Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Firm Growth and FDI: Are Multinationals Stimulating Local Industrial Development?

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to improve our understanding of the empirical determinants of firm growth by extending the literature to include a new group of variables related to foreign direct investment (FDI), namely the degree of foreign ownership and technology spillovers. Based on recent developments in the field, our analysis also encompasses the role of sunk costs and financial constraints, while quantile regression techniques are adopted as more suitable to the data available (2,640 manufacturing firms operating in Greece in the 1992–1997 period). Our findings highlight the role of FDI in increasing firm growth with varying intensity depending on industry groups and regression quantiles, and vindicate the use of new variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitchison, J. and Brown, J.A.C., The Lognormal Distribution. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, B. and Harrison, A., “Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 89 no. 3, pp. 605–618, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almus, M. and Nerlinger, E.A., “Testing `Gibrat's', lawfor young firms-empirical evidence for West Germany,” Small Business Econ., vol. 15, pp. 1–12, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslanoglu, E., “Spillover effects of foreign direct investment on Turkish manufacturing industry,” J. Int. Devel., vol. 12, pp. 1111–1130, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., Santarelli, E., and Vivarelli, M., “Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing,” Int. J. Ind. Organ., vol. 17, pp. 965–983, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa, N. and Louri, H. “On the determinants of multinationals' ownership preferences: evidence from Greece and Portugal,” Int. J. Ind. Organ., vol. 20 no. 4, pp.493–515, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrell, R. and Pain, N., “Foreign direct investment, technological change, and economic growth within Europe,” Econ. J., vol. 107, pp. 1770–1786, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beccetti, L. and Trovato, G., “The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms. The role of the availability of external finance,” Small Business Econ., vol. 19, pp. 291–306, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellak, C., “Howdomestic and foreign firms differ and howdoes it matter?” J. Econ. Surveys, vol. 18 no. 4, pp. 483–514, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., and Persson, H., “Foreign investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped economy: evidence from the Mexican manufacturing industry,” World Devel., vol. 11, pp. 493–501, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M. and Kokko, A., “Multinational corporations and spillovers,” J. Econ. Surveys, vol. 12, pp. 247–277, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M. and Sjöholm, F., “Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local participation with multinationals matter?” Euro. Econ. Rev., vol. 43 no. 4–6, pp. 915–923, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., “Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of Mexico,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 35 no. 1, pp. 97–110, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomström, M., Kokko, A., and Globerman, S., “The determinants of host country spillovers from foreign direct investment: a reviewand synthesis of the literature?” in Inward investment, Technological Change and Growth, Pain, N. (ed.), Palgrave: New York, pp. 34–65, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blonigen, B.A. and Tomlin, K., “Size and growth of Japanese plants in the United States,” Int. J. Ind. Organ., vol. 19, pp. 931–952, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky, M., “Recent advances in quantile regression models,” Human Resour., vol. 33, pp. 88–126, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, L. and Mata, J., “On the evolution of the firm size distribution: facts and theory,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 93 no. 4, pp. 1075–1090, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, L., “Sunk costs, firm size and firm growth,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 43, pp. 161–172, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E., “Multinational firms, competition, and productivity in host-country markets,” Economica, vol. 41 no. 2, pp. 176–193, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E., “Industrial organization and newfindings on the turnover and mobility of firms,” J. Econ. Liter., vol. 36 no. 4, pp. 1947–1982, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesher, A., “Testing the lawof proportionate effect,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 27, pp. 403–411, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhibber, P. and Majumdar, S., “Foreign ownership and profitability: Property rights, control, and the performance of firms in Indian industry,” J. LawEcon., vol. 42 no. 1, pp. 209–238, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, T. and Quadrini, V., “Financial markets and firm dynamics,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 91 no. 5, pp. 1286–1310, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S., “Size, age and firm growth in an infant industry: The computer hardware industry in India,” Int. J. Ind. Organ., vol. 13, pp. 111–126, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimelis, S. and Louri, H., “Foreign ownership and production efficiency: A quantile regression analysis,” Oxford Econ. Papers, vol. 54, pp. 449–469, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S. and Hoekman, B., “Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises,” World Bank Econ. Rev., vol. 14, pp. 49–64, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, N., “The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the U.K.,” Manchester School, vol. 69, pp. 103–119, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, P. and Hughes A., “Age, size, growth and survival: U.K. companies in the 1980s,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 42, pp. 115–140, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., Roberts, M.J., and Samuelson, L., “The growth and failure of U.S. manufacturing plants,” Quart. J. Econ., vol. 104, pp. 671–698, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elston, J.-A., “An Examination of the relationship between firm size, growth and liquidity in the Neuer Market,” Economic Research Centre of the Deutsche Bundesbank, Discussion Paper 15/02, 2002.

  • Evans, D.S., “Tests of alternative theories of firm growth,” J. Political Econ., vol. 95, pp. 657–674, 1987a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D.S., “The relationship between firm growth size, and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 35, pp. 567–581, 1987b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farinas, J.C. and Moreno, L., “Firms' growth, size and age: A nonparametric approach,” Rev. Ind. Organ., vol. 17, pp. 249–265, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S.M, Hubbard, G.R., and Petersen, B.C., “Financing constraints and corporate investment,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1, pp. 141–195, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulos, G. and Louri, H., “Corporate growth and FDI: Are multinationals stimulating local industrial development?” CEPR London Discussion Paper No. 3128, 2002.

  • Gibrat, R., Les Inegalites Economiques, Sirey: Paris, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girma, S., “Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: a threshold regression analysis,” European Economy Group Working Paper No. 25, 2003.

  • Girma, S., Greenaway, D., and Wakelin, K., “Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the U.K.?” Scot. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 48 no. 2, pp. 119–133, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, S., “Foreign direct investment and `spillover' efficiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries,” Can. J. Econ., vol. 12, pp. 42–56, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görg, H. and Strobl, E., “Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis,” Econ. J., vol. 111, pp. 723–739, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, W., “Interquantile and simultaneous-quantile regression,” State Tech. Bull., vol. 38, pp. 14–22, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H., Econometric Analysis, Prentice-Hall: New Jersey, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R., Redding, S., and Simpson, H., “Productivity convergence and foreign ownership at the establishment level,” The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) Working Paper WP02/22, 2002.

  • Haddad, M. and Harrison, A., “Are there positive spillovers from direct investment? Evidence from panel data for Morroco,” J. Devel. Econ., vol. 42 no. 1, pp. 51–74, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.H., “The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the U.S. manufacturing industries,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 35, pp. 583–606, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. and Raviv, A., “The theory of capital structure,” J. Fin., vol. 46, pp. 297–355, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Prais, S.J., “The analysis of business concentration: A statistical approach,” J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A, vol. 119, pp. 150–191, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Oulton, N., “Growth and size of firms,” Econ. J., vol. 106, pp. 1242–1252, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E. and Oulton, N., “Zipf and the size distribution of firms,” Appl. Econ. Lett., vol. 4, pp. 205–206, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E., “Size and growth of firms,” Economica, vol. 29, pp. 29–39, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E., “Galtonian regression across countries and the convergence of productivity,” Oxford Bull. Econ. Stat., vol. 57, pp. 287–293, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, P.E., “Theories of firms' growth and the generation of jobs,” Rev. Ind. Organ., vol. 17, pp. 229–248, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A., “On the growth of micro and small firms: Evidence from Sweden,” Small Business Econ., vol. 17, pp. 213–228, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, F. and Pain, N., “Inward investment and technical progress in the United Kingdom manufacturing sector,” Scottish J. Pol. Econ., vol. 48 no. 2, pp. 134–147, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymer, S. and Pashigian, P., “Firm size and rate of growth,” J. Polit. Econ., vol. 70, pp. 556–569, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijiri, Y. and Simon, H.A., SkewDistributions and the Size of Business Firms, North-Holland, NewYork, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B., “Selection and evolution of industry,” Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 3–37, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamshad, K.M., “Firm growth and survival: Does ownership structure matter?” J. Econ. Manage. Strat., vol. 3, pp. 521–543, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, V., “Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms,” J. Int. Devel., vol. 12, pp. 343–369, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuria, V., “Liberalization, FDI and productivity spillovers-an analysis of Indian manufacturing firms,” Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 54, pp. 688–718, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C.-S., Mauer, D.S., and Sherman, A.E., “The determinants of corporate liquidity: theory and evidence,” J. Fin. Quan. Anal., vol. 33 no. 3, pp. 335–359, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. and Bassett, G., “Regression quantiles,” Econometrica, vol. 46, pp. 33–50, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. and Bassett, G., “Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles,” Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 43–61, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. and Machado, J.A.F., “Goodness of fit and related processes for quantile regression,” J. Am. Stat. Assoc., vol. 94, pp. 1296–1310, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A., “Technology, market characteristics and spillovers,” J. Devel. Econ., vol. 43, pp. 279–293, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko, A., “Productivity spillovers from competition between local firms and foreign affiliates,” J. Int. Devel., vol. 8, pp. 517–530, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings, J., “The effects of direct foreign investment on domestic firms: evidence from firm level panel data in emerging economies,” William Davidson Institute Working Paper No. 344, 2000.

  • Kumar, M.S., “Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: evidence from the United Kingdom,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 33, pp. 327–338, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, L., Ofek, E., and Stulz, R.M., “Leverage, investment, and firm growth” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 40, pp. 3–29, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E.E., Specification Searches: Ad Hoc Inference with Non-experimental Data, Wiley: New York, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Liu, X., and Parker, D., “Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in the Chinese manufacturing sector,” Econ. Syst., vol. 25, pp. 305–321, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C., and Wei, Y., “Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: evidence from U.K. industry level panel data,” J. Int. Business Stud., vol. 31 no. 3, pp. 407–425, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., and Vivarelli, M., “Does Gibrat's lawhold among young and small firms?” J. Evol. Econ., vol. 13, pp. 213–235, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louri, H., Papanastassiou, M., and Lantouris, J., “FDI in the EU periphery: A multinomial logit analysis of Greek firm strategies,” Regional Studies, vol. 35 no. 5, pp. 419–427, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., “Entry, Gibrat's law, innovation, and the growth of firms,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 52, pp. 1023–1051, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J. and Venables, A., “Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development,” Euro. Econ. Rev., vol. 43, pp. 335–356, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J. and Machado, J.A. F., “Firm start-up size: A conditional quantile approach,” Euro. Econ. Rev., vol. 40, pp. 1305–1323, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., “Sunk costs and entry by small and large plants” in Entry and Market Contestability, Geroski, P.A. and Schwalbach, J. (eds), Blackwell: Oxford, U.K., pp. 49–62, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., “Firm growth during infancy,” Small Business Econ., vol. 6, pp. 27–40, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.C. and Rajan, R.G., “The paradox of liquidity,” Quart. J. Econ., vol. 113 no. 3, pp. 733–771, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S.C., “Determinants of corporate borrowing,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 5, pp. 147–175, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, T.C. and Titman, S., “Financial distress and corporate performance,” J. Fin., vol. 49, pp. 1015–1040, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R., and Williamson, R., “The determinants and implications of corporate cash holdings,” J. Fin. Econ., vol. 52, pp. 3–46, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oulton, N., “Why do foreign-owned firms in the U.K. have higher labour productivity?” in Inward Investment, Technological Change and Growth, Pain, N. (ed.), Palgrave: New York, pp. 122–161, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffermayr, M. and Bellak, C., “Why foreign-owned firms are different: A conceptual framework and empirical evidence from Austria,” Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Discussion Paper No. 115, 2000.

  • Quandt, R.E., “On the size distribution of firms,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 56, pp. 416–432, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, J.M., “Size and growth of firms,” Rev. Econ. Stud., vol. 32, pp. 105–112, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberman, I.H., “On lognormality as a summary measure of concentration,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 57, pp. 807–831, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B.W., Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall: London, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. and Bonini, C.P., “The size distribution of business firm,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 48, pp. 607–617, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., and Whittington, G., “The size and growth of firms,” Rev. Econ. Stud., vol. 42, pp. 15–26, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoholm, F., “Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foreign investment: evidence from establishment data,” J. Devel. Stud., vol. 36, pp. 53–73, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoholm, F., “Productivity growth in Indonesia: the role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment,” Econ. Devel. Cultural Change, vol. 47, pp. 559–584, 1999b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steindl, J., Random Process and the Growth of Firms: A Study of the Pareto Law, Hafner: New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J., “Gibrat's legacy,” J. Econ. Liter., vol. 35, pp. 40–59, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushijima, T., “Internal capital market and the growth and survival of Japanese plants in the United States,” J. Jpn. Int. Econ., 2004 (forthcoming).

  • Variyam, J.N. and Kraybill, D.S., “Empirical evidence on determinants of firm growth,” Econ. Lett., vol. 38, pp. 31–26, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., “The post-entry performance of newsmall firms in German manufacturing industries,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 42, pp. 141–154, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J., “Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance: testing Gibrat's law with establishment data from lower saxony,” Small Business Econ., vol. 4, pp. 125–131, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University Campus, Rio, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece

    Georgios Fotopoulos

  2. Department of Economics, Athens University of Economics and Business, 76 Patission Street, 10434, Athens, Greece

    Helen Louri

Authors
  1. Georgios Fotopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen Louri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fotopoulos, G., Louri, H. Firm Growth and FDI: Are Multinationals Stimulating Local Industrial Development?. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4, 163–189 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JICT.0000047300.88236.f1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JICT.0000047300.88236.f1

Search

Navigation