Skip to main content
Log in

Fiscal Decentralization: A Remedy for Corruption?

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of fiscal decentralization in a country on the level of corruption. Using a tax competition framework with rent-seeking behavior, it is shown theoretically that fiscal decentralization, modeled as an increase in the number of competing jurisdictions, leads to a lower level of corruption. This result is then tested using a small, cross-country data set. The empirical results are not very strong, but they suggest that the hypothesized relationship between decentralization and corruption may indeed exist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Ades, A. and R. Di Tella. (1995). “Competition and Corruption,” Oxford Applied Economics Discussion Paper Series 169.

  • Ades, A. and R. Di Tella. (1997). “National Champions and Corruption: Some Unpleasant Interventionist Arithmetic,” The Economic Journal 107, 1023-1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and B. Weder. (1999). “Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?” NBER Working Paper Series. Working Paper 7108.

  • Bucovetsky, S. (1991). “Asymmetric Tax Competition,” Journal of Urban Economics30, 167-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. and J. MacKinnon. (1993). Estimation and Inference in Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberts, R. W. and T. J. Gronberg. (1988). “Can Competition Among Local Governments Constrain Government Spending?” Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland) 1(24), 2-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. and M. Keen. (1996). “Tax Competition and Leviathan,” European Economic Review 40, 113-134.

  • Fisman, R. and R. Gatti. (2002). “Decentralization and Corruption: Evidence Across Countries,” Journal of Public Economics 83, 325-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, K. F. and E. M. Zampelli. (1989). “Is Leviathan a Mythical Beast?” American Economic Review 79(3), 568-577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giertz, J. F. (1981). “Centralization and Government Budget Size,” Publius (Winter), 119-128.

  • Gupta, S., H. Davoodi and R. Alonso-Terme. (1998). “Does Corruption Affect Income Equality and Poverty?” IMF Working Paper.

  • Hoyt, W. H. (1991). “Poverty Taxation, Nash Equilibrium, and Market Power,” Journal of Urban Economics30, 123-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huther, J. and A. Shah. (1998). “Applying a Simple Measure of Good Governance to the Debate on Fiscal Decentralization.” World Bank Working Papers, Macroeconomics and Growth.

  • Jin, H.,Y. Qian and B. R.Weingast. (2001). “Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style.” Working Paper.

  • Johnston, J. and J. DiNardo. (1997). Econometric Methods, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill International Editions.

  • Leite, C. and J.Weidmann. (1999). “Does Mother Nature Corrupt? Natural Resources, Corruption, and Economic Growth.” IMF Working Paper 99/85.

  • Mauro, P. (1995). “Corruption and Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (August), 681-712.

  • Mauro, P. (1998). “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure,” Journal of Public Economics 69, 263-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. A. (1987). “Searching for Leviathan: Comment and Extension,” American Economic Review 77(1), 198-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1985). “Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study,” American Economic Review 75(4), 748-757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1989). “Searching for Leviathan: A Reply and Some Further Reflections,” American Economic Review 79(3), 578-583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, U. (1999). “On the Determinants of Fiscal Decentralization: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of Public Economics 74, 97-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T., G. Tabellini and F. Trebbi. (2001). “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Center for Economic Studies & Ifo Institute for Economic Research Working Paper No. 416.

  • Schiavo-Campo, G. de Tommaso and A. Mukherjee. (1997). “An International Statistical Survey of Government Employment and Wages.” Background Paper for the World Development Report 1997 (August). World Bank.

  • Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny. (1993). “Corruption,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (August), 599-617.

  • Tanzi, V. (1994). “Corruption Governmental Activities, and Markets.” IMF Working Paper.

  • Tanzi, V. (1998). “Corruption Around the World, Causes, Consequences, Scopes and Cures,” IMF Staff Papers 45(4), 559-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. and H. Davoodi. (1997). “Corruption, Public Investment and Growth,” IMF Working Paper.

  • Taylor, C. L. and M. C. Hudson. (1972). World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators. Ann Arbor, MI: ICSPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy 64, 416-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, D. (2000). “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study,” Journal of Public Economics 76, 399-457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ul Haque, N. and R. Sahay. (1996). “Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Government Wage Cuts Close Budget Deficits? Costs of Corruption,” IMF Working Staff Papers43(4), 754-778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rijckeghem, C. and B. Weder. (1997). “Corruption and the Rate of Temptation: Do Low Wages in the Civil Service Cause Corruption?” IMF Working Paper 97/73.

  • Wasylenko, M. (1987). “Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development,” Public Budgeting & Finance (Winter), 57-71.

  • Wildasin, D. E. (1988). “Nash Equilibria in Models of Fiscal Competition,” Journal of Public Economics 35, 229-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (1986). “A Theory of Interregional Tax Competition,” Journal of Public Economics 19, 296-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. D. (1999). “Theories of Tax Competition,” National Tax Journal52(2), 269-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zax, J. S. (1989). “Is There a Leviathan in Your Neighborhood?” American Economic Review 79(3), 560-567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. R. and P. Mieszkowski. (1986). “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and the Underprovision of Local Public Goods,” Journal of Urban Economics 19, 356-370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arikan, G.G. Fiscal Decentralization: A Remedy for Corruption?. International Tax and Public Finance 11, 175–195 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000011399.00053.a1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000011399.00053.a1

Navigation