayson R.B. and Ladson A.R. 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological Processes 5: 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson R.P. 1991. Climatic constraints and issues of scale controlling regional biomes. In: Holland M.M., Risser P.G. and Naiman R.J. (eds), Ecotones: The Role of Landscape Boundaries in the Management and Restoration of Changing Environments. Chapman and Hall, New York, USA, pp. 31–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolov N.T. and Zeller K.F. 1992. A solar radiation algorithm for ecosystem dynamic models. Ecological Modelling 6: 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann J.L. and Spies T.A. 1998. Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecological Monographs 68: 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker A.J. 1982. The topographic relative moisture index: an approach to soil-moisture assessment in mountain terrain. Physical Geography 3: 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor J. and Post. W.M. 1988. Response of northern forests to CO2-induced chmate change. Nature 334: 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips D.L., Dolph J. and Marks D. 1992. A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation in mountainous terrain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 58: 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson C.W. 1981. Stochastic simulation of daily precipitation, temperature and solar radiation. Water Resources Research 17: 182–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Running S.W., Nemani R.R. and Hungerford R.D. 1987. Extrapolation of synoptic meteorological data in mountainous terrain and its use for simulating forest evapotranspiration and photosynthesis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 472–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. and Rohlf R.J. 1995. Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. 2002. Mapping the Thermal Climate of the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson N.L. 1990. Climatic controls on vegetation distribution: the role of the water balance. American Naturalist 135: 649–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson N.L. 1998. Actual evapotranspiration and deficit: biologically meaningful correlates of vegetation distribution across spatial scales. Journal of Biogeography 25: 855–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban D.L., Miller C., Halpin P.N. and Stephenson N.L. 2000. Forest gradient response in Sierran landscapes: the physical template. Landscape Ecology 15: 603–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertessy R.A., Hatton T.J., Benyon R.G. and Dawes W.R. 1996. Long-term growth and water balance predictions for a mountain ash (Eucalyptus regnans) forest catchment subject to clear-felling and regeneration. Tree Physiology 16: 221–232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Western A.W., G. Bloschl and Grayson R.B. 1998. How well do indicator variograms capture the spatial connectivity of soil moisture? Hydrological Processes 12: 1851–1868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeakley J.A., Swank W.T., Swift L.W., Hornberger G.W. and Shugart H.H. 1998. Soil moisture gradients and controls on a southern Appalachian hillslope from drought through recharge. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2: 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel D.B., McKee A., Hawk G.M. and Dyrness C.T. 1976. Relationships of environment to composition, structure, and diversity of forest communities of the central western Cascades of Oregon. Ecological Monographs 46: 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd Lookingbill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lookingbill, T., Urban, D. An empirical approach towards improved spatial estimates of soil moisture for vegetation analysis. Landscape Ecol 19, 417–433 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030451.29571.8b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAND.0000030451.29571.8b

Navigation