Advertisement

International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1245–1250 | Cite as

Fatal Attack on an Adult Female Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus: Implications for Female Dispersal in Female-Bonded Societies

  • Hallam F. P. Payne
  • Michael J. Lawes
  • S. Peter Henzi
Article

Abstract

Female dispersal is uncommon among female-bonded primate societies, even though at times there may be considerable incentive to do so, e.g., to avoid potentially infanticidal males. Predation risk and the advantages of sharing the costs of group living, such as infanticide and resource defense, with close kin are assumed to limit female dispersal. However, we show that these costs may not be as important as the risks associated with integration into a new group in female-bonded societies. We report the death of a potentially dispersing solitary Samango (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus). She was unrelated to the females of a single group that killed her, and her death was not in the context of intergroup conflict or territorial defense. This fatal conflict is in contrast to the tolerance of female dispersal displayed by many folivorous and non-female-bonded primate species. In such non-female-bonded societies, there is less indirect fitness advantage to remaining in the natal group or to cooperate with kin to defend food patches, and consequently the risk of being rejected by another group is much reduced. Our observations show that dispersal between groups may be costly for solitary and unfamiliar females in a female-bonded society.

guenon female-bonded societies infanticide female competition blue monkey dispersal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cords, M. (2002). Friendship among adult female blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis). Behaviour 139: 291-314.Google Scholar
  2. Crockett, C. M. (1984). Emigration by female red howler monkeys and the case for female competition. In Small, M. F. (ed.), Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists, Alan R Liss, New York, pp. 159-173.Google Scholar
  3. Glander, K. E. (1984). Group composition in mantled howling monkeys. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 53: 25-36.Google Scholar
  4. Henzi, S. P., Lycett, J. E., and Piper, S. E. (1997). Fission and troop size in a mountain baboon population. Anim. Behav. 53: 525-535.Google Scholar
  5. Hrdy, S. B. (1977). The Langurs of Abu: Female and Male Strategies of Reproduction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 61.Google Scholar
  6. Isbell, L. A., and van Vuren, D. (1996). Differential costs of locational and social dispersal and their consequences for female group-living primates. Behaviour 133: 1-36.Google Scholar
  7. Lawes, M. J., and Henzi, S. P. (1995). Inter-group encounters in blue monkeys: How territorial must a territorial species be? Anim. Behav. 49: 240-243.Google Scholar
  8. Macleod, M. C. (2000). The Reproductive Strategies of Samango Monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus), PhD Thesis, University of Surrey, Roehampton, p. 273.Google Scholar
  9. Macleod, M. C., Ross, C., and Lawes, M. J. (2002). Costs and benefits of alternative mating strategies in blue monkey males. In Glenn, M. E., and Cords, M. (Eds.),The Guenons: Diversity and Adaptation in African Monkeys, Kluwer Academic, New York, pp. 199-212.Google Scholar
  10. Makwana, S. C., and Advani, R. (1981). Social changes in the hanuman langur, Presbytis entellus, around Jodphur. J. Bombay. Nat. Hist. Soc. 78: 152-154.Google Scholar
  11. Marler, P. (1973) A comparison of vocalizations of red-tailed monkeys and blue monkeys, Cercopithecus ascanius and C. mitis, in Uganda. Z. Tierpsychol. 33: 223-247.Google Scholar
  12. McGraw, W. S., Plavcan, J. M., and Adachi-Kanazawa, K. (2002). Adult female Cercopithecus diana employ canine teeth to kill another adult female C. diana. Int. J. Primatol. 23: 1301-1308.Google Scholar
  13. Nunn, C. L., and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Social evolution in primates: The relative roles of ecology and intersexual conflict. In van Schaik, C. P., and Jansen, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by Males and Its Implications, Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 388-420.Google Scholar
  14. Payne, H. F. P., Lawes, M. J., and Henzi, S. P. (2003). Competition and the exchange of grooming among female samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis erythrarchus). Behaviour 140: 453-471.Google Scholar
  15. Pusey, A. E., and Packer, C. (1987). Dispersal and philopatry. In Smuts, B. B., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (Eds.), Primate Societies, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 250-266.Google Scholar
  16. Rudran, R. (1973). Adult male replacement in one-male troops of purple-faced langurs (Presbytis senex senex) and its effect on population structure. Folia Primatol. 19: 166-192.Google Scholar
  17. Sterck, E. H. M. (1997). Determinants of female dispersal in Thomas's langurs. Am. J. Primatol. 42: 179-198.Google Scholar
  18. Sterck, E. H. M., and Korstjens, A. H. (2000). Female dispersal and infanticide avoidance in primates. In van Schaik, C. P., and Jansen, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by Males and Its Implications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 293-321.Google Scholar
  19. Struhsaker, T. T. (1975). The Red Colobus Monkey, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 311.Google Scholar
  20. van Schaik, C. P. (1983). Why are diurnal primates living in groups? Behaviour 87: 120-144.Google Scholar
  21. van Schaik, C. P., and Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Infanticide risk and the evolution of male-female association in primates. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1687-1694.Google Scholar
  22. van Schaik, C. P., and Jansen, C. H. (2000). Infanticide by Males and Its Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p. 584.Google Scholar
  23. Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour 75: 262-300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hallam F. P. Payne
    • 1
  • Michael J. Lawes
    • 1
  • S. Peter Henzi
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Botany and ZoologyUniversity of NatalScottsvilleSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of NatalSchool of Psychology, Social Anthropology and Social WorkScottsvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations