Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual Dichromatism and Female Preference in Eulemur fulvus Subspecies

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We experimentally tested the hypothesis that sexual dichromatism in the subspecies of Eulemur fulvus is the evolutionary result of female preference for brightly colored males. Ten female lemurs representing 6 different subspecies of Eulemur fulvus were subjects in the experiment; controls were 4 females of non-sexually dichromatic lemurid taxa. For each taxon we presented photographs of the face of a male of that taxon whose colors had been digitally altered to make him less and more colourful. Median viewing times of the pooled female Eulemur fulvus are significantly correlated with colorfulness. Viewing times in the control females are not correlated with color or brightness of the stimulus photographs. We concluded that the females of the Eulemur fulvus sspp. preferred to view photographs of more colorful males, which is consistent with the predictions of sexual selection theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersson, M. (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818-820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev, A. V., and Hill, G. E. (2000). Evolution of sexual dichromatism: Contribution of carotenoid-versus melanin-based coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 153-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierens De Haan, J. A., and Frima, M. J. (1930). Versuche ueber den Farbensinn der Lemuren. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 12: 603-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, B., and Jacobs, G. H. (1985). Colour vision in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). Brain Behav. Evol. 26: 154-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovet, D., and Vauclair, J. (2000). Picture recognition in animals and humans. Behav. Brain Res. 109: 143-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coss, R. G. (1978). Perceptual determinants of gaze aversion by the lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), the role of two facing eyes. Behaviour 64: 248-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill, I. C., Bennett, A. T. D., Partridge, J. C., and Maier, E. J. (1999). Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. Am. Nat. 153: 183-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate Sexuality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24: 581-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerald, M. (2001). Primate color predicts social status and aggressive outcome. Anim. Behav. 61: 559-566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosset, D., and Roeder, J-J. (2000). Colour and shape discrimination in black lemurs (Eulemur macaco). Folia Primatol. 71: 173-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D., and Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218: 384-387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. W., and Bradbury, J. W. (1991). Sexual selection. In Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (Eds.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 203-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, G. H., and Deegan, J. F. (1993). Photopigments underlying color vision in ringtail lemurs (Lemur catta) and brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus). Am. J. Primatol. 30: 243-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (1990). The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. Am. J. Primatol. 21: 201-214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (1996). Intrasexual selection and phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of sexual canine dimorphism in strepsirhine primates. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 43-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (2000). Causes and consequences of unusual sex ratios among lemurs. In Kappeler, P. M. (ed.), Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 55-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., Tattersall, I., Konstant, W. R., Meyers, D. M., and Mast, R. B. (1994). Lemurs of Madagascar, Conservation International, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostner, J., and Kappeler, P. M. (1999). Central males instead of multiple pairs in redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus (Primates, Lemuridae)? Anim. Behav. 58: 1069-1078.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overdorff, D. J. (1998). Are Eulemur species pair-bonded? Social organisation and mating strategies in Eulemur fulvus rufus from 1988–1995 in southeast Madagascar. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 105: 153-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A. (2002). Sexual selection and mate choice. Int. J. Primatol. 23: 877-904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. E., and Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Divergent systems of agonistic behaviour in lemurid primates. Behaviour 134: 225-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. E., and McGlynn, C. (1997). Special relationships instead of female dominance for redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus. Am. J. Primatol. 43: 239-258

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. E., and Weiss, M. L. (1991). Female mate choice, male migration, and the threat of infanticide in ringtailed lemurs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 141-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie, M., Halliday, T. R., and Sanders, C. (1991). Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim. Behav. 41: 323-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, G. (1998). The Evolution of Pelage Colouration in Primates, PhD Thesis, University of Durham, Durham. UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., and Dixson, A. F. (2001). Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). are associated with gain and loss of alpha status. Horm. Behav. 39: 177-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedd, D. H., and Macedonia, J. M. (1991). Metachromism and its phylogenetic implications for the genus Eulemur (Prosimii: Lemuridae). Folia Primatol. 57: 221-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulmer, F. A. (1964). Sexual dichromatism in the irides of Lemur catta. J. Mammal. 45: 490

    Google Scholar 

  • Vick, L. G., and Pereira, M. E. (1989). Episodic targeting aggression and the histories of Lemur social groups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 3-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, B., and Kappeler, P. M. (2002). The effects of sexual selection and life history on the genetic structure of redfronted lemur, Eulemur fulvus rufus, groups. Anim. Behav. 64: 557-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205-214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. R. Hosey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, V.J., Hosey, G.R. Sexual Dichromatism and Female Preference in Eulemur fulvus Subspecies. International Journal of Primatology 24, 1177–1188 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000005986.21477.ad

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJOP.0000005986.21477.ad

Navigation