Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 59, Issue 4, pp 297–305 | Cite as

Re-viewing the Entrapment controversy: Megaprojection, (mis)representation and postcolonial performance

  • Tim Bunnell
Article

Abstract

Becoming the tallest building in the world in the mid-1990s, the Petronas Towers was the centre piece of an image of national progress and development that Malaysian authorities sought to project internationally. The release of Fox Movies' Entrapment in Malaysia in May 1999 provoked political outrage and popular disappointment at the way in which the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur had been spliced alongside riverside ‘slums’ filmed in the town of Malacca some 150 km away. This paper provides a critical reading of the spliced scene in the movie. At one level, the angry response of the Malaysian Prime Minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, to the scene diagnoses a geopolitics of asymmetrical representational power. However, I show how Mahathir's criticism of Entrapment in Malaysia was as much a defence of domestic political legitimacy (and national economic investibility) as it was ‘opposition’ or ‘resistance’ to hegemonic ‘Western’ (mis)representation. In addition, while the material and symbolic work of reimaging Kuala Lumpur had sought to negate (neo)orientalist imaginings of ‘Asian’ cities, the controversial scene rendered visible environmental ‘underdevelopment’ that has no place in a modern (vision of) Malaysia. Entrapment thus performed something in inducing Malaysian cities and citizens to ‘clean up’ their act, to practice ‘fully developed’ ways of seeing, being and being seen.

Kuala Lumpur landscape Malaysia megaprojection performance postcolonial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ainon Mohd, 1999: Proposal on guidelines for film-makers. New Straits Times (Malaysia) 25 June, p. 9.Google Scholar
  2. Amir Muhammad, 2002: Identity and our films. In: Willie V. (ed.), —Identiti: Inilah Kami ('Identities: Who we are'), pp. 76–81. National Art Gallery, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold D., 1996: The Problem of Nature: Environment, Culture and European Expansion. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. 373/53460996/p1/article.jhtml <http://www.findarticles.com/m1312/3_373/53460996/p1/article.jhtml>). Accessed 31 August, 2001.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes T., 2002: Performing economic geography. Environment and Planning A 34: 487–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 539000/153929.stm>). Accessed 12 September, 2001.Google Scholar
  7. Bruno G., 1997: Site-seeing: Architecture and the Moving Image. Wide Angle 19: 8–24.Google Scholar
  8. Bunnell T., 1999: Views from above and below: The Petronas Twin Towers and/in contesting visions of development in contemporary Malaysia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 20: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunnell T., 2002a: (Re)positioning Malaysia: High-tech networks and the multicultural rescripting of national identity. Political Geography 21: 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunnell T., 2002b: Kampung rules: landscape and the contested government of urban(e) Malayness. Urban Studies 39: 1686–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bunnell T., 2004: Malaysia, Modernity and the Multimedia Super Corridor: A Critical Geography of Intelligent Landscapes. Routledge Curzon, London and New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bunnell T., Barter P.A. and Morshidi Sirat, 2002: Kuala Lumpur Metropolitan Area: A globalizing city-region. Cities 19: 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Butler J., 1990: Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  14. City Hall Kuala Lumpur, 2003: Draft Structure Plan Kuala Lumpur 2003: A World Class City. City Hall Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  15. CNN.com, 1998: World's tallest building targeted in Malaysian protests (http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/asiapcf/9810/31/malaysia.protest.01/). Accessed 11 September, 2003.Google Scholar
  16. Crampton A. and Power M., 2002: Reel geo-politics: Hollywood, HUAC and UnAmericana, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  17. Fernandez E., 1999: Proud citizen embarrassed by the scene in Entrapment. New Straits Times (Malaysia) 27 May, p. 11.Google Scholar
  18. that_m_built_htm). Accessed 8 September, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. Goh B.L., 2002: Modern Dreams: An Inquiry into Power, Cultural Production and the Cityscape in Contemporary Urban Penang, Malaysia, Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  20. Gold J.R., 1985: From metropolis to the city: Film visions of the future city, 1919-39. In: Burgess J. and Gold J.R. (eds), Geography, The Media and Popular Culture, pp. 123–143. Croom Held, Kent.Google Scholar
  21. Hopkins J., 1994: Mapping of cinematic places: Icons, ideology, and the power of (mis)representation. In: Aitken S.C. and Zonn L.E. (eds), Place, Power, Situation and Spectacle: Geography of Film, pp. 47–65. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham Md.Google Scholar
  22. Jomo K.S., 2001: From currency crisis to recession. In: Jomo K.S. (ed.), Malaysian Eclipse: Economic Crisis and Recovery, pp. 1–47. Zed Books, London and New York.Google Scholar
  23. Kahn J., 1998: Class, culture and Malaysian modernity. In: Schmidt J., Hersh J. and Fold N. (eds), Social Change in Southeast Asia, pp. 81–97. Longman, Harlow.Google Scholar
  24. Khoo B.T., 1995: Paradoxes of Mahathirism: An Intellectual Biography of Mahathir Mohamad. Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  25. King A.D., 1996: Worlds in the city: Manhattan transfer and the ascendance of spectacular space. Planning Perspectives 11: 97–114.Google Scholar
  26. Kurus B., 1998: Malaysia: A year of introspection. In: da Cunha D. and Funston J. (eds), Southeast Asian Affairs 1998, pp. 161–175. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.Google Scholar
  27. Kusno A., 2000: Behind the Postcolonial: Architecture, Urban Space and Political Cultures in Indonesia. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  28. Loh D., 2000: 800 visitors on first open day at Twin Towers. New Straits Times (Malaysia) 31 May, p. 1.Google Scholar
  29. Mahathir Mohamad, 1986: The Challenge. Pelanduk Publications, Petaling Jaya.Google Scholar
  30. Mahathir Mohamad, 1991: Malaysia: the way forward. Paper presented at the inaugural meeting of the Malaysian Business Council, 28 January (http://www.smpke.jpm.my/pm3.htm) Accessed 4 November, 2000.Google Scholar
  31. Mahendran G., 1999: Disgusting behaviour of adults on the Putra-LRT, New Straits Times (Malaysia) 18 June, p. 11.Google Scholar
  32. Manechsha F., 1998: Promoting multimedia industry via film-making. New Straits Times, Computimes (Malaysia) 31 December, p. 10.Google Scholar
  33. Maznah Mohamad, 2000: A tale of two cities: monuments to misplaced pride. Aliran Online (Malaysia) (http://www.malaysia.net/aliran/high9912e.htm). Accessed 14 December, 2000.Google Scholar
  34. McGee T.G., 1967: The Southeast Asian City. G. Bell and Sons, London.Google Scholar
  35. Mee W., 2002: Malaysia's multimedia technopole: A nationalist response to globalisation and postindustrialism. In: Bunnell T., Drummond L.B.W. and Ho K.C. (eds), Critical Reflections on Cities in Southeast Asia, pp. 55–74. Times Academic Press, Singapore.Google Scholar
  36. Morley D. and Robins K., 1992: Techno-Orientalism: futures, foreigners and phobias. New Formations 16: 136–156.Google Scholar
  37. Morshidi S. and Suriati G., 1999: Globalisation of Economic Activity and Third World Cities: A Case Study of Kuala Lumpur. Utusan, Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
  38. Nadzri S., 1999: Hate campaign using varsity students. New Sunday Times (Malaysia), 30 May, p. 2.Google Scholar
  39. New Straits Times (Malaysia), 1999a: Connery thriller opens here today ahead of the US, 29 April, p. 14.Google Scholar
  40. New Straits Times (Malaysia), 1999b: VCDs worth RM100,000 seized, three held, 20 May, p. 12.Google Scholar
  41. Olds K., 1995: Globalization and the production of new urban spaces: Pacific Rim megaprojects in the late 20th Century. Environment and Planning A, 27: 1713–1743.Google Scholar
  42. Ó Tuathail G., 1997: Emerging markets and other simulations: Mexico, the Chiapas revolt and the geofinancial panopticon. Ecumene 4: 300–317.Google Scholar
  43. Pacific Rim Council for Urban Development, 2001: The PRCUD Malacca Report. PRCUD Secretariat, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  44. Parlimen Malaysia, 2001: Maklumat Umum ('Public information'). (http://opsard2.parlimen.gov.my/cyberdocs/cyberdocs.asp?typeid= hansard). Accessed 15 September, 2002.Google Scholar
  45. Pereira B., 2002: US' 'unfair treatment' riles Mahathir, Straits Times (Singapore), 5 October (http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/asia/story/ 0,1870,147125,00.html?). Accessed 5 October, 2002.Google Scholar
  46. Progressive Architecture, 1995: Asia bound, April, pp. 44–88.Google Scholar
  47. Ranawana A., 1999: Bright lights, his city: PM determined to build Putrajaya, whatever the cost, Asiaweek, 2 July, p.Google Scholar
  48. Rose G., 2000: Practising photography: an archive, a study, some photographs and a researcher. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 26: 555–571.Google Scholar
  49. Sabri Zain, 2000: Face Off: A Malaysian Reformasi Diary (1998-99). BigO Books, Singapore.Google Scholar
  50. Said E., 1978: Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. Penguin, London.Google Scholar
  51. Said E., 1993: Culture and Imperialism. Chatto and Windus, London.Google Scholar
  52. Saravanamuttu J., 2003: The eve of the 1999 general election: from the NEP to reformasi. In: Loh F. and Saravanamuttu J. (eds), New Politics in Malaysia, pp. 178–195. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: Singapore.Google Scholar
  53. Sardar Z., 1998: The sport of Mahathir Mohamed. New Statesman, 11 September, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  54. Sardar, Z., 2000: The Consumption of Kuala Lumpur. Chichester, Reaktion.Google Scholar
  55. Sidaway J.D., 2000: Postcolonial geographies: An exploratory essay. Progress in Human Geography 24: 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Silverman K., 1983: The Subject of Semiotics. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Singh S., 1999: Dr M: There is need for policing of press freedom. New Straits Times (Malaysia) 23 June, p. 2.Google Scholar
  58. Steyn, M. 1999: Age concern. Spectator, 3 July, p. 42.Google Scholar
  59. Sunday Mail (Malaysia), 1999: Cinematic power of Towers, 18 April, p. 3.Google Scholar
  60. Talreja, S. (producer), 1998: Edward Said on Orientalism. Media Education Foundation, Northampton MA.Google Scholar
  61. Twentieth Century Fox Corporation, 1999: Entrapment: The Trap is Set (http://www.foxmovies.com/entrapment/). Accessed 12 November, 2002.Google Scholar
  62. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment, 2000: Entrapment: Special Edition DVD. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment Inc, Beverley Hills CA.Google Scholar
  63. Yao S., 2001: Introduction. In: Yao S. (ed.), House of Glass: Culture, Modernity and the State in Southeast Asia, pp. 1–23. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore.Google Scholar
  64. Yeoh B.S.A., 2001: Postcolonial cities. Progress in Human Geography 24: 456–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zonn L.E., 1984: Landscape depiction and perception: A transactional approach. Landscape Journal 3: 144–150.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Bunnell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations