, Volume 511, Issue 1–3, pp 79–89 | Cite as

Suspended Sediment, C, N, P, and Si Yields from the Mississippi River Basin

  • R. Eugene Turner
  • Nancy N. Rabalais


The annual loads of C,N,P, silicate, total suspended sediment (mass) and their yields (mass area−1) were estimated for six watersheds of the Mississippi River Basin (MRB) using water quality and water discharge records for 1973 to 1994. The highest load of suspended sediments is from the Missouri watershed (58 mt km2 yr−1), which is also the largest among the six major sub-basins. The Ohio watershed delivers the largest load of water (38%). The Upper Mississippi has the largest total nitrogen load (32%) and yield (1120 kg TN km2 yr−1). The loading of organic carbon, total phosphorus and silicate from the Upper Mississippi and Ohio watersheds are similar and relatively high (range 2.1–2.5, 0.068–0.076, and 0.8–1.1 mt km2 yr−1, respectively). The yields of suspended sediments, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and silicate from the Lower Mississippi watershed are disproportionately the highest for its area, which is the smallest of all the watersheds and has the weakest monitoring network. The loading from the Red and Arkansas watersheds are of lesser importance than the others for most parameters investigated. The total nitrogen loading to coastal waters increased an additional 150% since the early 1900s, and is now dominated by loads from the Upper Mississippi watershed, rather than the previously dominant Ohio watershed. An analysis of trends for 1973–1994 suggests variability among years, rather than uni-directional change for most variables among 11 key stations. Explanatory relationships were established or confirmed to describe TN and TP loadings in terms of the now largely human-created landscape arising mostly over the last 150 years.

Mississippi River watershed land use nutrients nitrogen phosphorus silicate carbon suspended sediments 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alexander, R. B., A. S. Ludtke, K. K. Fitzgerald & T. L. Schertz, 1996. Data from selected U.S. Geological Survey national stream water-quality monitoring networks (WQN) on CD-ROM. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-337, 79 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, R. B., R. A. Smith & G. E. Schwarz, 2000. Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of Mexico. Nature 403: 758–761.Google Scholar
  3. Arbuckle, K. E. & J. A. Downing, 2001. The influence of watershed land use on lake N:P in a predominantly agricultural landscape. Limnology and Oceanography 46: 970–975.Google Scholar
  4. Caraco, N. F. & J. J. Cole, 1999. Human impact on nitrate export: An analysis using major world rivers. Ambio 28: 167–170.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, F.W., 1924. The composition of the river and lake waters of the United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 135.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, T. A., D.L. Caulder, E. J. Gilroy, L. D. Zynjuk & R. M. Summers 1992. The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: an empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay. Water Resources Research 28: 2352–2363.Google Scholar
  7. Curtis, W. F., J. K. Culbertson & E. B. Chase, 1973. Fluvialsediment discharge to the oceans from the conterminous United States. United States Geological Survey Circular 670.Google Scholar
  8. Dole, R. B. & H. Stabler, 1909. Denudation. Pages 78-93 in Papers on the conservation of water resources. United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 234, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  9. Fisk, H. N., 1952. Geological investigation of the Atchafalaya basin and the problem of Mississippi River diversion. Vol. 1. Vicksburg (MS): United States Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  10. hypox.html#Topic3.Google Scholar
  11. Howarth, R. W., G. Billen, D. Swaney A. Townsend, N. Jaworski, K. Lajtha, J. A. Downing, R. Elmgren, N. Caraco, T. Jordan, F. Berendse, J. Freney, v. Kudeyarov, P. Murdoch & Z. Zhao-Liang, 1996. Regional nitrogen budgets and riverine N & P fluxes for the drainages to the North Atlantic Ocean: Natural and human influences. Biogeochemistry 35: 75–139.Google Scholar
  12. Jones, J. R., B. P. Borofka & R. W. Bachmann, 1976. Factors affecting nutrient loads in some Iowa streams. Water Research 10: 117–122.Google Scholar
  13. Jordan, T. E. & D. E. Weller, 1996. Human contributions to terrestrial nitrogen flux. BioScience 46: 655–664.Google Scholar
  14. Jordan, T. E, D. L. Correll & D. E. Weller, 1997. Relating nutrient discharges from watersheds to land use and streamflow variability. Water Resources Research. 33: 2579–2590.Google Scholar
  15. Judson, S. & D. F. Ritter, 1964. Rates of denudation in the United States. Journal Geophysical Research 69: 3395–3401.Google Scholar
  16. Keown, M. P., E. A. Dardeau Jr. & E. M. Causey, 1986. Historic trends in the sediment flow regime of the Mississippi River. Water Resources Research 22: 1555–1564.Google Scholar
  17. Lurry, D. L. & D. D. Dunn, 1997. Trends in nutrient concentration and load for streams in the Mississippi River Basin, 1974-94. United States Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Rept 97-4223.Google Scholar
  18. Malcolm R. L. & W. H. Durum, 1976. Organic carbon and nitrogen concentrations and annual organic carbon load of six selected rivers of the United States. United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1817-F.Google Scholar
  19. McIssac, G. F., M. B. David, G. Z. Gertner & D. A. Goolsby, 2002. Relating net nitrogen input in the Mississippi River basin to nitrate flux in the lower Mississippi River: A comparison of approaches. Journal of Environmental Quality 31: 1610–1622.Google Scholar
  20. McIssac, G. F., M. B. David, G. Z. Gertner & D. A. Goolsby, 2001. Eutrophication-Nitrate flux in the Mississippi river. Nature 414: 166–167.Google Scholar
  21. Meade, R. H., T. R. Yuzyk, & T. J. Day, 1990. Movement and storage of sediment in rivers of the United States and Canada. In: Wolman, M. G. & H. C. Riggs (eds), Surface Water Hydrology. Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America Volume O-1. Boulder, CO: 255–280.Google Scholar
  22. Milliman, J. D. & R. H. Meade, 1983, World-wide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. Journal Geology 91: 1–21.Google Scholar
  23. Peierls, B., N. Caraco, M. Pace & J. Cole, 1991. Human influence on river nitrogen. Nature 350: 386–387.Google Scholar
  24. Perkins, B. D., K. Lohman, E. Van Nieuwenhuyse & J. R. Jones, 1998. An examination of land cover and stream water quality among physiographic provinces of Missouri, U.S.A. Verh. International Verin. fur Limnologie 26: 940–947.Google Scholar
  25. Rabalais, N. N., R. E. Turner & D. Scavia, 2002. Beyond science into policy: Gulf of Mexico hypoxia and the Mississippi River. BioScience 52: 129–142.Google Scholar
  26. Reynolds, A. R., 1902. Report of Streams Examination. Trustees of the Sanitary District of Chicago, Ill. Blakely Printing Co., Chicago (ILL).Google Scholar
  27. Smart, M. M. J. R. Jones & J. L. Sebaugh, 1985. Streamwatershed relations in the Missouri Ozark Plateau Province. Journal Environmental Quality 14: 77–82.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, R. A., R. B. Alexander & K. J. Lanfear, 1996. Stream water quality in the conterminous United States-Status and trends of selected indicators during the 1980s. USGS Water Supply Paper 2400. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Turner, R. E. & N. N. Rabalais, 1991. Changes in the Mississippi River this century: Implications for coastal food webs. BioScience 41: 140–147.Google Scholar
  30. Turner, R. E., D. Stanley, D. Brock, J. Pennock & N. N. Rabalais, 2000. A comparison of independent N-loading estimates for U.S. estuaries. In: Valigura, R. W., R. B. Alexander, M. S. Castro, T. P. Meyers, H. W. Paerl, P. E. Stacey, & R. E. Turner (eds). Nitrogen Loading in CoastalWater Bodies: An Atmospheric Perspective. Coastal and Estuarine Studies, Vol. No. 57. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.; 107–118.Google Scholar
  31. Turner, R. E. & N. N. Rabalais 2003. Linking landscape and water quality in the Mississippi River Basin. BioScience 53: 563–572.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Eugene Turner
    • 1
  • Nancy N. Rabalais
    • 2
  1. 1.Coastal Ecology InstituteLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A
  2. 2.Louisiana Universities Marine ConsortiumChauvinU.S.A

Personalised recommendations