Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 247–250 | Cite as

A Further Discussion on Revisiting the Classification of Household Composition Among Elderly People

  • Zachary Zimmer

Abstract

This discussion is a reaction to the DeVos article on the classification of households also in the current issue of Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. The need for cross-national and comparative gerontological research is growing. Household composition is a compelling subject for such research, but there is a concurrent increase in the need for flexible and valid classification schemes. The DeVos classification represents an excellent step toward understanding households on a global level. Additional considerations not covered by DeVos include the gender of the coresident child, pseudo-coresidence, and living with grandchildren. These additional issues may complicate classification and, in the end, it is up to the individual researcher to choose schemes based on research questions, guiding theory, and available data. Yer, having a standard as a starting point reduces the complexity of the task of defining a classification scheme to be used comparatively across societies.

Aging family households comparative studies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, S.M. and Cattell, M.G. (1994). Old Age in Global Perspective: Cross-Cultural and Cross-National Views. New York, NY: G.K. Hall & Company.Google Scholar
  2. Anh, T.S, Cuong, B.T., Goodkind, D., & Knodel, J. (1997). Living arrangements, partilineality and sources of support among elderly Vietnamese. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 12:69-88.Google Scholar
  3. Bengtson, V.L., Kim, K.D., Myers, G.C. & Eun K.S. (Eds.). (2000). Aging in East and West: Families, States, and the Elderly. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bongaarts, J. & Zimmer, Z. (2002). Living arrangements of the elderly in the developing world: An analysis of DHS household surveys. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 57:S145-S157.Google Scholar
  5. Chi, I. Chappell, N.L. & Lubben, J. (Eds.). (2001). Elderly Chinese in Pacific Rim Countries: Social Support and Integration. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cowgill, D.O. (1972). Aging Around the World. Belmont, C: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  7. Knodel, J. & Chayovan, N. (1997). Family support and living arrangements of Thai elderly. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 12:1-17.Google Scholar
  8. Lloyd, C.B. & Desai, S. (1992). Children's living arrangements in developing countries. Population Research and Policy Review 11:193-216.Google Scholar
  9. Mason, K.O. (1992). Family change and support of the elderly in Asia: What do we know. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 7:13-32.Google Scholar
  10. National Research Council. (2001). Preparing for an Aging World: The Case for Cross-National Research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Zimmer, Z. & Kim, S.K. (2001). Living arrangements and sociodemographic conditions of older adults in Cambodia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 16:353-381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zachary Zimmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Policy Research DivisionPopulation Council

Personalised recommendations