International Journal of Primatology

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 1177–1188 | Cite as

Sexual Dichromatism and Female Preference in Eulemur fulvus Subspecies

  • V. J. Cooper
  • G. R. HoseyEmail author


We experimentally tested the hypothesis that sexual dichromatism in the subspecies of Eulemur fulvus is the evolutionary result of female preference for brightly colored males. Ten female lemurs representing 6 different subspecies of Eulemur fulvus were subjects in the experiment; controls were 4 females of non-sexually dichromatic lemurid taxa. For each taxon we presented photographs of the face of a male of that taxon whose colors had been digitally altered to make him less and more colourful. Median viewing times of the pooled female Eulemur fulvus are significantly correlated with colorfulness. Viewing times in the control females are not correlated with color or brightness of the stimulus photographs. We concluded that the females of the Eulemur fulvus sspp. preferred to view photographs of more colorful males, which is consistent with the predictions of sexual selection theory.

Eulemur fulvus sexual dichromatism female preference mate choice lemurs color 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersson, M. (1982). Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299: 818-820.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  3. Badyaev, A. V., and Hill, G. E. (2000). Evolution of sexual dichromatism: Contribution of carotenoid-versus melanin-based coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 153-172.Google Scholar
  4. Bierens De Haan, J. A., and Frima, M. J. (1930). Versuche ueber den Farbensinn der Lemuren. Z. Vergl. Physiol. 12: 603-631.Google Scholar
  5. Blakeslee, B., and Jacobs, G. H. (1985). Colour vision in the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta). Brain Behav. Evol. 26: 154-166.Google Scholar
  6. Bovet, D., and Vauclair, J. (2000). Picture recognition in animals and humans. Behav. Brain Res. 109: 143-165.Google Scholar
  7. Coss, R. G. (1978). Perceptual determinants of gaze aversion by the lesser mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), the role of two facing eyes. Behaviour 64: 248-270.Google Scholar
  8. Cuthill, I. C., Bennett, A. T. D., Partridge, J. C., and Maier, E. J. (1999). Plumage reflectance and the objective assessment of avian sexual dichromatism. Am. Nat. 153: 183-200.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  10. Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate Sexuality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24: 581-604.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Gerald, M. (2001). Primate color predicts social status and aggressive outcome. Anim. Behav. 61: 559-566.Google Scholar
  14. Gosset, D., and Roeder, J-J. (2000). Colour and shape discrimination in black lemurs (Eulemur macaco). Folia Primatol. 71: 173-176.Google Scholar
  15. Hamilton, W. D., and Zuk, M. (1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds: A role for parasites? Science 218: 384-387.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, P. W., and Bradbury, J. W. (1991). Sexual selection. In Krebs, J. R., and Davies, N. B. (Eds.). Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 3rd edn., Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 203-233.Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs, G. H., and Deegan, J. F. (1993). Photopigments underlying color vision in ringtail lemurs (Lemur catta) and brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus). Am. J. Primatol. 30: 243-256.Google Scholar
  18. Kappeler, P. M. (1990). The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. Am. J. Primatol. 21: 201-214.Google Scholar
  19. Kappeler, P. M. (1996). Intrasexual selection and phylogenetic constraints in the evolution of sexual canine dimorphism in strepsirhine primates. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 43-65.Google Scholar
  20. Kappeler, P. M. (2000). Causes and consequences of unusual sex ratios among lemurs. In Kappeler, P. M. (ed.), Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 55-63.Google Scholar
  21. Mittermeier, R. A., Tattersall, I., Konstant, W. R., Meyers, D. M., and Mast, R. B. (1994). Lemurs of Madagascar, Conservation International, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Ostner, J., and Kappeler, P. M. (1999). Central males instead of multiple pairs in redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus (Primates, Lemuridae)? Anim. Behav. 58: 1069-1078.Google Scholar
  23. Overdorff, D. J. (1998). Are Eulemur species pair-bonded? Social organisation and mating strategies in Eulemur fulvus rufus from 1988–1995 in southeast Madagascar. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 105: 153-166.Google Scholar
  24. Paul, A. (2002). Sexual selection and mate choice. Int. J. Primatol. 23: 877-904.Google Scholar
  25. Pereira, M. E., and Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Divergent systems of agonistic behaviour in lemurid primates. Behaviour 134: 225-274.Google Scholar
  26. Pereira, M. E., and McGlynn, C. (1997). Special relationships instead of female dominance for redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus. Am. J. Primatol. 43: 239-258Google Scholar
  27. Pereira, M. E., and Weiss, M. L. (1991). Female mate choice, male migration, and the threat of infanticide in ringtailed lemurs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 141-152.Google Scholar
  28. Petrie, M., Halliday, T. R., and Sanders, C. (1991). Peahens prefer peacocks with elaborate trains. Anim. Behav. 41: 323-331.Google Scholar
  29. Regan, G. (1998). The Evolution of Pelage Colouration in Primates, PhD Thesis, University of Durham, Durham. UK.Google Scholar
  30. Setchell, J. M., and Dixson, A. F. (2001). Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). are associated with gain and loss of alpha status. Horm. Behav. 39: 177-184.Google Scholar
  31. Shedd, D. H., and Macedonia, J. M. (1991). Metachromism and its phylogenetic implications for the genus Eulemur (Prosimii: Lemuridae). Folia Primatol. 57: 221-231.Google Scholar
  32. Ulmer, F. A. (1964). Sexual dichromatism in the irides of Lemur catta. J. Mammal. 45: 490Google Scholar
  33. Vick, L. G., and Pereira, M. E. (1989). Episodic targeting aggression and the histories of Lemur social groups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 3-12.Google Scholar
  34. Wimmer, B., and Kappeler, P. M. (2002). The effects of sexual selection and life history on the genetic structure of redfronted lemur, Eulemur fulvus rufus, groups. Anim. Behav. 64: 557-568.Google Scholar
  35. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—A selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205-214.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology & Life SciencesBolton InstituteBoltonUK

Personalised recommendations