Advertisement

Health Care Analysis

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 225–240 | Cite as

Voluntary Active Euthanasia and the Doctrine of Double Effect: A View from Germany

  • Martin Klein
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and voluntary active euthanasia (VAE), supplies a short history and argues in favour of permitting both once rigid criteria have been set and the cases retro-reviewed. I suggest that among these criteria should be that VAE should only be permitted with one more necessary criterion: that VAE should only be allowed when physician assisted suicide is not a possible option. If the patient is able to ingest and absorb the medication there is no reason why VAE should be permitted. A brief history of VAE and PAS is given and some of the arguments which have been given are analyzed. The Principle of the Double Effect is briefly discussed and why, in my opinion, it is not a valid principle is briefly discussed

physician-assisted suicide voluntary active euthanasia rights interests intention principle of double effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Angell, M. (1997) The Supreme Court and Physician-Assisted Suicide-The Ultimate Right. New England Journal of Medicine 336(1), 50–53.Google Scholar
  2. Aquinas, T. (1942) Summa Theologica, Art. 64, 2. Part of 2. Part, Vol 3. Ottawa: Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
  3. Bernat, J. L., Goldstein, M. L., and Viste, K. M. (1996) The Neurologist and the Dying Patient. Neurology(46),59–598.Google Scholar
  4. Brock, D. W. (1992) Voluntary Active Euthanasia. Hastings Center Report March-April, 10-22.Google Scholar
  5. Bushnell, M. C. (1997) Commentary. European Journal of pain (1), 167.Google Scholar
  6. Cantor, N. L., and Thomas, G. C. (1996) Pain Relief, Acceleration of Death and Criminal Law. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6(2), 107–127.Google Scholar
  7. de Jong, B. M., Willemsen A. T., and Paans A. M. (1997) Regional cerebral blood flowchanges related to affective speech presentation in persistent vegetative state. Clin Neurol Neurosurg (99), 213–216.Google Scholar
  8. Emanuel, L. (2001) Ethics and Pain Management. An Introductory Overview. Pain and Medicine 2(2), 112–116.Google Scholar
  9. Fergueson, P. R. (1997) Causing Death or Allowing to Die? Developments in the Law. Journal of Medical Ethics 23(6), 368–372.Google Scholar
  10. Harris, J. (2003) Consent and End of Life Decisions. Journal of Medical Ethics 29(1), 10–15.Google Scholar
  11. Hedberg, K., Hopkins, D., and Kohn, M. (2003) Five Years of Legal Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon. New England Journal of Medicine (348), 961–964.Google Scholar
  12. Hoerster, N. (1998) Sterbehilfe im säkularen Staat [Assistance in Dying in the Secular State].Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. This book is in my view one of the most important concerning active euthanasia and many assumptions in my article are derived from it. Unfortunately there does not exist an English translation.Google Scholar
  13. Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature: III. Of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 455–621.Google Scholar
  14. Jansen, L.A., and Sulmasy, D. P. (2002) Sedation, Alimentation, Hydration, and Equivocation: Careful Conversation About Care at the End of Life. Annals of Internal Medicine 136(11), 845–849.Google Scholar
  15. Kassubek, J., Juengling, F. D., Els, T., Spreer, J., Herpers, M., Krause, T., Moser, E., and Lucking, C. H. (2003) Activation of a Residual Cortical Network During Painful Stimulation in Long-Term Postanoxic Vegetative State: A15O-H2OPET Study. Journal of Neurological Science (15), 85–91.Google Scholar
  16. Kennedy, I. (1997) Commentary 3: A Response to Lowe. Journal of Medical Ethics (23), 161–163.Google Scholar
  17. Keown, J. (2002)Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy. An Argument Against Legalization. Cambridge: University Press, pp. 52–57.Google Scholar
  18. Klein, M. (1997)Perception of Pain in the Persistent Vegetative State? European Journal of pain 1:165–168.Google Scholar
  19. Klein, M. (2002) Sterbehilfe und das Problem der Doppelwirkung [Assistance in Dying and the Doctrine of Double Effect]. Wien Klin Wochenschr (114), 415-421. See also a letter to the editor and author's reply in Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 (114), 878-880.Google Scholar
  20. Kuhse, H. (1998) From Intention to Consent. In M.P. Battin, R. Rhodes, and A. Silvers (Eds.), Physician Assisted Suicide. Expanding the Debate (pp. 252–266). New York and London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Leichtentritt, R. D., Rettig, K. D., and Miles, S. H. (1999) Holocaust Survivors on the Euthanasia Debate. Social Science and Medicine (48), 185–196.Google Scholar
  22. Loewy, E. H. (1996) Textbook of Healthcare Ethics. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  23. Loewy, E. H., and Loewy, R. S. (2003) The Ethics of terminal care: orchestrating the end of life. New York, NY; Kluwer Plenum. See in particular the discussion about the problems of autonomy pp. 23-54.Google Scholar
  24. Macklin, R. (2003) Dignity Is a Useless Concept. BMJ 327(7429), 1419–1420.Google Scholar
  25. Marquis, D. B. (1991) Four Versions of Double Effect. Journal of Medical Philosophy 16(5), 515–544.Google Scholar
  26. Menon, D.K., Owen, A.M., Williams, E.J., Minhas, P. S., Allen, C.M.C., Boniface, S.J., Pickard, J. D., and the Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre team. (1998) Cortical Processing in Persistent Vegetative State. Lancet 352(9123), 200.Google Scholar
  27. New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967), New York, Vol 4, pp. 1020-1022.Google Scholar
  28. Preston, T. A. (1998) The Rule of Double Effect. New England Journal of Medicine 338(19), 1389.Google Scholar
  29. Quill, T. E. (2000) Perspectives on Care at the Close of Life. Initiating End of Life Discussions with Seriously Ill Patient: Addressing the Elephant in the Room. JAMA (284), 2502–2507.Google Scholar
  30. Quinn, K. P. (1997) Assisted Suicide and Equal Protection: In Defense of the Distinction Between Killing and Letting Die. Issues in Law and Medicine (13), 145–171.Google Scholar
  31. Rachels, J. (1986) The End of Life. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rousseau, P. (1996) Terminal Sedation in the Care of Dying Patients. Archives of Internal Medicine 156(16), 1785–1786.Google Scholar
  33. Sullivan, A. D., Hedberg, K., and Fleming, D. W. (2000) Legalized Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon-The Second Year. New England Journal of Medicine 342(8), 598–604.Google Scholar
  34. Sulmasy, D. P., and Pellegrino, E. D. (1999) The Rule of Double Effect. Clearing Up the Double Talk. Archives of Internal Medicine 159(6), 545–550.Google Scholar
  35. Thorns, A. (1998) Doctrine of Double Effect Means That Death Is Not Intended. BMJ(316), 391.Google Scholar
  36. Cherny, et al. (1994) Sedation in the Management of Refractory Symptoms. Guidelines for Evaluation and Treatment. J Palliative Care (10), 31–38.Google Scholar
  37. Sulmasy, D. P., et al. (1999) The Rule of Double Effect. Clearing Up the Double Talk. Archives of Internal Medicine (159), 545–550.Google Scholar
  38. Bernat, J.L., et al. (1996) The Neurologist and the Dying Patient. Neurology (46), 598–599.Google Scholar
  39. Kendall, C.E. (2000) A Double Dose of Double Effect. Journal of Medical Ethics (26), 204–205.Google Scholar
  40. Jansens, R.J.P.A., et al. (1999) Hospice and Euthanasia in the Netherlands: An Ethical Point of View. Journal of Medical Ethics (25), 408–412.Google Scholar
  41. Krakauer, E. l., et al. (2000) The Schwartz Center Rounds. Sedation for Intractable Distress of a Dying Patient. Acute palliative Care and the Principle of Double Effect. Oncologist (5), 53–62.Google Scholar
  42. Jansen, L. A., et al. (2002) Sedation, Alimentation, Hydration, and Equivocation: Careful Conversation About Care at the End of Life. Annals of Internal Medicine (36), 845–849.Google Scholar
  43. Truog, R. D., Berde, C.B., Mitchell, C., and Grier, H. E. (1992) Barbiturates in the Care of the Terminally Ill. New England Journal of Medicine 327(23), 1678–1681.Google Scholar
  44. van Delden. (1999) JJM Slippery Slopes in Flat Countries-A Response. Journal of Medical Ethics (25), 22–24.Google Scholar
  45. Vatican City (1980) Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: Declaration on Euthanasia. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Klein
    • 1
  1. 1.NeurologistWuerzburgGermany

Personalised recommendations