Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of Satisfaction and Perceived Learning of Science in Different Distance Education Delivery Modes for Rural Elementary School Teachers Involved in a Professional Development Project

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Science Co-op is a local systemic change project that connects eight regional clusters of elementary schools in rural Missouri and Iowa in the USA. These clusters are comprised of 38 school districts distributed over 40,000 square miles and include more than 1,400 teachers and 20,000 elementary school students. The project stresses inquiry science in the classroom and involves investigating science ideas using a constructivist approach and cross-curricular connections. Within the frameworks of the Science Co-op project a technology known as Interactive Television (ITV) allows for almost real-time interaction (a 3–5 second delay) within the state boundaries of Missouri and Iowa, respectively. The primary goals of the ITV sessions are to enhance the science content and science pedagogical knowledge among the population of elementary school teachers that they may have lacked in their prior education, and to reinforce and extend instructional strategies emphasized in this local systemic change project. In this study the participants' self-reported learning and reactions to live ITV sessions and videotaped, delayed broadcast of ITV sessions were compared. Regression analysis results show teaching experience's influence on overall satisfaction with ITV (p<0.05) while mode attended, perceived technical difficulty, preferred mode, and perceived new skills or content learned in the session entered the regression equation at p=.000. Further t-tests suggested p>0.05 for perceived new skills and content learned on the different modes of communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, T. & Kanuka, H. (1997). On-line forums: New platforms for professional development and group collaboration. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(3).

  • Appleton, K. (1992). Discipline knowledge and confidence to teach science: Selfperceptions of primary teacher education students. Research in Science Education, 22, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N.W. (1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.S. (1960). Then process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullough, R. et al. (1997). Long-term PDS development in research universities and the clinicalization of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(2), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEO Forum (2000, June). The power of digital learning: Integrating digital content (Year Three Report). Washington, DC.

  • Corcoran, T.B., Shields, P.M. & Zucker, A.A. (1998). Evaluation of NSF's Statewide Systemic Reform Initiatives (SSI) Program: The SSIs and professional development for teachers. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (1996). Continuing professional development: A practical guide for teachers and schools. London, UK: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, C. (1999). The role of emerging technologies for knowledge mobilization, dissemination, and use in education. Washington, DC.: United States Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, M. (2000). Content and pedagogy: Intersection in the NSTA standards for science teacher education. Retrieved May 3, 2002, from http://www.msu.edu/~dugganha/ PCK.htm

  • Fulton, K. (1996). Moving from boxes and wires to 21st century teaching. T.H.E. Journal, 24(4), 76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F. & Suk Yoon, K. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Education Research Journal, 38, 915–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson, G. & Lalik, R. (1993). Reinterpreting the learning cycle from a social constructivist perspective: A qualitative study of teachers' beliefs and practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, R.M. (1991, February 25). Why my kids hate science. Newsweek, 7.

  • Honey, M. & Henriquez, A. (1993). Telecommunication and k-12 educators: Findings from a national survey. Bank Street College of Education Center for Technology in Education.

  • Kahle, J., Anderson, A. & Damjanovic, A. (1991). A comparison of elementary teacher attitudes and skills in teaching science in Australia and the United States. Research in Science Education, 21, 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M.M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research monograph No. 13). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezberg, A.K. (1999). The role of regional accreditation in providing quality control for Distance Educationin the United States. Staff and Educational Development International, 3(3), 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A. & McLaughlin, M.W. (1992). Networks for educational change: Powerful and problematic. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 673–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S. & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G.R. (2001). Theory, research and practice. Education at a distance, 15(40).

  • Mose, D. & Tucker, M. (1993). An experiment in distance learning in geology. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science, 12(1), 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it's too late. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation (2003). Division of elementary, secondary, and informal education-teacher enhancement. Retrieved March 20, 2002, from http://www.nsf.gov/ od/lpa/news/publicat/nsf013/ehr/esie.htm

  • National Science Teachers Association (1997). NSTA pathways to the science standards: Guidelines for moving the vision into practice, Elementary edition. Paper presented at the NSTA,Washington, DC.

  • NCTAF. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. The National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.

  • Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, R. (2002). An overview of America's education agenda. Phi Beta Kappan, 83(9), 708–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. (1999). Interaction in distance education: The critical conversation. Educational Technology Review, 12, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, R. (2003). "Real world" connections through videoconferencing-we're closer than you think! TechTrends, 44(6), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renyi, J. (1996). Teachers take charge of their learning. Transforming professional development for student success [and] executive summary. ERIC Document Reproduction Service, No. ED 401 251.

  • Rogers, B. (1997). How to develop a general biology course for interactive television. The American Biology Teacher, 59(7), 420–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. (1987). Education reform strategies: Will they increase teacher commitment? American Journal of Education, 95, 534–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.C. (2000). Content and pedagogical content knowledge for elementary science teacher educators: Knowing our students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D. (1994). A paradigm shift in staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephans, J. (1994). Targeting students' misconceptions: Physical science activities using the conceptual change model. Riverview, FL: Idea Factory.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Education (2002). Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge: The secretary's annual report on teacher quality. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy, Planning, and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, E. & Kellugh, R. (1997). Science for the elementary and middle school, 5th edn. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. et al. (1995). Distance education as a future trend for pre-and in-service education. ERIC Document Reproduction Services, No. 381 563.

  • Yates, S. & Goodrum, D. (1990). How confident are primary teachers in teaching science? Research in Science Education, 20, 300–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigmarmi, P., Betz, L. & Jennings, D. (1977). Teachers' preferences in and perceptions of inservice. Educational Leadership, 34, 545–551.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, North Carolina State University, 2301 Stinson Drive, Box, 7801, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7801, U.S.A. E-mail:

    Leonard A. Annetta

  2. Lycoming College, Williamsport, PA, 17701, USA

    Leonard A. Annetta & Justin C. Matus

  3. College of Education, North Carolina State University, 2301 Stinson Drive, Box, 7801, Raleigh, NC, 27695-7801, U.S.A. E-mail:

    Justin C. Matus

Authors
  1. Leonard A. Annetta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Justin C. Matus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin C. Matus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annetta, L.A., Matus, J.C. Analysis of Satisfaction and Perceived Learning of Science in Different Distance Education Delivery Modes for Rural Elementary School Teachers Involved in a Professional Development Project. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1, 311–331 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJMA.0000039912.97092.4b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJMA.0000039912.97092.4b

Keywords

Search

Navigation