Advertisement

GeoJournal

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 253–263 | Cite as

Post-colonial nature conservation in Southern Africa: same emperors, new clothes?

  • Jaidev Singh
  • Henk van Houtum
Article

Abstract

This paper analyses and evaluates the bordering and othering impacts of environmental geopolitical discourse on land conservation in Southern Africa. Through a theoretical in-depth analysis of the use and contents of the term conservation, this paper examines how conservation is determined, instrumentalized and interpreted by the state, international governmental and non-governmental institutions, and specific interest groups including neo-liberal capitalists and local communities especially in the developing world context. In particular, we discuss the impact of current transboundary park-like conservation practices in Southern Africa and how these feed into the continuous attempts to colonise Southern Africa's nature.

“Native Americans were not mistaken when they accused the Whites of having forked tongues. By separating the relations of political power from the relations of scientific reasoning while continuing to shore up power with reason and reason with power, the moderns have always had two irons in the fire. They have become invincible.” (Latour, 1993, p. 38)

“Since most of us live in a hierarchical society, any discourse on wildlife tends to be about social relationships. Whom can we exclude from our Garden of Eden, and how can we keep `others' from trespassing on valuables that help sustain our life and livelihoods, if not our identities.” Marks (1994, p. 120)

“it could be argued that binary divisions are deeply etched into social space and it is a deeper understanding of boundary erection and distancing that is required if we are to provide alternatives to exclusion and conflict” (Sibley, 2001, p. 240).

Keywords

Local Community Social Relationship Interest Group Political Power Paper Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander J., 1993: The State, Agrarian Policy and Rural Politics in Zimbabwe: Case Studies of Insiza and Chimanimani Districts, 1940–1990. DPhil Dissertation, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander J., 2000: Technical Development and the Human Factor: Sciences of Development in Rhodesia's Native Affairs Department. In: S. Dubow (ed.), Science and Society in Southern Africa, pp. 212–237, Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barton G., 2001: Empire Forestry and the Origins of Environmentalism, Journal of Historical Geography 27: 529–552.Google Scholar
  4. Barzetti V. (ed.), 1993: Parks and Progress: Protected Areas and Economic Development in Latin America and the Caribbean. IUCN-World Conservation Union and the Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Baviskar A., 1996: Reverence is Not Enough: Ecological Marxism and Indian Adivasis. In E.M. DuPuis and P. Vandergeest (eds) Creating the Countryside: The Politics of Rural and Environmental Discourse, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  6. Blaikie P., 1995: Changing Environments or Changing Views? A Political Ecology for Developing Countries. Geography 80: 203–214.Google Scholar
  7. Bryant R.L. and Bailey S., 1997: Third World Political Ecology. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  8. Carruthers J. 1989: Creating a National Park, 1910 to 1926. Journal of Southern African Studies 15: 188–216.Google Scholar
  9. Chingono M., 1996: The State, Violence and Development: The Political Economy of War in Mozambique 1975–1992. Avebury, Aldershot, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Cohn B.S., 1996: Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. Comaroff J.V. and Comaroff J.L., 1991: Of Revelation and Revolution: The Christianity, Colonialism and Consciousness in South Africa. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Cooper F. en R. Packard (eds), 1997: International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  13. Dalby S., 1999: Globalization or Global Apartheid? Boundaries and Knowledge in Postmodern Times. In: D. Newman (ed.) Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity, pp. 132–150. Frank Cass, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  14. Demeritt D., 1998: Science, Social Constructism and Nature. In: B. Braun and N. Castree (eds), Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium, pp. 173–193. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  15. Drinkwater M., 1989: Technical Development and Peasant Impoverishment: Land Use Policy in Zimbabwe's Midlands Province. Journal of Southern African Studies 15(2): 287–305.Google Scholar
  16. DuBois M., 1991: The Governance of the Third World: A Foucauldian Perspective on Power Relations in Development, Alternatives 16(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
  17. Duffy R., 1997: The Environmental Challenge to the Nation-State: Superparks and National Parks Policy in Zimbabwe, Journal of Southern African Studies, 23(3): 441–451.Google Scholar
  18. Escobar A., 1988: Power and Visibility: Development and the Invention and Management of the Third World. Cultural Anthropology 3: 428–443.Google Scholar
  19. Escobar A., 1995: Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  20. Ferguson J., 1997: Anthropology and Its Evil Twin: “Development” in the Constitution of a Discipline. In F. Cooper and R. Packard (eds), International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  21. Few R., 2002: Researching Actor Power: Analyzing Mechanisms of Interaction in Negotiations Over Space. Area 34: 29–38.Google Scholar
  22. Finnemore M., 1996: National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
  23. Fisher F., 2000: Citizens, Experts and the Environment. Duke University Press, Durham and London.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault M. (Gordon C. ed.), 1980: Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, Michel Foucault. Pantheon Books, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Foucault M., 1991: Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, pp. 87–104. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Goebel A., 1998: Process, Perception and Power: Notes from “Participatory” Research in a Zimbabwean Resettlement Area. Development and Change 29: 277–305.Google Scholar
  27. Griffin J., Cumming D., Metcalfe S., t'Sas Rolfes M., Singh J., Chonguica E., Rowen M., Oglethorpe J., 1999: Study on the Development of Transboundary Natural Resource Management Areas in Southern Africa: Highlights and Findings. USAID/BSP, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Harries P., 1997: Under alpine eyes: constructing landscape and society in late pre-colonial south-east Africa, Paideuma 43: 171–192.Google Scholar
  29. Houtum H. van and van Naerssen T., 2002: Bordering, ordering and othering, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie (TESG) 93(2): 125–136.Google Scholar
  30. Hughes D., 1999: Frontier Dynamics: Struggles for Land and Clients on the Zimbabwe-Mozambique Border. PhD Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  31. Hughes D., 2002: When Tourists Cross Boundaries and Peasants Don't: Inequality and Regional Metaphors in Southern African Conservation, paper presented at the Globalization of Geographies of Conservation conference, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 19 April 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Hulme D. and Murphree M., 1999: Communities, wildlife and the ‘new conservation’ in Africa, Journal of International Development 11: 277–286.Google Scholar
  33. Hoy D.C., 1986: Power, Repression, Progress: Foucault, Lukes, and the Frankfurt School. In: D.C. Hoy (ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader, pp. 123–137. Blackwell Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Latour B., 1993: We have never been modern. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass.Google Scholar
  35. Lee R.G., 1984: Sustained Yield and Social Order. In: H.K. Steen (ed.), History of Sustained-Yield Forestry: A Symposium: Western Forestry Center, Portland, Oregon, October 18–19, 1983, pp. 90–100. Forest History Society, Inc.: Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
  36. Litfin K., 1994: Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Litfin K., 1997: Sovereignty in World Ecopolitics. Mershon International Studies Review 41: 167–204.Google Scholar
  38. Lliffe J., 1979: A Modern History of Tanganyika. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
  39. Mamdani M., 1996. Citizen and Subject: Decentralized Despotism and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  40. Marks S., 1994: Managerial Ecology and Lineage Husbandry: Environmental Dilemmas in Zambia's Luangwa Valley. In: M. Hufford (ed.), Conserving Culture: A New Discourse on Heritage, pp. 111–121. University of Illinois Press, Urbana and Chicago.Google Scholar
  41. McNeely J.A., 1993: Conservation and Development: How Protected Natural Areas can Contribute to Local Communities. In: A.H. Westing (ed.), Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: A Contribution to Human Security, pp. 48–58. United nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  42. McNeely J.A., 1993: Conservation and Development: How Protected Natural Areas Can Contribute to Local Communities. In Westing, A.H. (ed.). it Transfrontier Reserves for Peace and Nature: A Contribution to Human Security, pp. 48–58. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.Google Scholar
  43. Neumann R., 1998: Imposing Wilderness: Struggles over Livelihood and Nature Preservation in Africa. University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  44. Neumann R., 2000: Land, Justice, and the Politics of Conservation in Tanzania. In: C. Zerner (ed.), People, Plants and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Parajuli P., 1991: Power and Knowledge in Development Discourse. International Social Science Journal 127: 173–190.Google Scholar
  46. Peet R. and Watts M. (eds), 1996: Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  47. Peluso, N., 1992: Rich Forests, Poor People: Forest Access and Control in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  48. Peluso N., 1993: Coercing Conservation? The Politics of State Resource Control. In: R.D. Lipschutz and K. Conca (eds), The State and Social Power in Global Environmental Politics. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Ranger T., 1983: The Invention of Tradition in Colonial Africa. In E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger (eds), The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
  50. Ranger T., 1993: The Invention of Tradition Revisited: The Case of Colonial Africa. In: T. Ranger and O. Vaughan (eds), Legitimacy and the State in the Twentieth-Century Africa. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  51. Ranger T., 1999: Voices from the Rocks: Nature, Culture and History in the Matopos Hills of Zimbabwe. James Currey, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. Redclift M., 1991: Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  53. Scott J.C., 1998: Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.Google Scholar
  54. Sibley D., 1995: Geographies of exclusion, Society and difference in the West. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Singh J., 1999: Study on the Development and Management of Transboundary Conservation Areas in Southern Africa: Global Review. USAID/BSP, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  56. Singh J., 2000: Transboundary Conservation in the African Context: A Threat to Sovereignty? Paper presented at the Border Regions in Transition — IV: Rethinking Boundaries, Geopolitics, Identities and Sustainability, 20–24 February 2000, at Chandigarh, India.Google Scholar
  57. Singh J., 2001: State-making and Community-based Natural Resource Management: Cases of the Vhimba CAMPFIRE Project (Zimbabwe) and the Chimanimani Transfrontier Conservation Area (Mozambique), Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  58. Sletto B., 2002: Boundary Making and Regional Identities in a Globalized Environment: Rebordering the Nariva Swamp, Trinidad. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 20: 183–208.Google Scholar
  59. Stonich S.C., 1999: Commentary on ‘After Nature: Steps to an Antiessentialist Political Ecology’. Current Anthropology 40: 23–24.Google Scholar
  60. Thorsell J., 1990: Through Hot and Cold Wars, Parks Endure. Natural History, 6/90: 59–60.Google Scholar
  61. Vail L., 1989: Introduction: Ethnicity in Southern African History. In L. Vail The Creation of Tribalism in Southern Africa. James Currey, London.Google Scholar
  62. Watts M.J., 2000: Contested Communities, Malignant Markets, and Gilded Governance: Justice, Resource extraction, and Conservation in the Tropics. In: C. Zerner (ed.) People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation, pp. 21–51. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  63. Weed T.J., 1994: Central America's ‘Peace Parks’ and Regional Conflict Resolution, International Environmental Affairs 6: 175–190.Google Scholar
  64. Westing A.H., 1998: Establishment and Management of Transfrontier Reserves for Conflict and Prevention and Confidence-Building. Environmental Conservation 25(2): 91–94.Google Scholar
  65. Wolmer W., 2001: Lowveld Landscapes: Conservation, Development and the Wilderness Vision in South-eastern Zimbabwe, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  66. World Bank, 1996: Mozambique: Transfrontier Conservation Areas Pilot and Institutional Strengthening Project (Report No. 15534-MOZ). World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  67. Zerner C., 2000: Toward a Broader Vision of Justice and Nature Conservation. In: C. Zerner (ed.), People, Plants and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaidev Singh
    • 1
  • Henk van Houtum
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Culture and EcologyPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human GeographyUniversity of NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations