Abstract
Taxonomy has a well-defined role, which is much more than simply stamp-collecting and pigeon-holing. Species are the units of classification, biogeography and conservation; as such they must be defined as objectively as possible. The biological species concept, still widely used in biology, though predominantly by non-taxonomists and all too often misunderstood, is a process-based concept, which offers no criterion for the classification of allopatric populations beyond inference and hypothesis. The phylogenetic species concept—a pattern-based concept—is as nearly objective as we are likely to get. Amount of difference is not a criterion for recognizing species. It is not possible to insist on monophyly at the specific level, but it is mandatory for the higher categories (genus, family, etc.). The rank we assign to a given supraspecific category should be determined by its time depth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Avise, J. C., and Johns, G. C. (1999). Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96: 7358–7363.
Avise, J. C., Walker, D., and Johns, G. C. (1998). Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography. Proc. R. Sco. Lond.B, 265: 1707–1712.
Bearder, S. K., Honess, P. E., and Ambrose, L. (1995). Species diversity among galagos with special reference to mate recognition. In Alterman, L., Izard, M. K., and Doyle, G. A. (eds.), Creatures of the Dark: The Nocturnal Prosimians, Plenum, New York, pp. 331–352.
Bearder, S. K., Honess, P. E., Bayes, M., Ambrose, L., and Anderson, M. (1996). Assessing galago diversity-a call for help. Afr. Primates 2(1): 11–15.
Bradley, R. D., and Baker, R. J. (2001). A test of the genetic species concept: Cytochrome-bsequences and mammals. J. Mamm. 82: 960–973.
Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr. Ornithol. 1: 159–187.
Cracraft, J. (1997). Species concepts in systematics and conservation biology-an ornithological viewpoint. In Claridge, M. F., Dawah, A. A., and Wilson, M. R. (eds.), Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 325–339.
de Queiroz, K., and Donoghue, M. J. (1988). Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4: 317–338.
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. (1992). Phylogenetic taxonomy. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 449–480.
Fooden, J. (1976). Provisional classification and key to living species of macaques (Primates: Macaca). Folia primatol. 25: 225–236.
Gebo, D. L., MacLatchy, L., Kityo, R., Deino, A., Kingston, J., and Pilbeam, D. (1997). A Hominoid genus from the early Miocene of Uganda. Science 276: 401–404.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1966). On psychologism in the logic of taxonomic controversies. Syst. Zool. 15: 207–215.
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Syst. Zool. 23: 536–544.
Goodman, M., Porter, C. A., Czelusniak, J., Page, S. L., Schneider, H., Shoshani, J., Gunnell, G., and Groves, C. P. (1998). Toward a phylogenetic classification of primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 9: 585–598.
Groves, C. P. (1986). Systematics of the Great Apes. In Swindler, D. R., and Erwin, J. (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol.1: Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 187–217.
Groves, C. P. (1989). A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Groves, C. P. (2001a). Primate Taxonomy, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Groves, C. P. (2001b). Why taxonomic stability is a bad idea, or why are there so few species of primates (or are there?). Evol. Anthropol. 10: 192–198.
Harrison, R. G. (1998). Linking evolutionary patterns and processes: The relevance of species concepts for the study of speciation. In Howard, D. J., and Berlocher, S. H. (eds.), Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 19–31.
Hayasaka, K., Fuji, K., and Horai, S. (1996). Molecular phylogeny of macaques: Implications of nucleotide sequences from an 896-base pair region of mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13: 1044–1053.
Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: The denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., and Wilson, M. R. (eds.), Species: The Units of Biodiversity, Chapman and Hall, New York.
Mayr, E. (1940). Speciation phenomena in birds. Am. Nat. 74: 249–278.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nixon, K. C., and Carpenter, J. M. (2000). On the other "phylogenetic systematics." Cladistics 16: 298–318.
Paterson, H. E. (1978). More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci. 14: 369–371.
Paterson, H. E. (1985). The recognition concept of species. In Vrba, E. S. (ed.), Species and Speciation, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, South Africa (Monograph No. 4), xviii C 176 pp.
Rylands, A. B., Schneider, H., Langguth, A., Mittermeier, R. A. Groves, C. P., and Rodríguez-Luna, E. (2000). An assessment of the diversity of New World primates. Neotrop. Primates 8: 61–93.
Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.
Templeton, A. R. (1989). The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic perspective. In Otte, D., and Endler, J. A. (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Tosi, A. J., Morales, J. C., and Melnick, D. J. (2000). Comparison of Ychromosome and mtDNA phylogenies leads to unique inferences of macaque evolutionary history. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 17: 133–144.
Van Roosmalen, M. G. M., van Roosmalen, T., Mittermeier, R. A., and Rylands, A. B. (2000). Two new species of marmosets, genus CallithrixErxleben, 1777 (Callitrichidae, Primates), from the Tapajós/Madeira interfluvium, South Central Amazonia, Brazil. Neotrop. Pri-mates 8: 2–18.
Van Valen, L. (1976). Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233–239.
Verheyen, W. N. (1962). —Contribution ` a la craniologie comparée des Primates: les genres ColobusIlliger 1811 et CercopithecusLinnaeus 1758. Ann. K. Mus. Midden-Afrika, Zool. Wet. 105, ix C 255 pp.
Wood, B., and M. Collard (1999). The human genus. Science 284: 65–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groves, C. The What, Why and How of Primate Taxonomy. International Journal of Primatology 25, 1105–1126 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000043354.36778.55
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000043354.36778.55