De Economist

, Volume 152, Issue 3, pp 427–437 | Cite as

Free Trade and its Enemies



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhagwhati, J. (2002), Globalization and Governance, WIDER Annual Lecture 4.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R.E., J. Francois and R.E. Portes (1997), ‘Costs and Benefits of EU Enlargement to the East,’ Economic Policy, April.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. (2000), Something To Declare, London, Picador.Google Scholar
  4. Bollen, J., H.L.F. de Groot, T. Manders, P.J.G. Tang, H.R.J. Vollenbergh and C.A. Withagen (2004), Klimaatbeleid en Europese concurrentieposities, CPB Document 24Google Scholar
  5. Davis, D.R. (1998), ‘The Home Market, Trade and Industrial Structure,’ American Economic Review, 88, pp. 1264–1277.Google Scholar
  6. Dollar, D. and A. Kraay (2002), ‘Spreading the Wealth,’ Foreign Affairs, 1, pp. 120–133.Google Scholar
  7. Feenstra, R. and G. Hanson (1996), ‘Foreign Investment, Outsourcing and Relative Wages’, in: R. Feenstra, G. Grossman and D. Irwin (eds.), Political Economy of Trade Policy: Essays in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harrison, G.W., D. Tarr and T. Rutherford (1997), ‘Quantifying the Uruguay Round,’ Economic Journal, 107, pp. 1405–1430.Google Scholar
  9. Gorter, J. and R. de Mooij (2001), Capital Income Taxation in Europe: Trends and Trade Offs, Sdu Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Groot, H.L.F. de, G. Linders, P. Rietveld and U. Subramanian (2003), The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns, mimeo.Google Scholar
  11. Gros, D. (1987), ‘A Note on the Optimal Tariff, Retaliation and the Welfare Loss from Tariff Wars, in a Framework with Intra-Industry Trade,’ Journal of International Economics, 23, pp. 357–367.Google Scholar
  12. Heston, A., R. Summers and B. Aten (2002), Penn World Table Version 6.1, Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP)Google Scholar
  13. Hummel, D. (1999), Toward a Geography of Trade Costs, mimeo.Google Scholar
  14. ILO, the World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization (2004), A Fair Globalization; Creating Opportunities For All, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. Krugman, P.R. (1997), ‘What Should Trade Negotiators Talk About?,’ Journal of Economic Literature, 25, pp. 113–120.Google Scholar
  16. Lejour, A., R. de Mooij and R. Nahuis (2001), EU Enlargement: Implications for Countries and Industries, CPB Document 11Google Scholar
  17. McCallum, J. (1995), ‘National Borders Matter: Canada-US Regional Trade Patterns,’ American Economic Review, 85(3), pp. 615–623.Google Scholar
  18. Prasch, R. (1996), ‘Reassessing the Theory of Comparative Advantage,’ Review of Political Economy, 8(1), pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
  19. Rodríguez, F. and D. Rodrik (1999), ‘Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence,’ NBER Working Paper, 7081.Google Scholar
  20. Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian and F. Trebbi (2002), Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development, NBER working paper 9305.Google Scholar
  21. Rose, A.K. (2003), ‘Which International Institution Promote International Trade?,’ CEPR Working Paper, 3764.Google Scholar
  22. Srinivasan, T.N. and J.S. Wallack (2004), ‘Globalization, Growth and the Poor,’ De Economist, 152(2), pp. 251–272.Google Scholar
  23. Stiglitz, J.E. (2002), Globalization and its discontents, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
  24. Venables, T. (1987), ‘Trade and Trade Policy with Differentiated Products: A Chamberlinian-Ricardian Model,’ Economic Journal, 97, pp. 700–717.Google Scholar
  25. Winters, L.A. (2000), Trade, Trade Policy and Poverty: What Are The Links?, CEPR Discussion Paper, 2382.Google Scholar
  26. Winters, L.A. (2004), ‘Trade Liberalisation and Economic Performance: An Overview,’ Economic Journal, 114, p. 493.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Personalised recommendations