Skip to main content
Log in

Democratic Values in a Globalizing World: A Multilevel Analysis of Geographic Contexts

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Geographers contend that regional and national contexts are important mediating and controlling influences on globalization processes. However, to reach this conclusion, geographers have been forced to engage in rather convoluted statistical manipulations to try to isolate the so-called ‘geographic factor’. Recent developments in multilevel statistical modeling offer a more precise and suitable methodology for examination of contextual factors in political behavior if the data have been collected in a hierarchical manner with respondents grouped into lower-level and higher-level districts. The World Values Survey data (collected in three waves from 1980 to 1997) for 65 countries are ideally suited to examination of the hypothesis that democratic beliefs and practices are globalizing. Using three key predictors (trust in fellow citizens, political interest, and volunteerism) for the sample of 91,160 respondents, it is evident that regional (for the 550 regions) and country settings (between 55 and 65 countries) are important predictors of political behavior, on the order of about 10% and 20%, respectively. Respondent characteristics account for about 70% of the variance explained. Ideology is far more significant than many of the usual demographic characteristics in explaining political behavior cross-nationally. Dramatic differences between established and new democracies clarify the political globalization process and global regions (Latin America, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, etc) also emerge as significant factors. Multilevel modeling of survey data offers a compromise between the aggregate data analysis preferred by geographers and the emphasis on surveys in a non-geographic context preferred by political scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson P. and Inglehart R., 1995: Value Change in Global Perspective. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew J.A., 1996: Mapping politics: How context counts in geography. Political Geography 15: 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew J.A., 2001: Reinventing Geopolitics: Geographies of Modern Statehood. Geographisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Hettner Lecture, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L., 1988: Spatial Econometrics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin L., 1998: Spacestat Version 1.90: User's Guide. Ann Arbor, MI: Biomedware, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson L. (ed.), 1999: Transitions to Democracy. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo N., 1999: Myths of moderation: Confrontation and conflict during democratic transitions. In: L. Anderson (ed) Transitions to Democracy. pp. 120–140. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeninger E., 1997: Latin America's multiple challenges. In: Diamond L., Plattner M.E., Chu Y.-H. and Tien H.-M. (eds), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Regional Challenges. pp. 26–63. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen K., 1993: Liberal democracy: Validity and method factors in crossnational measures. American Sociological Review 54: 612–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton M. and van der Walle N, 1997: Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton R.D., 1999: A crisis of confidence in advanced industrial societies? In: P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. pp. 57–77. Oxford University Press, 1999, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond L. and Linz J., 1989: Introduction. In: Diamond L., Linz J. and Lipset S.M. (eds), Democracy in Developing Countries. Vol. 4: Latin America. pp. 1–24. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F., 1995: Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Maxwell-Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein H., 1995 Multilevel Statistical Models. 2nd Edition. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held D., 1993: Democracy: From city-states to cosmospolitan order. In: Held D. (ed.), Prospects for Democracy: North, South, East, West. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 13–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox J.J., 1995: Applied Multilevel Analysis. TT Publicaties, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber E., Rueschemeyer D. and Stephens J., 1999: The paradoxes of contemporary democracy: Formal, participatory and social dimensions. In: Anderson L. (ed.), Transitions to Democracy. pp. 168–192. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S.P., 1975: The democratic distemper. Public Interest 41, 9–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington S.P., 1991: The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R., 1997: Modernization and Post-Modernization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R., 1999: Modernization erodes respect for authority but increases support for democracy. In: P. Norris (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. pp. 236–256. Oxford University Press, 1999, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R. and Carballo M., 1997: Does Latin America exist? (and is there a Confucian culture?): A global analysis of cross-cultural differences. PS: Political Science and Politics 30: 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R., 2000: World Value Surveys and European Values Surveys, 1981-1984, 1990-1993, and 1995-1997. [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI; Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston R.J., 1991: A Question of Place: Exploring the Practice of Human Geography. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K. and Duncan, C., 1991: Specifying and estimating multilevel models for geographical research. Geographical Analysis 16: 148–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones K. and Duncan C., 1996: People and places: the multilevel Model as a general famework for the quantitative analysis of geographical data. In: Longley P. and Batty M. (ed.), Spatial Analysis in a GIS Environment. pp. 79–104. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph R., 1997, Democratization in Africa after 1989: Comparative and theoretical perspectives. Comparative Politics 29: 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G., 1996: Why context should not count. Political Geography 15: 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King G., 1997: A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem: Reconstructing Individual Behavior from Aggregate Data. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby A. and Ward M.D., 1987: The spatial analysis of peace and war. Comparative Political Studies 20: 293–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingenmann H.-D., 1999: Mapping political support in the 1990s: Global trends. In: Norris P. (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. pp. 31–56. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreft I. and de Leeuw J., 1998: Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset S.M., 1959: Some social requisites of democracy, economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53: 69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset S.M., 1994: The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review 59: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset S.M., Seong K.R. and Torres J.C., 1993: A comparative analysis of the social requisites of democracy. Studies in International Comparative Development 16: 155–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacAllister I., 1987: Social context, turnout and the vote: Australian and British comparisons. Political Geography Quarterly 6: 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler W. and Rose R., 2001: What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-Communist societies. Comparative Political Studies 34: 30–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton K., 1999: Social and political trust in established democracies. In: Norris P. (ed.), Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. pp. 169–187. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton K, 2001: Trust, social capital, civil society and democracy. International Political Science Review 22: 201–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye J.S., Zellikov P.D. and King D.C. (eds), 1997: Why People Don't Trust Government. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P., 1999a: Conclusions: The growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In: Norris P. (ed.), Critical Citizens: Support for Democratic Government. pp. 257–272. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P., (ed.), 1999b: Critical Citizens: Support for Democratic Government. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P., 1999c: Introduction: The growth of critical citizens? In: Norris, P. (ed.), Critical Citizens: Support for Democratic Government. pp. 1–30. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J., 1986: Spatial models of international conflict: Extending theories of war behavior. Annals, Association of American Geographers 76: 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J., 2000: Geography as space and geography as place: The divide between political science and political geography continues. Geopolitics 5(3): 126–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J., 2001: Geography and democracy: The spatial diffusion of political and civil rights. In: Dijkink G.-J. and Knippenberg H. (eds), The Territorial Factor: Political Geography in a Globalising World. pp. 77–96. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J., 2003: Spatial and quantitative models in political geography. In: Agnew, J., ÓTuathail G. and Mitchell K. (eds), A Reader in Political Geography, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 32–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J. and Anselin L., 1991: Bringing geography back to the study of international relations: Spatial dependence and regional context in Africa, 1966-78. International Interactions 17: 29–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J. and Bell J.E., 2000: The political geography of civic engagement in Ukraine, 1994-1998. Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 39: 233–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Loughlin J. Ward M.D. et al., 1998: The diffusion of democracy 1946-1994. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88: 545–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattie C. and Johnston R.J., 2000: 'People who talk together vote together': An exploration of contextual effects in Great Britain. Annals, Association of American Geographers 90: 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharr S.J. and Putnam R.D. (eds), 2000: Disaffected Democracies: What's Troubling the Trilateral Countries. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R., 1993: Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R., 2000: Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasbash J., 2000: A User's Guide to MlwiN. Multilevel Models Project, Institute of Education, University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer D., Stephens E.H. and Stephens J.D., 1992: Capitalist Development and Democracy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rustow D.A., 1970: Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. Comparative Politics 2: 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin M., 2001: The politicization of place in Italy. Political Geography 20: 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow S., 1996: Making social science work across space and time: A critical reflection on Robert Putnam's Making Democracy Work. American Political Science Review 90: 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterbury J., 1999: Fortuitous byproducts. In: Anderson L. (ed.), Transitions to Democracy. pp. 261–283. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Loughlin, J. Democratic Values in a Globalizing World: A Multilevel Analysis of Geographic Contexts. GeoJournal 60, 3–17 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000033581.20307.bc

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000033581.20307.bc

Keywords

Navigation