Skip to main content
Log in

The Colonization Response of Lotic Chironomid Larvae to Substrate Size and Heterogeneity

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The colonization patterns of larval chironomid midges were studied on clean sieved sediments (range 0.25-4.0 mm; pure and mixed) placed in a third order stream in NW Pennsylvania, USA. Chironomid abundance and species richness were significantly different among four sites for homogeneous and mixed sediments. Species richness increased with sediment particle size. Fourteen of the 18 most common species had significant substrate preferences. The interpretation of two cluster analyses of sediment samples indicated two assemblages of chironomid species, each of which appeared to correlate with particular sediments, indicating some assemblage level sediment preference. Sediment size, but not heterogeneity, appears to be a strong factor in the species richness pattern of the community, and in the microhabitat choices of individual chironomid species, in this sandy environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J. D., 1975. The distributional ecology of benthic insects in Cement Creek, Colorado. Ecology 56: 1040-1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. D., 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, P. D., P. S. Cranston & L. C. V. Pinder (eds), 1995. The Chironomidae: Biology and Ecology of Non-biting Midges. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barmuta, L. A., 1989. Habitat patchiness and macrobenthic community structure in an upland stream in temperate Victoria, Australia. Freshwater Biology 21: 223-236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzanti, M., 2000. Ecological requirements of chironomids (Diptera: Chironomidae) on the soft bottom of the River Arrone, central Italy. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 15: 397-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, D. J., 1977. Sources and Methods in Geography, Sediments. Butterworths, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloner, D. T. & R. S. Wotton, 1996. Substratum preferences by larvae of three species of midge (Diptera: Chironomidae).Hydrobiologia 339: 93-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W. P., 1971. Energy flow in a woodland stream ecosystem:I. Tissue support trophic structure of the autumnal community. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 68: 232-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, W. P. & L. C. Ferrington Jr., 1996. Chironomidae. In Merritt, R.W. & K.W. Cummins (eds), An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd edn. Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, IA, USA: 635-754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culp, J. M., S. J. Walde & R. W. Davies, 1983. Relative importance of substrate particle size and detritus to stream benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40: 1568-1574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W. & G. H. Lauff, 1969. The influence of substrate particle size on the microdistribution of stream macrobenthos. Hydrobiologia 34: 145-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarch, B. G. E., 1976. Spatial and temporal patterns in macrobenthic stream diversity. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 33: 1261-1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M., 1975. Assembly of species communities. In Cody, M. L. & J. M. Diamond (eds), Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA: 342-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeg, T. J., R. Marchant, M. Douglas & P. S. Lake, 1989. Experimental colonization of sand, gravel and stones by macroinvertebrates in the Acheron River, southeastern Australia. Freshwater Biology 22: 57-64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, J. A., 1993. Resolution of the data transformation problem in field biology. In Use of Biostatistics in Benthic Ecological Studies. Sixth Annual Technical Information Workshop. North American Benthological Society, 810 East 10th Street, Lawrence, KS 66044: 32-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutilleul, P., 1993. Spatial heterogeneity and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecology 74: 1646-1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epler, J. H., 2001. Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina. Version 1.0 <http://www.esb.enr.state.nc.us/BAUwww/Chironomid.html>

  • Erman, D. C. & N. A. Erman, 1984. The response of stream macroinvertebrates to substrate size and heterogeneity. Hydrobiologia 108: 75-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, M. P. & J. R. Holomuzki, 2003. Spatial variability and assemblage structure of stream hydropsychid caddisflies. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21:576-588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gayraud, S. & M. Philippe, 2001. Does subsurface interstitial space influence general features and morphological traits of the benthic macroinvertebrate community in streams? Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 151: 667-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, C. P., 1984. Substrate associations and longitudinal distributions in species of Ephemerellidae (Ephemeroptera: Insecta) from western Oregon. Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 3: 181-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N., 1970. The ecology of running waters. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S., D. K. Shiozawa & J.M. Schmid-Araya, 1999. Benthic invertebrates of a large, sandy river system: the Green and Colorado Rivers of Canyonlands National Park, Utah. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie 147: 91-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, S. L., 1992. Competition and the structure of a benthic stream community. Ecological Monographs 62: 165-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R., 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H. & J. W. MacArthur, 1961. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42: 594-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. J., 1992. Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: a review of processes and patterns. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 617-628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, S. J., 1988. The micro-distribution of aquatic macroinvertebrates in the Wye river system: the result of abiotic or biotic factors? Freshwater Biology 20: 241-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, L. C. V., 1980. Spatial distribution of Chironomidae in an English chalk stream. In Murray, D. V. (ed.), Chironomidae: Ecology, Systematics, Cytology and Physiology. Pergamon Press, Oxford. UK: 153-162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeni, C. F. & G. W. Minshall, 1977. Factors affecting microdistribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29: 33-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. G., 1985. A multivariate study of resource partitioning in soft bottom lotic Chironomidae. Hydrobiologia 126: 275-285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reice, S. R., 1980. The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream. Ecology 61: 580-590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, L. P., 1994. Chironomid microdistribution in gravel of an English chalk river. Freshwater Biology 32: 533-551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selley, R. C., 1988. Applied Sedimentology. Academic Press, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, K. W. & R. W. Bode, 1980. Common larvae of Chironomidae (Diptera) from New York state streams and rivers with particular reference to the fauna of artificial substrates. New York State Museum, State University of New York, State Education Department. Albany, New York, Bulletin 439: 109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. W.H. Freeman and Co, 3rd edn. New York, NY, USA. SPSS, 1999. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences: Version 10.0.5 for Windows. SPSS Inc., 233 S. Wacker Drive, 11th Floor, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokeshi, M., 1994. Biodiversity in aquatic systems: some conceptual and theoretical issues. In Yasunu, M. & M. M. Watanabe (eds), Biodiversity: Its Complexity and Role. Global Environmental Forum. Tokyo, Japan: 211-275.

  • Tokeshi, M. & L. C. V. Pinder, 1986. Dispersion of epiphytic chironomid larvae and the probability of random colonization. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologia 71:613-620.

  • Wene, G., 1940. The soil as an ecological factor in the abundance of aquatic chironomid larvae. Ohio Journal of Science 40: 193-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth, C.K., 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of Geology 30: 377-392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiderholm, T. (ed.), 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region, Keys and Diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 19: 1-457.

  • Williams, D. D., 1980. Some relationships between stream benthos and substrate heterogeneity. Limnology and Oceanography 21: 166-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. D. & M. R. Smith, 1996. Colonization dynamics of river benthos in response to local changes in bed characteristics. Freshwater Biology 36: 237-248.

  • Winterbottom, J. H., S. E. Orton & A. G. Hildrew, 1997. Field experiments on the mobility of benthic invertebrates in a southern English stream. Freshwater Biology 38: 37-47.

  • Wise, D. H. & M. C. Molles Jr., 1979. Colonization of artificial substrates by stream insects: influence of substrate size and diversity. Hydrobiologia 65: 69-74.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rae, J.G. The Colonization Response of Lotic Chironomid Larvae to Substrate Size and Heterogeneity. Hydrobiologia 524, 115–124 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000036126.50550.13

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000036126.50550.13

Navigation