Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of stream habitat and water quality on macroinvertebrate communities in degraded streams of northwest Mississippi

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Streams in the loess hills of northwest Mississippi have undergone dramatic physical changes since European settlement and both physical and water quality processes may play a role in influencing biotic communities of these stream systems. The objectives of this study were to identify the response of macroinvertebrate taxa to water quality and habitat parameters in streams of northwest Mississippi, examine the efficacy of an a priori classification system of stream channel evolution and condition class using macroinvertebrate communities, and examine short-term (<2 yr) temporal variation of macroinvertebrate communities. Separation of sites based on four condition classifications was not distinct. However, best attainable sites did plot together in an ordination analysis suggesting similarity in macroinvertebrate communities for least disturbed sites. Similarly, for stage of channel evolution, sites characterized by lack of bank failure and sinuous fluvial processes had relatively similar macroinvertebrate communities. Ordination analysis also indicated high temporal variation of macroinvertebrate communities. Reference sites (best attainable and stable sites) had more similar communities between years than unstable and impacted sites. Results of this study: (1) suggest total solids, total phosphorus concentration, percent substrate as sand, ammonia concentration, and conductivity were important variables for structuring stream macroinvertebrate communities in northwest Mississippi, (2) identify potential indicator taxa for assessing such streams based on water quality and physical habitat, (3) provide support for current a priori site classifications at the best attainable (least impacted) category relative to the macroinvertebrate communities, and (4) demonstrate that between-year variation is an important factor when assessing streams of north Mississippi and this variability may be related to the degree of stream degradation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • APHA, 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder & J. B. Stribling, 1999. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, second edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water; Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenhorn, W. V., 1991. Fitness consequences of foraging success in water striders (Gerris remigis; Heteroptera: Gerridae). Behavioral Ecology 2: 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. M. & S. S. Knight, 1986. Status report: Ecological aspects-Demonstration Erosion Control Project in the Yazoo Basin. Proceedings of the Mississippi Chapter of the American Fisheries Society 10: 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. M. & S. S. Knight, 1991. Water quality cycles in two hill land streams subjected to natural, municipal, and non-point agricultural stresses in the Yazoo Basin of Mississippi, USA (1985-1987. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 24: 1654–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. M. & S. Testa, III, 2001. A quick method of determining rock surface area for quantification of the invertebrate community. Hydrobiologia 452: 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. M., S. Testa, III & F. D. Shields, Jr., 1997. Invertebrate response to physical habitat changes resulting from rehabilitation efforts in an incised unstable stream. In Wang, S. Y., E. Langendoen, & F. D. Shields, Jr. (eds), Management of Landscapes Disturbed by Channel Incision, Stabiliazation, Rehabilitation, and Restoration. Center for Computational Hydroscience and Engineering, The University of Mississippi University, MS: 887–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, S. H., 1991. Species diversity measurement: choosing the right index. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 6: 190–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, K. W. & M. J. Klug, 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 10: 147–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeShon, J. E., 1995. Development and application of the invertebrate community index (ICI). In Davis, W. S. & T. P. Simon (eds), Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL: 217–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fore, L. S., J. R. Karr & R. W. Wisseman, 1996. Assessing invertebrate responses to human activities: evaluating alternative approaches. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 212–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., 1980. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, M. E., 1945. The environment, life history and structure of the water boatman, Ramphocorixa acuminata (Uhler) (Hemiptera, Corixidae). The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 30, 365 pp.

  • Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. ter Braak & O. F. R. van Tongeren, 1995. Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 299 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., P. R. Yant, K. D. Fausch & I. J. Schlosser, 1987. Spatial and temporal variability of the index of biotic integrity in three Midwestern streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerans, B. L. & J. R. Karr, 1994. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee valley. Ecological Applications 4: 768–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerans, B. L., J. R. Karr & S. A. Ahlstedt, 1992. Aquatic invertebrate assemblages: spatial and temporal differences among sampling protocols. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 11: 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laasonen, P., T. Muotka & I. Kivijarvi, 1998. Recovery of macroinvertebrate communities from stream habitat restoration. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 8: 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., 1984. Agriculture and stream water quality: a biological evaluation of erosion control practices. Environmental Management 8: 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 12: 279–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., D. L. Penrose & K. W. Eagleson, 1981. Variable effects of sediment addition on stream benthos. Hydrobiologia 79: 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. & M. J. Mefford, 1999. PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, 237 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muotka, T., R. Paavaola, A. Haapala, M. Novikmec & P. Laasonen, 2002. Long-term recovery of stream habitat structure and benthic invertebrate communities from in-stream restoration. Biological Conservation 105: 243–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. W., 1993. Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74: 2215–2230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabo, S. R., 1980. Niche and habitat relations in subalpine bird communities of the White Mountains of New Hampshire. Ecological Monographs 50: 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc, 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th edn, Vol. 2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 1686 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight & C. M. Cooper, 1994. Effects of channel incision on base flow stream habitats and fishes. Environmental Management 18: 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr., A. J. Bowie & C. M. Cooper, 1995a. Control of streambank erosion due to bed degradation with vegetation and structure. Water Resources Bulletin 31: 475–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight & C. M. Cooper, 1995b. Use of the index of biotic integrity to assess physical habitat degradation in warmwater streams. Hydrobiologia 312: 191–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight & C. M. Cooper, 1995c. Rehabilitation of watersheds with incised channels. Water Resources Bulletin 31: 971–982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Jr., F. D., S. S. Knight & C.M. Cooper, 1997. Rehabilitation of warmwater stream ecosystems following channel incision. Ecological Engineering 8: 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, F. D., Jr., S. S. Knight & C. M. Cooper, 1998. Rehabilitation of aquatic habitats in warmwater streams damaged by channel incision in Mississippi. Hydrobiologia 382: 63–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A., 1989. A model of channel response in disturbed alluvial channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 14: 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987. The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. R., A. G. Hildrew & K. Schofield, 1987. Persistence of stream invertebrate communities in relation to environmental variability. Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 597–613.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maul, J., Farris, J., Milam, C. et al. The influence of stream habitat and water quality on macroinvertebrate communities in degraded streams of northwest Mississippi. Hydrobiologia 518, 79–94 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025058.00605.6e

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025058.00605.6e

Navigation