Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stability and Change: The Structuration of Partnership Histories in Canada, the Netherlands, and the Russian Federation

  • Published:
European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores stability and change in women's partnership histories since the late 1940s in Canada, the Netherlands, and the Russian Federation. Giddens' (1984) theory of structuration is used to understand how the social structure enables or constrains behaviour. Entire partnership histories are examined by applying a Markov and semi-Markov multistate approach to investigate the type, timing, duration, and complexity of partnerships. Results show earlier union formation for younger cohorts in the Russian Federation compared to postponement trends in the other countries. Cohabitation appears to increasingly serve as an alternative to marriage, particularly in Canada. When facilitated by the social structure, divorce levels are high (Russian Federation, Canada). Widowhood in the Russian Federation persists even among younger women. Re-partnering is the highest in the Russian Federation, with post-marital cohabitation gaining ground in Canada. Partnership histories are increasingly complex in the Netherlands and particularly Canada but remain stable in the Russian Federation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ARPL, 2000. Annual Review of Population Law Database. Harvard Law School: UN Population Fund <<http://www.law.harvard.edu/Programs/>>

  • Avdeev, A. and Monnier, A., 1994. 'La nuptialitérusse, une complexitéméconnue', Population 54(4-5): 635–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axinn, W. G. and Thornton, A., 1992. 'The Relationship between cohabitation and divorce: Selectivity or causal influence?', Demography 29: 357–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., 1995. Canadian Family Policies: Cross-National Comparisons. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S., 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. G., Blanc, A. K. and Bloom, D. E., 1988. 'Commitment and the modern union: Assessing the link between premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital stability', American Sociological Review 53: 127–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger, A. and Turcotte, P., 1999. 'L'influence des caractéristiques sociodémographiques sur le début de la vie conjugale des Québécoises', Cahier Québécois de Démographie 28(1-2): 173–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brines, J. and Joyner, K., 1999. 'The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage', American Sociological Review 64: 333–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butz, W. P. and Ward, M. P., 1979. 'The emergence of countercyclical US fertility', American Economic Review 69(3): 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo, J. and Adamson, D., 1997. 'Russia's Demographic 'Crisis' How Real Is It?' RAND Issue Paper. Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies. Labor and Population Program.

  • Easterlin, R., 1976. 'The conflict between aspirations and resources', Population and Development Review 2(3): 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J. and Johnson, E. L., 1995. 'A sociological view of the never married', International Journal of Sociology of the Family 25(2): 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. H., 1996. The State and the Family. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goskomstat of Russia, 1994. The Demographic Yearbook of the Russian Federation, 1993. Goskomstat of Russia, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., 1984. 'Multistate demography and event history analysis', in A. Diekmann and P. Mitter (eds), Stochastic Modelling of Social Processes. London,: Academic Press, Inc. 39–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiner, R. A., 1983. 'The origin of predictable behaviour', The American Economic Review 73: 560–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoem, J. M. 1972. 'Inhomogeneous semi-Markov processes, select actuarial tables, and duration dependence in demography', in T. N. Greville (ed), Longitudinal Analysis of Labour Market Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, I., 1994. Being Pregnant in Rural South India. Thela Thesis, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imbrogno, S. and Imbrogno, N. I., 1989. 'Soviet women and the autonomous family', International Journal of Sociology of the Family 19: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J. P. G. et al., 1998. 'The instability of marriages and cohabiting relationships in the Netherlands' [in Dutch] Mens en Maatschappij 73(1): 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonker, J. M. L., 1990. Under the Spell of the Family: Some Considerations over the Meaning of Primary Networks as a Safety Net [in Dutch]. Catholic University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latten, J. and De Graaf, A., 1997. Fertility and Family Surveys in countries of the ECE region. Standard Country Report. The Netherlands. UN/ECE, Economic Studies No. 10c. United Nations, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bourdais, C. and Marcil-Gratton, N., 1996. 'Family transformations across the Canadian/ American border: When the laggard becomes the leader', Journal of Comparative Family Studies 27(3): 415–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R., 1995. 'The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation', in K. O. Mason and A.-M. Jensen (eds), Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries. New York: Oxford University Press 17–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R., 1998. 'On theory development: Applications to the study of family formation', Population and Development Review 24(1): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. and Meekers, D., 1986. 'Value changes and the dimensions of familism in the European community', European Journal of Population 2: 225–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. and Moors, G., 2000. 'Recent Trends in Fertility and Household Formation in the Industrialized World', IPD-Working Paper, no 2000:2. Belgium: Vrije Universiteit Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L. A., Brien, M. J. and Waite, L. J., 1995. 'Premarital cohabitation and subsequent marital dissolution: A matter of self-selection?' Demography 32(3): 437–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manting, D., 1994. Dynamics in Marriage and Cohabitation. Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manting, D., 1996. 'The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage', European Sociological Review 12: 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., 2000. 'Providing space for time: The impact of temporality on life course research', Time & Society 9(1): 91-127

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice, The Netherlands, 1997. Registered Partnerships [in Dutch] Information Department, Internal and External Communication Section, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosko., W., 1983. 'Divorce in the USSR', Journal of Marriage and the Family 45(2): 419–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, K. and Suchindran, C. M., 1987. Life Table Techniques and Their Applications. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namboodiri, K. 1991. Demographic Analysis. A Stochastic Approach. San Diego, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, J., Orlo., A. S. and Shaver, S., 1999. States, Markets, Families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V. K., 1988. 'A theory of marriage timing', American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortman, A.-R. and Kalmijn, M., 2002. 'Women's labour market position and divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating economic interpretations of the work effect', European Journal of Population 18(2): 175–2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, S. H., 1986. 'Changing values and falling birth rates', Population and Development Review 12: 176–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, C., 1995. Cohabiting, Married or Single. Avebury, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajulton, F., 1992. Life History Analysis: Guidelines for Using the Program LIFEHIST. Discussion Paper 92-5, Canada: University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R. and Vandenheuvel, A., 1990. 'Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single?' Population and Development Review 16(4): 703–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, K. et al. 2003. 'Economic conditions and the family and housing transitions of young adults in Russia and the Ukraine', Journal of Youth Studies 6(1): 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., 1975. Introduction to Multiregional Mathematical Demography. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherbov, S. and Van Vianen, H., 2001. 'Marriage and fertility of Russian women born between 1900 and 1960: A cohort analysis', European Journal of Population 17: 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, R., 1988. Modelling Multigroup Populations. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada, 1997. Public Use Microdata File Documentation and User's Guide, 1995 General Social Survey. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulemon, L., 1997. 'Cohabitation is here to stay', Population 9: 11–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, J., 1980. 'The concept of the one-parent family', Journal of Comparative Family Studies 11(1): 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turcotte, P. and Goldscheider, F., 1998. 'Evolution of factors influencing first union formation in Canada', Canadian Studies in Population 25(2): 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, 1997. Demographic Yearbook, 1970-1995. United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uunk, W., 1999. 'Remarriage in the Netherlands. Sociodemographic determinants of married and unmarried cohabitation after divorce' [in Dutch] Mens en Maatschappij, 74(2): 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villeneuve-Gokalp, C., 1990. 'Du mariage aux unions sans papiers: Histoire récente des transformation conjugales', Population, 49(2): 265–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishnevsky, A. G., 1996. 'Family, fertility and demographic dynamics in Russia: Analysis and forecast', in J. DaVanzo (ed), Russia's Demographic 'Crisis'. Rand Conference Proceedings, Santa Monica, CA, 1–35.

  • Volkov, E., 1999. Methodology and Organization of the 1994 Microcensus in Russia. PRC Working Paper 99-5, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Frank, A. A., 1979. Family Policy in the USSR since 1944. R&E Research Assoc, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. J., 1987. 'The marital status life table', in J. Bongaarts, T. K. Burch and K. W. Wachter (eds), Family Demography: Methods and Their Applications. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 125–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, F. J., 1991. 'Life table analysis of staging processes', in H. A. Becker (ed), Life Histories and Generations. ISOR, Volume II. University of Utrecht, The Netherlands, 477–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., 2000. Cohabitation: An Alternative Form of Family Living. Toronto: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social-Cultural Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit (Free University) Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Melinda Mills

Authors
  1. Melinda Mills
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, M. Stability and Change: The Structuration of Partnership Histories in Canada, the Netherlands, and the Russian Federation. European Journal of Population 20, 141–175 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUJP.0000033862.83081.ad

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUJP.0000033862.83081.ad

Search

Navigation