Conservation Genetics

, Volume 4, Issue 6, pp 759–778 | Cite as

Genetic variation and island biogreography: Microsatellite and mitochondrial DNA variation in island populations of the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes greyii

  • G. Hinten
  • F. Harriss
  • M. Rossetto
  • P.R. Braverstock


To understand the impact of various factors on the maintenance of genetic variation in natural populations, we need to focus on situations where at least some of these factors are removed or controlled. In this study, we used highly variable, presumably neutral, microsatellite and mtDNA markers to assess the nature of genetic variation in 14 island and two mainland populations of the Australian bush rat, where there is no migration between islands. Thus we are controlling for selection and gene flow. Both marker sets revealed low levels of diversity within the small island populations and extreme differentiation between populations. For six microsatellite loci, all of the small island populations had less genetic variation than the mainland populations; reduction in allelic diversity was more pronounced than loss of heterozygosity. Kangaroo Island, the large island population, had similar levels of diversity to the mainland populations. A 442 base pair (bp) section of the mtDNA control region was screened for variation by outgroup heteroduplex analysis/temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (OHA/TGGE). Only three of the 13 small island populations showed haplotypic diversity: Gambier (2), Waldegrave (2), and Eyere (3). The level of haplotypic diversity in the small island populations was similar to that on the mainland, most likely reflecting a recent population bottleneck on the mainland. In contrast, Kangaroo Island had 9 mtDNA haplotypes. The dominant factor influencing genetic diversity on the islands was island size. No correlation was detected between genetic diversity and the time since isolation or distance form the mainland. The combination of genetic drift within and complete isolation among the small island populations has resulted in rapid and extreme population divergence. Population pair-wise comparisons of allele frequency distributions showed significant differences for all populations for all loci (Fst = 0.11–0.84, Rst = 0.07–0.99). For the mtDNA control region, 92.6% of variation was apportioned between populations; only the Pearson islands shared a haplotype. Mantel tests of pair-wise genetic distance with pair-wise geographic distance showed no significant geographical clustering of haplotypes. However, population substructuring was detected within populations where sampling was conducted over a broader geographical range, as indicated by departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Thus substructuring in the ancestral population cannot be ruled out. The dominant evolutionary forces on the islands, after the initial founder event, are stochastic population processes such as genetic drift and mutation.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF (1983) Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals.Google Scholar
  2. Baverstock PF, Adams M (1987) Comparative rates of molecular, chromosomal and morphological evolution in some Australian vertebrates. In: Rates of Evolution (eds. Campbell K, Day M). Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  3. Belperio AP, Hails JR, Gostin VA (1983) A review of Holocene sea levels in South Australia. In: Australian Sea Levels in the Last 15000 Years: A Review (ed. Hopley D), pp. 37–47. Monograph Series Occasional Paper, Vol. 86, pp. 958-962. James Cook University of North Queensland.Google Scholar
  4. Bolger DT, Alberts AC, Sauvajot RM, Botenza P, Mccalvin C, Tran D, Mazzoni S, Soule ME (1997) Response of rodents to habitat fragmentation in coastal southern California. Ecological Applications, 7(2), 552–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bothwell A, Yancopoulos GC, Alt FW (1990) Methods for Cloning and Analysis of Eukaryotic Genomes. Jones and Bartlett, Boston.Google Scholar
  6. Brownstein MJ, Carpten JD, Smith JR (1996) Modulation of nontemplated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: Primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. BioTechniques, 20(6), 1004–1010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell NJH, Harriss FC, Elphinstone MS, Baverstock PR (1995) Outgroup heteroduplex analysis using temperature gel electrophoresis — high resolution, large scale screening of DNA variation in the mitochondrial control region. Molecular Ecology, 4(4), 407–418.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheylan G, Granjon L, Britton-Davidian J (1998) Distribution of genetic diversity within and between Western Mediterranean populations of the black rat, Rattus rattus (L 1758). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 63, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1997) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics, 144, 2001–2014.Google Scholar
  10. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochrondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics, 131, 479–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Farris (1970) Methods for computing Wagner trees. Systematic Zoology, 19, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 30(4), 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitch W(1971) Towards defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology, 20, 406–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frankham R (1998) Inbreeding and extinction-Island populations. Conservation Biology, 12(3), 665–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frankham R (1997) Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity, 78(3), 311–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology, 10(6), 1500–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frankham R (1995) Conservation genetics. Annual Review of Genetics, 29, 305–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garza JC, Slatkin M, Freimer NB (1995) Microsatellite allele frequencies in humans and chimpanzees, with implications for constraints on allele size. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12(4), 594–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein DB, Linares AR, Cavallisforza LL, Feldman MW (1995) AN evaluation of genetic distances for use with microsatellite loci. Genetics, 139(1), 463–471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinten G, Maguire T, Rossetto M, Baverstock P (1999) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the bush rat, Rattus fuscipes greyii. Molecular Ecology, 8(8), 1351–1352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Houlden BA, Costello BH, Sharkey D, Fowler EV, Melzer A, Ellis W, Carrick F, Baverstock PR, Elphinstone MS (1999) Phylogeographic differentiation in the mitochrondrial control region in the Koala, Phascolarctus cinereus (Goldfuss 1817). Molecular Ecology, 8, 999–1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Magnuson VL, Ally DS, Nylund SJ, Karanjawala ZE, Rayman JB, Knapp JI, Lowe AL, Gosh S, Collins FS (1996) Substrate nucleotide-determined non-template addition of adenine by taq DNA polymerase: Implications for PCR based genotyping and cloning. BioTechniques, 21, 700–709.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mills LS, Allendorf FW(1996) The one migrant per generation rule in conservation and management. Conservation Biology, 10(6), 1509–1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moro D, Campbell NJH, Elphistone MS, Baverstock PR (1998) The Thevenard Island mouse: Historic and conservation implications from mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. Pacific Conservation Biology, 4, 282–288.Google Scholar
  25. Nuata MJ, Weissing FJ (1996) Constraints on allele size at mcrosatellite loci-implications for genetic differentiation. Genetics, 143(2), 1021–1032.Google Scholar
  26. Newmark WD (1996) Insularisation of Tanzanian national parks and the local extinction of large mammals. Conservation Biology, 10(6), 1549–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (Version 12): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248–249.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson T, Canty P, Mooney T, Rudduck P (1996) South Australia's Offshore Islands. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4, 406–425.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitt L (1975) Genetic evidence for the existence of two separate populations of rattus fuscipes greyii on Pearson island South Australia. Transcripts of the Royal Society of South Australia, 99(1), 35–38.Google Scholar
  31. Schmitt L (1978) Genetic variation in islolated populations of the Australian bush rat, Rattus fuscipes greyii. Evolution, 32, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis, Ver 2.000. Genetic and Biometry Lab, Dept. of anthropology, University of Geneva. Seddon JM, Baverstock PR (1999) Variation on islands: Major histocompatibility complex (Mhc) polymorphism in populations of the Australian bush rat. Molecular Ecology, 8(12), 2071–2079.Google Scholar
  33. Seddon JM, Baverstock PR (2000) Evolutionary lineages of RT1.Ba in the Australian Rattus. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 17, 768–772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Slatkin M (1995) A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics, 139, 457–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Swofford DL (1996) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods), version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  36. Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochrondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10, 512–526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Taylor JM, Horner BE (1973) Reproductive characteristics of wild native Australian Rattus (Rodentia: Muridae). Australian Journal of Zoology, 21, 437–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wakeley J (1993) Substitution rate variation among sites in hypervariable region 1 of human mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 37, 613–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1994) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Hinten
    • 1
  • F. Harriss
    • 1
  • M. Rossetto
    • 2
  • P.R. Braverstock
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Animal Conservation GeneticsSouthern Cross UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Centre for Plant Conservation GeneticsSouthern Cross University; Royal Botanical GardensSydney

Personalised recommendations