Skip to main content
Log in

Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To aid climate policy decisions, accurate quantitative descriptions of the uncertainty in climate outcomes under various possible policies are needed. Here, we apply an earth systems model to describe the uncertainty in climate projections under two different policy scenarios. This study illustrates an internally consistent uncertainty analysis of one climate assessment modeling framework, propagating uncertainties in both economic and climate components, and constraining climate parameter uncertainties based on observation. We find that in the absence of greenhouse gas emissions restrictions, there is a one in forty chance that global mean surface temperature change will exceed 4.9 °C by the year 2100. A policy case with aggressive emissions reductions over time lowers the temperature change to a one in forty chance of exceeding 3.2 °C, thus reducing but not eliminating the chance of substantial warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, M. R., Stott, P. A., Mitchell, J. F. B., Schnur, R., and Delworth, T. L.: 2000, ‘Quantifying the Uncertainty in Forecasts of Anthropogenic Climate Change’, Nature 407 (6804), 617–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M. R. and Tett, S. F. B.: 1999, ‘Checking for Model Consistency in Optimal Fingerprinting’, Clim. Dyn. 15, 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M. et al.: 2001, The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Revi-sions, Sensitivities, and Comparison of Results, Report No. 71, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Or see http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/MITJPSPGC_Rpt71.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiker, M., Reilly, J., and Ellerman, D.: 2000, ‘Japanese Nuclear Power and the Kyoto Agreement’, J. Japan. Int. Econ. 14, 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, T.: 1763, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. 53, 370–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugnion, V.: 2000, ‘Reducing the Uncertainty in the Contributions of Greenland to Sea–Level Rise in the 20th and 21st Centuries’, Ann. Glaciol. 31, 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, J. A. and Gregory, J. M. et al.: 2001, “Changes in Sea Level”, in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (Chapter 11), Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen, M. et al.: 2002, ‘Earth System Models of Intermediate Complexity: Closing the Gap in the Spectrum of Climate System Models’, Clim. Dyn. 18, 579–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubasch, U. and Meehl, G. A. et al.: 2001, ‘Projections of Future Climate Change’, in Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P. J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., and Johnson, C. A. (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (Chapter 9), Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, C. E., Stone, P. H., Sokolov, A. P., Allen, M. R., and Webster, M. D.: 2002, ‘Quantifying Uncertainties in Climate System Properties with the Use of Recent Climate Observations’, Science 295, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, C. E., Allen, M. R., Sokolov, A. P., and Stone, P. H.: 2001, ‘Constraining Climate Model Properties Using Optimal Fingerprint Detection Methods’, Clim. Dyn. 18, 227–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, C. E., Allen, M. R., Stone, P. H., and Sokolov, A. P.: 2000, ‘Constraining Uncertainties in Climate Models Using Climate Change Detection Techniques’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 24(4), 569–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genest, C. and Zidek, J. V.: 1986, ‘Combining Probability Distributions: A Critique and Annotated Bibliography’, Statist. Sci. 1, 114–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. M. and Oerlemans J.: 1998, ‘Simulated Future Sea–Level Rise Due to Glacier Malt Based on Regionally and Seasonally Resolved Temperature Changes’, Nature 391, 474–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammit, J. K., Lempert, R. J. and Schlesinger, M. E.: 1992, ‘A Sequential–Decision Strategy for Abating Climate Change’, Nature 357, 315–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holian, G., Sokolov, A. P., and Prinn, R. G.: 2001, Uncertainty in Atmospheric CO 2 Predictions from a Parametric Uncertainty Analysis of a Global Ocean Carbon Cycle Model, Report No. 80, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2001. Or see http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/MITJPSPGC_Rpt80.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.): 1996, Climate Change 1995–The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iman, R. L. and Helton, J. C.: 1998, ‘An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models’, Risk Anal. 8(1), 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iman, R. L. and Conover, W. J.: 1982, ‘A Distribution–Free Approach to Inducing Rank Correlation Among Input Variables’, Communications Statist. B11(3), 311–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, H. D., Schmalensee, R., and Reiner, D. M.:1996, ‘What Does Stabilizing Greenhouse Gas Concentrations Mean?’ in Flannery, B., Kolhase, K., and LeVine, D. (eds.), Critical Issues in the Economics of Climate Change, International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, D. W.: 1996, ‘When is it Appropriate to Combine Expert Judgements?’, Clim. Change 33, 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutti, R. et al.: 2002, ‘Constraints on Radiative Forcing and Future Climate Change from Observations and Climate Model Ensembles’, Nature 416, 719–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y.: 1996, Modeling the Emissions of Nitrous Oxide and Methane from the Terrestrial Biosphere to the Atmosphere, Report No. 10, Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Or see http://web.mit.edu/globalchange/www/rpt10a.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A. S. and Richels, R. G.: 1995, ‘The Greenhouse Debate: Economic Efficiency, Burden Sharing and Hedging Strategies’, Energy J. 16(4), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M., Wang, C., Webster, M., and Prinn, R. G.: 2002, ‘Linking Local Air Pollution to Global Chemistry and Climate’, J. Geophys. Res. 105(D18), 22869–22896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melillo, J. M. et al.: 1993, Nature 363, 234–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G. and Henrion, M.: 1990, Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G. and Keith, D. W.: 1995, ‘Subjective Judgments by Climate Experts’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, R. H. and Schneider, S. H.: 2000, in Pachauri, R., Taniguchi, T., and Tanaka, K. (eds.), Guidance Papers on the Cross Cutting Issues of the Third Assessment Report, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, pp. 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N. et al.: 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N., Victor, D., and Morita, T.: 1998, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 3(2–4), 95–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D.: 1994, Managing the Global Commons, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivier, J. G. J. et al.: 1995, Description of EDGAR Version 2.0: A Set of Global Emission Inventories of Greenhouse Gases and Ozone Depleting Substances for All Anthropogenic and Most Natural Sources on a Per Country Basis and on 1° × 1° Grid, Report no. 771060002, RIVM, Bilthoven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paté–Cornell, E.: 1996, ‘Uncertainties in Global Climate Change Estimates’, Clim. Change 33, 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinn, R., Jacoby, H., Sokolov, A., Wang, C., Xiao, X., Yang, Z., Eckaus, R., Stone, P., Ellerman, D., Melillo, J., Fitzmaurice, J., Kicklighter, D., Holian, G., and Liu, Y.: 1999, ‘Integrated Global System Model for Climate Policy Assessment: Feedbacks and Sensitivity Studies’, Clim. Change 41(3/4), 469–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J. et al.: 2001, ‘Multi–Gas Assessment of the Kyoto Protocol’, Nature 401, 549–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. H.: 2001, ‘What is “Dangerous” Climate Change?’, Nature 411, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.H.: 2002, ‘Can We Estimate the Likelihood of Climatic Changes at 2100?’, Clim. Change 52, 441–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A. P., Forest, C. E., and Stone, P. H.: 2003, ‘Comparing Oceanic Heat Uptake in AOGCM Transient Climate Change Experiments’, J. Climate 16(10), 1573–1582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A. and Stone, P.: 1998, ‘A Flexible Climate Model for Use in Integrated Assessments’, Clim. Dyn. 14, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott, P. A. and Kettleborough, J. A.: 2002, ‘Origins and Estimates of Uncertainty in Predictions of Twenty–First Century Temperature Rise’, Nature 416, 723–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatang, M., Pan, W., Prinn, R., and McRae, G.: 1997, ‘An Efficient Method for Parametric Uncertainty Analysis of Numerical Geophysical Models’, J. Geophys. Res. 102(D18), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian, H., Melillo, J. M., Kicklighter, D. W., McGuire, A. D., and Helfrich, J. V. K. III: 1999, Tellus 51B, 414–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, J. G. and Narayan, V. K.: 1996, ‘The Risk of Sea Level Rise’, Clim. Change 33, 151–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1974, ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 185, 1124–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 1997, FCCC/CP/1997/L.7/Add.1. Bonn.

  • Van Aardenne, J. A., Dentener, F. J., Olivier, J. G. J., Klein Goldewijk, C. G. M., and Lelieveld, J.: 2001, ‘A 1° × 1° Resolution Data Set of Historical Anthropogenic Trace Gas Emissions for the Period 1890–1990’, Global Biogeochem. Cycles 15(4), 909–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. and Prinn, R. G.: 1999, ‘Impact of Emissions, Chemistry and Climate on Atmospheric Carbon Monoxide: 100–Year Predictions from a Global Chemistry–Climate Model’, Chemosphere–Global Change Science 1(1–3), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Prinn, R. G., and Sokolov, A. P.: 1998, ‘A Global Interactive Chemistry and Climate Model: Formulation and Testing’, J. Geophys. Res. 103(D3), 3399–3417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D., Babiker, M., Mayer, M., Reilly, J. M., Harnisch, J., Sarofim, M. C., and Wang, C.: 2002, ‘Uncertainty in Emissions Projections for Climate Models’, Atmos. Environ. 36(22), 3659–3670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D.: 2002, ‘The Curious Role of “Learning” in Climate Policy: ShouldWeWait for More Data?’, Energy J. 23(2), 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. D. and Sokolov, A. P.: 2000, ‘A Methodology for Quantifying Uncertainty in Climate Projections’, Clim. Change 46(4), 417–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper, S. C. B.: 2001, ‘Interpretations of High Projections for Global–Mean Warming’, Science 293, 451–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, X. et al.: 1997, ‘Linking a Global Terrestrial Biogeochemical Model and a 2–Dimensional Climate Model: Implications for the Global Carbon Budget’, Tellus 49B, 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webster, M., Forest, C., Reilly, J. et al. Uncertainty Analysis of Climate Change and Policy Response. Climatic Change 61, 295–320 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004564.09961.9f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000004564.09961.9f

Keywords

Navigation