Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 307–321 | Cite as

The rise of regional film production centers in North America, 1984–1997

  • Chris Lukinbeal
Article

Abstract

During the later half of the 1980s through the mid 1990s the American film production industry experienced significant growth due to an increase in the production of television shows. Because of this growth, the economic geography of film production changed dramatically. I examine how the film production market has changed over the period 1984–1997, using a modified version of Storper and Christopherson's (1985) film market model of developed centers, second-order centers, edge-centers and occasional sites. I modify this model by including two new factors in the locational decision process: one, the effects of increased television production on the film market model; and two, the availability of different types of landscapes within regional film production centers.

cultural industry developed centers edge centers flexible specialization second-order centers 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackley L., June 30-July 6, 1997: Island in Limelight: Former Military Bases Provide Soundstage Space. Variety, 61–62.Google Scholar
  2. Aitken S., 1994: I'd rather watch the movie than read the book. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 18: 191–207.Google Scholar
  3. Aitken S. and Zonn L., 1993: Weir(d) Sex: Representation of Gender-Environment Relations in Peter Weir's Picnic at Hanging Rock and Gallipoli. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11: 191–212.Google Scholar
  4. Aitken S. and Zonn L. (eds), 1994: Place, Power, Situation and Spectacle: A Geography of Film. Rowan and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Totowa, NJ.Google Scholar
  5. Bart P., 2001: Interview with Frontline. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/ frontline/shows/hollywood/interviews/ bart.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates J., January 18, 1998: In Local Economy Hollywood Is Star. Los Angeles Times, 1. Sunday Final.Google Scholar
  7. Bell G., 1984: The Golden Gate and the Silver Screen. Rutherford, Madison, Teaneck: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruce S., Assistant Director of the Dallas/Fort Worth Regional Film Commission. November 15, 1998. Personal Interview. P.O. Box 610246 DFW Airport, Dallas TX 75261–0246. 800-234-5699.Google Scholar
  9. Burgess J. and Gold J. (eds), 1985: Geography the Media and Popular Culture. St. Martin's Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  10. California Film Commission, 1997: Feature Films Start Chart. 7080 Hollywood Boulevard, Hollywood, CA 90028.Google Scholar
  11. Chicago Film Office, 1998: New Release: Mayor Daley Announces $104 Million Economic Impact From 1997 Film Production Made in Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Chicago Film Office, City Hall, Room 602, 421 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, 60602. (312) 744–6415.Google Scholar
  13. Christopherson S., 1996: Flexibility and Adaptation in Industrial Relations: The exceptional case of the U.S. media entertainment industries. In: Gray L.S. and Seeber R.L. (eds), Under the Stars: Essays on Labor Relations, pp. 86–113. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  14. Christopherson S. and Storper M., 1989: The Effects of Flexible Specialization on Industrial Politics and the Labor Market: The Motion Picture Industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42(3): 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Christopherson S. and Storper M., 1986: The City as Studio; the World as Back Lot: the Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Motion Picture Industry. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 4: 305–320.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke D (ed.), 1997: The Cinematic City. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Coe N., 2000a: The View from out West: embeddedness, inter-personal relations and the development of an indigenous film industry in Vancouver. Geoforum 31: 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coe N., 2000b: On Location: American Capital and the Local Labour Market in the Vancouver Film Industry. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24(1): 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cosgrove D., 1984: Social Formations and Symbolic Landscapes Barnes and Noble Books, Totawa, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Cosgrove D., 1987: New Directions in Cultural Geography. Area 19(2): 95–101.Google Scholar
  21. Cosgrove D., 1993: Commentary On 'The Reinvention of Cultural Geography' by Price and Lewis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83(3): 515–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Counter D. President, Alliance of Motion Pictures and Television Producers, December 10, 1997: Personal Interview.Google Scholar
  23. Dallas/Fort Worth Film Commission, 1998: 1997 Annual Report. Dallas/ Fort Worth Regional Film Commission. 9445 Freeport Parkway, Suite 640, Irving, TX 75063. 972-621-0400.Google Scholar
  24. Daniels J., 1994: Westerns Hit the Road as On-Location Filming Booms. San Francisco Chronicle January 3, D3.Google Scholar
  25. Daniels S., 1989: Marxism, Culture, and the Duplicity of Landscape. In: Peet R. and Thrift N. (eds), New Models in Geography, pp. 196–220. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  26. Daniels S. and Cosgrove D., 1988: Iconography and Landscape. In: Cosgrove D. and Daniels, S. (eds), The Iconography of Landscape, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Duncan J., 1993: On 'The Reinvention of Cultural Geography' by Price and Lewis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 83, 517–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Duncan J. and Ley D., 1993: Introduction: Representing the Place of Culture. In: Duncan J. and Ley D. (eds), Place/Culture/Representation. pp. 1–21. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Duncan J. and Duncan N., 1988: (Re)reading the landscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 6: 117–126.Google Scholar
  30. Duncan J., 1990: The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. duGay P., 1997: Production of Culture/Cultures of Production. Sage Publications, London.Google Scholar
  32. Florida Film Commission, 1998: Florida is a 'Right to Work State'. Faxed information available at: 1-800-716-7771.Google Scholar
  33. Gasher M., 1995: The Audio-Visual Locations Industry in Canada: Considering British Columbia as Hollywood North. Canadian Journal of Communication 20, 231–254.Google Scholar
  34. Golden J., 1998: Director of the California Group, Motion Picture Association of America. Personal Interview, November 12. Hift F., 1995: Location, Location, Location. Variety 360(7): 72.Google Scholar
  35. Higson A., 1984: Space, Place, Spectacle: Landscape and Townscape in the 'Kitchen Sink' Film. Incorporating Screen Education 25: 2–21.Google Scholar
  36. Higson A., 1987: The Landscape of Television. Landscape Research 12(3): 8–13.Google Scholar
  37. Hollywood Reporter, February 20-22, 1998: 1997 Locations Survey: Stating the Numbers. The Hollywood Reporter Locations Survey Special Issue, 2/20/98, p. S-3.Google Scholar
  38. Jowett G. and Linton J., 1989: Movies as Mass Communication, Second Edition. Sage Publications Inc., Newbury Park, Ca.Google Scholar
  39. Katz Ch., 2000: Manhattan on Film: Walking Tours of Hollywood's Fabled Front Lot. Limelight Editions, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Kennedy Ch. and Lukinbeal Ch., 1997: Towards a Holistic Approach To Geographic Research On Film. Progress in Human Geography 21: 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lukinbeal Ch., 2002: Teaching Historical Geographies of American Film Production. Journal of Geography 101, 250–260.Google Scholar
  42. Lukinbeal Ch., 1998: Reel-to-Real Urban Geographies: The Top Five Cinematic Cities in North America. California Geographer 38, 64–77. (online at: http://typhoon.sdsu.edu/Film/Lukinbeal98.html)Google Scholar
  43. Lukinbeal Ch., 1995: A Geography in Film and Geography of Film. Unpublished Master's Thesis in Geography, California State University, Hayward. (online at: (online at: http://typhoon.sdsu.edu/Film/Geography@SDSU.html)Google Scholar
  44. MacDonald S., 1997: The City as Motion Picture: Notes on Some California City Films. Wide Angle 19(4): 109–130.Google Scholar
  45. Maier R., 1994: Location Scouting and Management Handbook: Television, Film Still Photography. Focal Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  46. McCurdy K., 1998: Personal Interview with the Director of the San Diego Film Commission, 12/10/99.Google Scholar
  47. Meinig D., 1979: Symbolic Landscapes. In: Meinig D.W. (ed.) The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. pp. 164–192. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  48. Monitor Company and the Public Affairs Coalition of the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, 1994: The Economic Impact of Motion Picture, Television and Commercial Production in California.Google Scholar
  49. Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. 15503 Ventura Boulevard, Encino, CA 91436.Google Scholar
  50. Monitor Company and the Public Affairs Coalition of the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, 1994: The Economic Impact of Motion Picture, Television and Commercial Production in California.Google Scholar
  51. Monitor Company and the Screen Actor's Guild, 1999: U.S. Runaway Film and Television Production Study Report. http://www.sag.com/releases.html#DGA/SAGGoogle Scholar
  52. Montreal Film and Television Commission, 1998: 1997 Film and Television Shoots in Montreal. Montreal Film and Television Commission, Department of Economic Development. Marjolaine Lalonde 514: 872–2883.Google Scholar
  53. Mosher L. Librarian, California Film Commission. November 12 1998: Personal Interview. Google Scholar
  54. Moskal R. Director Chicago Film Office, November 1998: Personal Interview. Chicago Film Office, City Hall, Room 602, 421 North LaSalle Street, Chicago, IL, 60602. 312 744–6415.Google Scholar
  55. Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA), 1998: State of the Industry: The Economic Impact of the Entertainment Industry on California. Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. 15503 Ventura Boulevard, Encino, CA 91436.Google Scholar
  56. New York Film Commission, 1998: Production Expenditures in New York City. http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/filmcomm.html North Carolina Film Commission, 1998: 1998 North Carolina Movie Industry Facts. http://www.telefilm-south.com.Google Scholar
  57. North Carolina Film Commission, 1998a: Summary of Fact Sheet. The North Carolina Film Office, 301 N. Wilmington Street, Raleigh, NC 27601. 919-733-9900Google Scholar
  58. Ontario Film Development Corporation, December 19 1997, News Release. 175 Bloor Street East, North Tower, Suite 300, Toronto, Ontario Canada M4W3R8.Google Scholar
  59. State of Florida, Office of the Governor, February 9 1998: Letter to Ivy Brown, The Hollywood Reporter, Special Issues. Monique Cheek, Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic Development, The Capitol Suite 2001, Tallahassee, FL 32399–0001. (850) 922-8742.Google Scholar
  60. Storper M., 1989: The Transition to Flexible Specialization in the US Film Industry: external economies, the division of labour, and the crossing of industrial divides. Cambridge Journal of Economics 13: 273–305.Google Scholar
  61. Storper M., 1993: Flexible Specialization in Hollywood: a Response to Aksoy and Robins. Cambridge Journal of Economics 17: 479–484.Google Scholar
  62. Storper M. and Christopherson S., 1985: The Changing Organization and Location of the Motion Picture Industry. Research Report R854, Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  63. Storper M. and Christopherson S., 1987: Flexible Specialization and Regional Industrial Agglomeration: The Case of the US. Motion Picture Industry. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77(1): 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Texas Association of Film/Tape Professionals, 1998: The Economic Impact of the Film and Tape Industry on the State of Texas. Texas Association of Film/Tape Professionals, 14902 Preston Road #404-518, Dallas, TX, 75240. 888-630-7373.Google Scholar
  65. Vancouver Film Commission, February 6 1998: B.C. Film and Television Industry Posts Record For Production in 1997. 601West Cordova Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 1G1 CANADA. 604-660-4790.Google Scholar
  66. Variety, 1991: U.S. Feature Filming Locations, p. 61.Google Scholar
  67. Witten M., 1994: San Francisco: Looking for a Few Good Projects. Cine-WEB, http://www.cineweb.com.Google Scholar
  68. Zonn L., 1985: Images of Place: A Geography of the Media. Royal Geographical Society of Australia, South Australian Branch 84: 35–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Lukinbeal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyArizona State UniversityTempeU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations