Abstract
In this paper, we show that the filters and local filters are equivalent in pseudo-effect algebras. Ideals and local ideals and generalized ideals are equivalent in the pseudo-effect algebras, too.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Foulis, D. J. and Bennett, M. K. (1994). Effect algebras and unsharp quantum logics. Foundations of Physics 24, 1331–1352.
Foulis, D. J., Greechie, R., and Ruttimann, G. (1992). Filters and supports in orthoalgebras. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 31, 789–802.
Dvurecenskij, A. and Vetterlein, T. (2001). Pseudoeffect algebras (I). Basic properties. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 40, 685–701.
Jing, Wu. (2003). Maps on Operator Algebras and Quantum Logics, PhD Thesis, Zhejiang University, People's Republic of China.
Ma, Zhihao, Wu, Junde, and Lu, Shijie. (2004). Pseudo-effect algebras and Pseudo-difference posets. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43(6), 1445–1451.
Miklos, R. (1998). Quantum Logics and Algebraic Approach, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
Shang, Yun and Li, Yongming. (2003). Generalized ideals in orthoalgebras. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 42, 2823–2829.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Z., Wu, J. & Lu, S. Ideals and Filters in Pseudo-Effect Algebras. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 43, 1445–1451 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048628.89053.de
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJTP.0000048628.89053.de