Euphytica

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 187–204 | Cite as

Global impact of mutation-derived varieties

  • B.S. Ahloowalia
  • M. Maluszynski
  • K. Nichterlein
Article

Abstract

During the past seventy years, worldwide more than 2250 varieties have been released that have been derived either as direct mutants or from their progenies. Induction of mutations with radiation has been the most frequently used method for directly developed mutant varieties. The prime strategy in mutation-based breeding has been to upgrade the well-adapted plant varieties by altering one or two major traits, which limit their productivity or enhance their quality value. In this paper, the global impact of mutation-derived varieties on food production and quality enhancement is presented. In addition, the economic contribution of the selected mutant varieties of rice, barley, cotton, groundnut, pulses, sunflower, rapeseed and Japanese pear is discussed. In several mutation-derived varieties, the changed traits have resulted in synergistic effect on increasing the yield and quality of the crop, improving agronomic inputs, crop rotation, and consumer acceptance. In contrast to the currently protected plant varieties or germplasm and increasing restrictions on their use, the induced mutants have been freely available for plant breeding. Many mutants have made transnational impact on increasing yield and quality of several seed-propagated crops. Induced mutations will continue to have an increasing role in creating crop varieties with traits such as modified oil, protein and starch quality, enhanced uptake of specific metals, deeper rooting system, and resistance to drought, diseases and salinity as a major component of the environmentally sustainable agriculture. Future research on induced mutations would also be important in the functional genomics of many food crops.

crop improvement economic impact induced mutations mutant value mutant variety 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1999. Oilseeds sector pro-file. Grain and Oilseeds Division, Agriculature and Agri-Food Canada, Ontario. http://atn-riae.agr.ca/public/htmldocs/e1919.htm.Google Scholar
  2. Ahloowalia, B.S. & M. Maluszynski, 2001. Induced mutations-a new paradigm in plant breeding. Euphytica 118: 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amano, E., 2001. Report Special Committee on Evaluation of Economics for Utilization of Radiation. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) 1233 Satanic Takasaki Gunma-ken.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous, 1996. Bureau of Economic and Agricultural Statistics, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous, 2000. Economic scale of utilization of radiation in Japan. Science and Technology Agency, Japan.Google Scholar
  6. Arain, M.A., A. Ahmad & K.A. Sodium, 2000. Utilization of induced mutations for genetic improvement of wheat. In: Mutation Techniques and Molecular Genetics for Tropical and Subtropical Plant Improvement in Asia and the Pacific Region. IAEA-SR-210/6. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 109–111.Google Scholar
  7. Awan, M.A., 1991. Use of induced mutations for crop improvement in Pakistan. In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar
  8. Badawi, A.T., 2001. Yield gap and productiviy decline in rice production in Egypt. In: Yield Gap and Productivity Decline in Rice Production. International Rice Commission, FAO, Rome, pp. 429–441.Google Scholar
  9. Bhatia, C.R., 1991. Economic impact of mutant varieties in India. In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
  10. Bouma, J. & Z. Ohnoutka, 1991. Importance and application of the mutant 'Diamant' in spring barley breeding. In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. 1. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 127–133.Google Scholar
  11. Bozzini, A., L. Rossi, C. Mosconi & G.T. Scarascia-Mugnozza, 1984. The genetic improvement of durum wheat at the Energy Research Center of Casaccia. Informatore-Agrario (Italy) 40: 39–45.Google Scholar
  12. Broertjes, C. & A.M. van Harten, 1988. Applied Mutation Breeding for Vegetatively Propagated Crops. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  13. Canadian Grain Commission, 2000. Quality of 2000 Western Canadian Canola. Canadian Grain Commission, 600-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Canada. http://www.cgc.ca/Quality/grlreports/Canola/2000.Google Scholar
  14. Canola Connection, 2001. The Growers Manual. http://www.canola-council.org/production/canvarys.html.Google Scholar
  15. Chakrabarti, S.N., 1995. Mutation breeding in India with particular reference to PNR rice varieties. J Nuclear Agric Biol 24: 73–82.Google Scholar
  16. Clampett, W.S., R.L. Williams & J.M. Lacy, 2001. Major achievements in closing yield gap of rice between research and farmers in Australia. In: Yield Gap and Productivity Decline in Rice Production. International Rice Comission, FAO, Rome, pp. 411–428.Google Scholar
  17. Caldwell, D., N. McCallum, S. Mudie, P. Hedley, L. Ramsay, H. Liu, D. Marshall & R. Waugh, 2002. A physical/chemical mutation grid for barley functional genomics. In: Scottish Crop Research Institute. Annual Report 2001/2002, Dundee, pp. 157-158.Google Scholar
  18. Dixit, G.P., D.P. Tripathi, S. Chandra, T.N. Tewari & J.L. Tickoo, 2000. MULLaRP Crops: Varieties developed during the last fifty years. All India Coordinated Research Project on MUL-LaRP(ICAR), Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur, India.Google Scholar
  19. Domier, K.W., 1997. Fibre industry in Canada. Euroflax Newsl 2: 8–10.Google Scholar
  20. Downey, R.K., 1990. Brassica oilseed breeding-achievements and opportunities. Plant Breed Abstracts 60: 1165–1170.Google Scholar
  21. Dribnenki, J.C.P., A.G. Green & G.N. Atlin, 1996. Linola TM 989 low linolenic flax. Can J Plant Sci 76: 329–331.Google Scholar
  22. FAO, 2001. FAOSTAT Database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  23. Fick, G.N. & J.F. Miller, 1997. Sunflower breeding. In: A.A. Schneiter (Ed.), Sunflower Technology and Production, pp. 395–439. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
  24. Forster, B.P., 2001. Mutation genetics of salt tolerance in barley: an assessment of Golden Promise and other semi-dwarf mutants. Euphytica 120: 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster, R., D. Egel, E. Maynard, R. Weinzierl, M. Babbadoost, H. Taber, L.W. Jett & B. Hutchinson (Eds.), 2000. Mint (peppermint and spearmint). Midwest Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers, Purdue, pp. 70–72.Google Scholar
  26. Green, A.G., 1986. A mutant genotype of flax (Linum usitatissimum) containing very low levels of linolenic acid in its seed oil. Can J Plant Sci 66: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Green, A.G. & J.C.P. Dribnenki, 1996. Breeding and development of LinolaTM(low linolenic flax). In: FAO-Proc. 3rd Intern. Flax Breeding Research Group, France. FAO, Rome, pp. 145–150.Google Scholar
  28. Hauser, M.T., F. Adhami, M. Dorner, E. Fuchs & J. Glossl, 1998. Generation of co-dominant PCR-based markers by duplex analysis on high resolution gels. Plant J 16: 117–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Health Canada, 1999. High oleic acid/low linolenic acid canola lines 45A37, 46A40. Novel Food Information-Food Biotechnology, FD/OFD-096-228-A. Office of Food Biotechnology, Food Directorate, Health Canada, Tunney's Pasture, Ottawa, Ontario, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  30. Hensz, R.A., 1991. Mutation breeding of grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.). In: Plant Mutation Breeding for Crop Improvement. Vol. I. SM-311, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 533–536.Google Scholar
  31. Huang, B., 1992. Genetic manipulation of microspores and microspore-derived embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 28: 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huitema, J.B.M., W. Preil & J. DeJong, 1991. Methods for selection of low-temperature tolerant mutants of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. using irradiated cell suspension cultures. III. Comparison of mutants selected with or without preselection in vitro at low temperature. Plant Breed 107: 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jan, C.C., 1992. Inheritance and allelism of mitomycin C-and streptomycin-induced recessive genes for male sterility in cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci 32: 317–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jan, C.C. & J.N. Rutger, 1988. Mitomycin C-and streptomycin-induced male sterility in cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci 28: 792–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kale, D.M., Chandra Mouli, G.S.S. Murty & M.V.P. Rao, 1997. Development of a new groundnut variety 'TG-26' by using induced mutants in cross breeding. MBNL 43: 25–27.Google Scholar
  36. Maluszynski, M., B.S. Ahloowalia & B. Sigurbjörnsson, 1995. Application of in vivo and in vitro mutation techniques for crop improvement. Euphytica 85: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maluszynski, M., P. Gustafson, J. Maluszynska & I. Szarejko, 2001. Advanced breeding for germplasm enhancement and yield improvement. In: Yield Gap and Productivity Decline in Rice Production. FAO, Rome, pp. 191–224.Google Scholar
  38. Maluszynski, M., K. Nichterlein, L. van Zanten & B.S. Ahloowalia, 2000. Officially released mutant varieties-the FAO/IAEA Database. Mut Breed Rev 12: 1–84.Google Scholar
  39. Maruyama, K., H. Araki & H. Kato, 1991. Thermosensitive genetic male-sterility induced by irradiation. In: Rice Genetics II. IRRI, Manila, pp. 227–235.Google Scholar
  40. Matousek, J., J. Ptacek, P. Dedic & J. Schubert, 2000. Analysis of variability of P1 gene region of N strain of potato virus Y using temperature-gradient gel elecrtophoresis and DNA heteroduplex analysis. Acta Virol 44: 41–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. McCallum, C.M., L. Comai, E.A. Greene & S. Henikoff, 2000a. Targeted screening for induced mutations. Nature Biotech 18: 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCallum, C.M., L. Comai, E.A. Greene & S. Henikoff, 2000b. Targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) for plant functional genomics. Plant Physiol 123: 439–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, J.F. & G.N. Fick, 1997. The genetics of sunflower. In: A.A. Schneiter (Ed.), Sunflower Technology and Production, pp. 441–495. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.Google Scholar
  44. Muller, H.J., 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science 66: 84–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Murray, M.J. & W.A. Todd, 1972. Registration of Todd's Mitcham peppermint. Crop Sci 12: 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nichterlein, K., 1999. The role of induced mutations in the improvement of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). MBNL 44: 6–9.Google Scholar
  47. Oleykowsky, C.A., C.R. Bronson Mullins, A.K. Godwin & A.T. Yeung, 1998. Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 4597–4602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson, L. & F. Bienvenu, 1998. Peppermint oil. In: K. Hyde (Ed.), The New Rural Industries. A Handbook for Farmers and Investors. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Australia.Google Scholar
  49. Potts, D.A., G.W. Rakow & D.R. Males, 1999. Canola-quality Brassica juncea, a new oilseed crop for the Canadian prairies. In: New Horizons for an old crop. Proc 10th Intl rapeseed Congr, Canberra, Australia 1999. http://www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/4/70.htm.Google Scholar
  50. Qiu, Q., Z. Li, F. Shen, Ch Wang & H. Miao, 1997. Peanut breeding through mutation techniques in China. MBNL 43: 6–7.Google Scholar
  51. Rampton, R., 2000. New sunflowers could change oilseed market. http://www.producer.com/articles/199912.Google Scholar
  52. Ro, P.V. & D.H. At, 2000. Improvement of traditional local varieties through induced mutations using nuclear techniques. In: T.D. Quy, N.H.Dong, L.D. Thanh, N.H.M. Quyen, P.D. Truc & P.V. Ro (Eds.), Seminar on Methodology for Plant Mutation Breeding for Quality: Effective use of physical/chemical Mutagens, pp. 90–94. AGI, VAEC, STA, JAERI, Hanoi.Google Scholar
  53. Röbbelen, G., 1990. Mutation breeding for quality improvement-a case study for oilseed crops. Mut Breed Rev 6: 1–44.Google Scholar
  54. Rutger, J.N., 1992. Impact of mutation breeding in rice-a review. Mut Breed Rev 8: 1–24.Google Scholar
  55. Sauls, J.W., 1999. Texas citrus-Rootstock and scion varieties. http://www.aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/citrus/12304.htm pp. 1-7.Google Scholar
  56. Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.T., F. D'Amato, S. Avanzi, D. Bagnara, M.L. Belli, A. Bozzini, A. Brunori, T. Cervigni, M. Devreux, B. Donini, B. Giorgi, G. Martini, L.M. Monti, E. Moschini, C. Mosconi, G. Porreca & L. Rossi, 1993. Mutation breeding for durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum Desf.) improvement in Italy. Mut Breed Rev 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
  57. Scarth, R. & P.B.E. McVetty, 1999. Designer oil canola-a review of new food-grade Brassica oils with focus on high oleic, low linolenic types. New Horizons for an Old Crop. Proc 10th Intl Rapeseed Congr, Canberra, Australia. http://www.regional.org.au/au/gcirc/4/57.html.Google Scholar
  58. Shen, Y.W., Q.H. Cai & M.W. Gao, 1993. A new thermosensitive radiation-induced male-sterile rice line. RGN 10: 97–98.Google Scholar
  59. Shu, Q., D. Wu & Y. Xia, 1997. The most widely cultivated rice variety 'Zhefu 802' in China and its geneology. MBNL 43: 3–5.Google Scholar
  60. Skoric, D., 1988. Sunflower breeding. Uijarstvo 25: 3–90.Google Scholar
  61. Soldatov, K.I., 1976. Chemical mutagenesis in sunflower breeding. In: Proceedings of the VIIth International Sunflower Conference. Vol. 1. Krasnodar, pp. 352-357.Google Scholar
  62. Spiegel-Roy, P., 1990. Economic and agricultural impact of mutation breeding in fruit trees. Mut Breed Rev 5: 1–26.Google Scholar
  63. Stadler, L.J., 1928. Mutations in barley induced by X-rays and radium. Science 68: 186–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Stokes, T., 2001. Opium-free poppy. Trends in Plant Science 6: 244.Google Scholar
  65. Swanson, E.B., M.P. Coumans, G.L. Brown, J.D. Patel & W.D. Beversdorf, 1988. The characterization of herbicide tolerant plants in Brassica napus L. after in vitro selection of microspores and protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 7: 83–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Temesgen, B., G.R. Brown, D.E. Harry, C.S. Kinlaw, M.M. Sewell & D.B. Neale, 2001. Genetic mapping of expressed sequence tag polymorphism (ESTP) markers in loblloly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Theor Appl Genet 102: 664–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. United Oilseeds, 1997. Ramrod-first Polish-bred pea for UK. Press release, United Oilseeds. Devlzes, Wiltshire, UK.Google Scholar
  68. Wang, L., 1995. Combining radiation mutation techniques with biotechnology for soybean breeding. Research Report, IAEA. Vienna, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  69. Wei, W., P. Bilsborrow, P. Hooley, D. Fincham & B. Forster, 2001. Variation between two near isogenic barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivars in expression of the B subunit of the vacuolar ARPase in response to salinity. Hereditas 135: 227–231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wong, R.S.C. & E. Swanson, 1991. Genetic modification of canola oil: high oleic acid canola. In: C. Haberstroh & C.E. Morris (Eds.), Fat and Cholesterol Reduced Food, pp. 154–164. Gulf, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • B.S. Ahloowalia
    • 1
  • M. Maluszynski
    • 1
  • K. Nichterlein
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and AgricultureInternational Atomic Energy AgencyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations