, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 285–292 | Cite as

Where the buffalo roam: Boundaries and the politics of scale in the yellowstone region

  • Jean Lavigne


For more than twenty years, the state of Montana has pursued a controversial policy of lethal control to manage winter migrations of bison from Yellowstone National Park. In the late 1990s, as the state and a number of federal agencies attempted to cooperatively outline a more palatable scenario for bison management, local environmental groups became active participants in the debate. This paper examines the strategies pursued by these organizations in the course of their attempt to construct a new, ecosystem-level territorial space and jurisdictional scale for bison, and places their struggle within the context of existing work in geography on the politics of scale. Ultimately, the failure of their efforts illustrates some of the important constraints faced by social groups that attempt to create new territorial regimes and new scales of resistance in the interstices of existing political structures.

bison environmental politics territory wildlife migration Yellowstone 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anez B., 2000: State, federal officials agree to mediation in dispute over bison plan. Casper Star-Tribune. February 5.Google Scholar
  2. Babbitt B. and Glickman D., 1997: Letter to Governor Racicot of Montana from Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt and Secretary of Agriculture Dan Glickman. February 26. 3 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Cox K.R., 1998: Spaces of dependence, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography 17(1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  4. Delaney D. and Leitner H., 1997: The political construction of scale. Political Geography 16: 93–97.Google Scholar
  5. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1988: Greater Yellowstone Coalition Five-Year Plan, 1988–1992 (unpublished internal document). 19 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1990: Bison to bite the dust once again. Greater Yellowstone Report, Fall 1990: 11.Google Scholar
  7. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1993: A GYC 10th Anniversary Perspective on Greater Yellowstone: Thoughts of former board members. (Special publication distributed to members). 8 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1996a: Bison Capture and Slaughter Begins In Yellowstone Park. Greater Yellowstone Report, Fall 1996: 12.Google Scholar
  9. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1996b: Greater Yellowstone Bison Fact Sheet. (Summary document distributed to reporters, activists, etc.). April 7 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1997a: Bison Slaughter And Hard Winter Take Heavy Toll On Yellowstone's Bison. Greater Yellowstone Report, Spring 1997: 8–9.Google Scholar
  11. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1997b: Bison Stuck with Status Quo. Greater Yellowstone Report, Fall 1997: 7.Google Scholar
  12. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1997c: Yellowstone's Migrations Should Be Source Of Pride — Not Anguish. Greater Yellowstone Report, Spring 1997: 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
  13. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1998a: The Citizens' Plan to Save Yellowstone Buffalo. (Full-color brochure). June 4 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1998b: Focus Groups. (Letter from GYC to MacWilliams Cosgrove Smith Robinson Media Consultants). January 5. 5 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 1998c: The Citizens' Plan to Save Yellowstone Buffalo. (Longer version for internal agency/activist use). July. 8 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 2000a: Isn't There a Better Way? Greater Yellowstone Report, Spring 2000: 4–5.Google Scholar
  17. Greater Yellowstone Coalition, 2000c: Interview with GYC staff member. August 8, 2000.Google Scholar
  18. gye.html (accessed June 18, 2003).Google Scholar
  19. Hull D., 1997: When the Buffalo Roam They May Not Get Home. Washington Post. July 22. A1, A7.Google Scholar
  20. Isenberg A.C., 2000: The Destruction of the Bison: An Environmental History, 1750–1920. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Jonas A., 1994: Editorial: The scale politics of spatiality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 12: 257–264.Google Scholar
  22. Judd D.R., 1998: The case of the missing scales: a commentary on Cox. Political Geography 17(1): 29–34.Google Scholar
  23. Leader-Williams N. and Dublin H.T., 2000: Charismatic megafauna as flagship species. In: Entwistle A. and Dunstone N. (eds), Priorites for the Conservation of Mammalian Diversity: Has the Panda Had its Day? pp. 85–100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Lowe J., 1998: Buffaloed: How Montana played two federal agenciesand asserted deadly control over the Yellowstone bison. Mother JonesInteractive: 11. Scholar
  25. National Park Service, (U.S. Department of the Interior), Forest Service (U.S. Department of Agriculture) and Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (U.S. Department of Agriculture), 2000: Bison Management Plan for the State of Montana and Yellowstone National Park.Google Scholar
  26. Peacock D., 1997: The Yellowstone Massacre. Audubon (May–June): 41–49, 102–110.Google Scholar
  27. Satchell M., 1996: A discouraging word for buffalo. U.S. News & World Report September 30: 61–63.Google Scholar
  28. Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, 1996: Press release announcing SCLDF lawsuit challenging the Interim Bison Management Plan for Yellowstone National Park Bison.Google Scholar
  29. Towers G., 2000: Applying the political geography of scale: grassroots strategies and environmental justice. Professional Geographer 52(1): 23–36.Google Scholar
  30. Wilkinson T., 1997: Yellowstone's Bison War. National Parks (November/December).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Lavigne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyGustavus Adolphus CollegeSt. Peter

Personalised recommendations