Abstract
This study investigated the use of slurry cutoff walls in conjunction with monitoring wells to detect contaminant releases from a solid waste landfill. The 50 m wide by 75 m long landfill was oriented oblique to regional groundwater flow in a shallow sand aquifer. Computer models calculated flow fields and the detection capability of six monitoring networks, four including a 1 m wide by 50 m long cutoff wall at various positions along the landfill's downgradient boundaries and upgradient of the landfill. Wells were positioned to take advantage of convergent flow induced downgradient of the cutoff walls. A five-well network with no cutoff wall detected 81% of contaminant plumes originating within the landfill's footprint before they reached a buffer zone boundary located 50 m from the landfill's downgradient corner. By comparison, detection efficiencies of networks augmented with cutoff walls ranged from 81 to 100%. The most efficient network detected 100% of contaminant releases with four wells, with a centrally located, downgradient cutoff wall. In general, cutoff walls increased detection efficiency by delaying transport of contaminant plumes to the buffer zone boundary, thereby allowing them to increase in size, and by inducing convergent flow at downgradient areas, thereby funneling contaminantplumes toward monitoring wells. However, increases in detection efficiency were too small to offset construction costs for cutoff walls. A 100% detection efficiency was also attained by an eight-well network with no cutoff wall, at approximately one-thirdthe cost of the most efficient wall-augmented network.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
API (American Petroleum Institute): 1989, Hydrogeologic Database for Groundwater Modeling, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC.
Domenico, P. A. and Palciauskas, V. V.: 1982, 'Alternative boundaries in solid waste management', Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 20(3), 303-311.
U.S. EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency): 1994, RCRA Ground Water Monitoring, Government Institutes, Rockville, MD.
Fetter, C. W.: 1994, Applied Hydrogeology, Macmillan, New York, NY.
Freeze, R. A. and Cherry, J. A.: 1979, Groundwater, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
FRTR (Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable): 2001, Remediation Technologies Screening Matrix and Reference Guide 3.0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Gelhar, L. W., Welty, C. and Rehfeldt, K. R.: 1992, 'A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers', Water Resour. Res. 28(7), 1955-1974.
Hudak, P. F.: 1998, 'Configuring detection wells near landfills', Ground Water Monit. Remediat. 18(2), 93-96.
McDonald, M. G. and Harbaugh, A. W.: 1988, A Modular Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.
NFESC (Navy Facilities Engineering Services Center): 2002, Environmental Services, U.S. Navy, Washington, DC.
Wilson, C. R., Einberger, C. M., Jackson, R. L. and Mercer, R. B.: 1992, 'Design of ground-water monitoring networks using the Monitoring Efficiency Model (MEMO)', Ground Water 30(6), 965-970.
Zheng, C.: 1990, MT3D-A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical Reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems, S. S. Papadopulos and Associates, Rockville, MD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hudak, P.F. Augmenting Groundwater Monitoring Networks near Landfills with Slurry Cutoff Walls. Environ Monit Assess 90, 113–120 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000003570.92643.7d
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000003570.92643.7d