Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction: Considerations on the Logical Structure of Evolutionary Theories

  • Published:
Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evolutionary theories are characterised by another logic than the classical scientific theories as, e.g., in physics or chemistry. Since Darwin evolutionary processes are captured by algorithmic theories, i.e., theories whose logical core consists of certain fundamental algorithms. In the case of biological evolution this is a “genetic algorithm”, that is the processes of variation and selection. Other evolutionary processes like those of societies and cognitive development have to be understood by other algorithms that are characteristic for the specific domains. These considerations are illustrated with the case studies of Darwin, Marx and Piaget.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amundson, R. (1994), “Two Concepts of Constraints: Adaptationism and the Challenge from Developmental Biology,” Philosophy of Science, 61(4), 556–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chandler, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and T. Luckmann (1966), The Social Construction of Reality. Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. and P.J. Richardson (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. and M.W. Feldman (1981), Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1986), The Blind Watchmaker. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.C. (1995), Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Touchstone, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew, D.J. and B.H. Weber (1995), Darwinism Evolving. Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. (1994), How the Leopard Changed its Spots. Charles Scriber's Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1977), Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S.J. (1982), “Darwinism and the Expansion of Evolutionary Theory,” Science, 216, 380–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer, J. and K. Sigmund (1984), Evolutionstheorie und dynamische Systeme. Paul Parey, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, D.R. (1985), Gödel. Escher. Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J.S. (1942), Evolution, the Modern Synthesis. Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., M. Lachmann and M.J. Lamb (1992), “Evidence, Mechanisms and Models for the Inheritance of Required Characters,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 158, 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, L. (2000), Biolinguistics. Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993), The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (2000), Investigations. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, J. and C. Stoica (2001), “Social Constraints and Cybernetic Explanations,” InterJournal “New England Complex Systems Institute” http://www.interjournal.org/ Nr. 453.

  • Klüver, J. The Dynamics and Evolution of Social Systems. New Foundations of a Mathematical Sociology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

  • Klüver, J. (2002), An Essay Concerning Sociocultural Evolution. Theoretical Principles and Mathematical Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koza, J.R. (1992), Genetic Programming. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing. J.S. (2002), “Artificial Societies and the Social Sciences,” Artificial Life, 8, 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (2000), It ain't Necessarily so: The Dream of the Human Genome Project and Other Illusions. New York Review of Books.

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalewicz, Z. (1994), Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989), The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994), The Language Instinct. Morrow, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B.G. (1998), Sociocultural Evolution. New Perspectives on the Past. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfram, S. (2002), A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign (Ill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuensche, A. and M. Lesser (1992), The Global Dynamics of Cellular Automata. Attractions Fields of One-Dimensional Cellular Automata. Addison Wesley, Reading (MA).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klüver, J. Introduction: Considerations on the Logical Structure of Evolutionary Theories. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 9, 183–194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000026581.28302.7a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CMOT.0000026581.28302.7a

Navigation