Skip to main content
Log in

A Structural Approach to the Model Generalization of an Urban Street Network*

  • Published:
GeoInformatica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel generalization model for selecting characteristic streets in an urban street network. This model retains the central structure of a street network. It relies on a structural representation of a street network using graph principles where vertices represent named streets and links represent street intersections. Based on this representation, so-called connectivity graph, centrality measures are introduced to qualify the status of each individual vertex within the graph. We show that these measures can be used for characterizing the structural properties of an urban street network, and for the selection of important streets. The proposed approach is validated by a case study applied to a middle-sized Swedish city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AGENT. Constraint Analysis. ESPRIT report, Department of Geography, University of Zurich, 1998.

  2. V. Batagelj and A. Mrvar. Networks/Pajek: Program for Large Networks Analysis, available at http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/pajek/, 1997.

  3. M. Batty, R. Conroy, B. Hillier, B. Jiang, J. Desyllas, C. Mottram, A. Penn, A. Smith, and A. Turner. The Virtual Tate, CASA working paper available at http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/publications/working_papers01.htm, 1998.

  4. F. Buckley and F. Harary. Distance in Graphs. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Reading, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B.P. Buttenfield and R.B. McMaster. Map Generalisation: Making Rules for Knowledge Representation. Longman Scientific & Technical, 1991.

  6. D. Douglas and T. Peucker. “Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digital line or its Caricature,” The Canadian Cartographer, Vol. 10:112-122, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L.C. Freeman. “Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification,” Social Networks, Vol. 1:215-239, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gross and J. Yellen. Graph Theory and its Application. CRC Press: London, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Hillier. Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Hillier and J. Hanson. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Hillier (Ed.). Proceedings, First International Symposium on Space Syntax. University College London: London, 16–18 April, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Holanda (Ed.). Proceedings, Second International Symposium on Space Syntax. Universidade de Brasilia: Brasilia, 29 March–2 April, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Jiang and C. Claramunt. “Integration of space syntax into GIS: New perspectives for urban morphology,” Transactions in GIS, Vol. 6(3):295-309, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Jiang and C. Claramunt. “Topological analysis of urban street networks,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 31:151-162, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.V. Kreveld and J. Peschier. On the Automated Generalization of Road Network Maps, GeoComputation'98, available at http://divcom.otago.ac.nz/SIRC/webpages/Conferences/GeoComp/GeoComp98/geocomp98.htm, 1998.

  16. W.A. Mackaness and M.K. Beard. “Use of graph theory to support map generalisation,” Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, Vol. 20:210-221, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W.A. Mackaness. “Analysis of urban road networks to support cartographic generalization,” Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, Vol. 22:306-316, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W.A. Mackaness and G.A. Mackechnie, “Automating the detection and simplification of junctions in road networks,” GeoInformatica, Vol. 3(2):185-200, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.C. Muller, J.P. Lagrange, and R. Weibel. (Eds.). GIS and Generalization: Methodology and Practice. Taylor and Francis: London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Penn. Intelligent Analysis of Urban Space Patterns: Graphical Interface to Precedent Databases for Urban Design, Auto Carto 11 Proceedings, ACSM-ASPRS, Minneapolis, pp. 53-62.

  21. J. Peponis, J. Wineman, and S. Bafna (Eds.). Proceedings, Third International Symposium on Space Syntax. Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, May 7–11, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  22. D. Richardson. Generalization of Road Networks, available at http://www.ccrs.nrcan.gc.ca/ccrs/tekrd/rd/apps/map/current/genrne.html, 2000.

  23. R.C. Thomson and D.E. Richardson. “A graph theory approach to road network generalisation,” in Proceeding of the 17th International Cartographic Conference, 1871-1880, 1995.

  24. D.J. Watts and S.H. Strogatz. “Collective dynamics of ‘Small-World’ networks,” Nature, Vol. 393:440-442, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Weibel. “Three essential building blocks for automated generalisation,” in J.C. Muller, J.P. Lagrange, and R. Weibel (Eds.), GIS and Generalization: Methodology and Practice, Taylor and Francis: London, 56-69, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, B., Claramunt, C. A Structural Approach to the Model Generalization of an Urban Street Network*. GeoInformatica 8, 157–171 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEIN.0000017746.44824.70

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEIN.0000017746.44824.70

Navigation