Biodiversity & Conservation

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 395–407 | Cite as

The effects of a wind farm on birds in a migration point: the Strait of Gibraltar

  • Manuela de LucasEmail author
  • Guyonne F.E. Janss
  • Miguel Ferrer


The interaction between birds and wind turbines is an important factor to consider when a wind farm is constructed. A wind farm and two control areas were studied in Tarifa (Andalusia Province, southern Spain, 30STF590000–30STE610950). Variables were studied along linear transects in each area and observations of flight were also recorded from fixed points in the wind farm. The main purpose of our research was to determine the impact and the degree of flight behavioural change in birds flights resulting from a wind farm. Soaring birds can detect the presence of the turbines because they change their flight direction when they fly near the turbines and their abundance did not seem to be affected. This is also supported by the low amount of dead birds we found in the whole study period in the wind farm area. More studies will be necessary after and before the construction of wind farms to assess changes in passerine populations. Windfarms do not appear to be more detrimental to birds than other man-made structures.

Flight behaviour Impact on birds of human structures Spain Turbine Wind farm 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alonso J.A. and Alonso J.C. 1999. Mitigation of bird collisions with transmission lines through groundwire marking. In: Ferrer M. and Janss G.F.E. (eds), Birds and Power Lines: Collision, Electrocution and Breeding. Quercus, Madrid, Spain, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
  2. Barrios L. 1995. Energía eólica y aves en el Campo de Gibraltar. La Garcilla 93: 39–41.Google Scholar
  3. Batschelet E. 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology. Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bernis F. 1980. La migración de las aves en el Estrecho de Gibraltar. Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  5. Bildstein K. and Zalles J.L. (eds) 2000. Raptor Watch: A Global Directory of Raptor Migration Sites. Birdlife Conservation, London.Google Scholar
  6. Blanco J.C. and González J.L. (eds) 1992. Libro Rojo de los Vertebrados de España. Ministerio Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  7. Cramp S. and Simmons K.E.L. (eds) 1980. The Birds of theWestern Palearctic Vol. II. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  8. Dirksen S., Winden J.V.D. and Spaans A.L. 1998. Nocturnal collision risks of birds with wind turbines in tidal and semi-offshore areas. In: Ratto C.F. and Solari G. (eds), Wind Energy and Landscape. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 99–107.Google Scholar
  9. Eberhardt L.L. 1978. Transect Methods for Populations Studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 1–31.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson W.P., Johnson G.D., Strickland M.D., Young D.P., Sernka K.J. and Good R.E. 2001. Avian Collisions with Wind Turbines: A Summary of Existing Studies and Comparisons to Other Sources of Avian Collision Mortality in the United States. Resource Document, National Wind Coordinating Committee (NWCC), Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Fajardo I., Pividal V., Trigo M. and Jimenez M. 1998. Habitat selection, activity peaks and strategies to avoid road mortality by the little owl Athene noctua. A new methodology on owls research. Alauda 66: 49–60.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrer M., Riva M.D.L. and Castroviejo J. 1991. Electrocution of raptors on power lines in southwestern Spain. Journal of Field Ornithology 62: 181–190.Google Scholar
  13. Finlayson C. 1992. Birds of the Strait of Gibraltar. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  14. Fleishman E., Blair R.B. and Murphy D.D. 2001. Empirical validation of a method for umbrella species selection. Ecological Applications 11: 1489–1501.Google Scholar
  15. Harmata A.R., Montopoli G.J., Oakleaf B., Harmata P.J. and Restani M. 1999. Movements and survival of Bald Eagles banded in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 781–793.Google Scholar
  16. Higgins K.F., Osborn R.G., Dieter C.D. and Usgaard R.E. 1996. Monitoring of Seasonal Bird Activity and Mortality at the Buffalo Ridge Wind Resource Area, Minnesota, 1994-1995. South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, National Biological Service, Brookings, South Dakota.Google Scholar
  17. Hunt G. 1999. A Population Study of Golden Eagles in the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Santa Cruz, California.Google Scholar
  18. Janss G.F.E. 1999. Avian electrocution on power poles: European experiences. In: Ferrer M. and Janss G.F.E. (eds), Birds and Power Lines: Collision, Electrocution and Breeding. Quercus, Madrid, Spain, pp. 155–174.Google Scholar
  19. Janss G.F.E. and Ferrer M. 1998. Rate of bird collision with power lines: effects of conductor-marking and static wire-marking. Journal of Field Ornithology 69: 8–17.Google Scholar
  20. Klem D. 1990a. Collisions between birds and windows: mortality and prevention. Journal of Field Ornithology 61: 120–128.Google Scholar
  21. Klem D. 1990b. Bird injuries, cause of death, and recuperation from collision with windows. Journal of Field Ornithology 61: 115–119.Google Scholar
  22. Larsen J.K. and Madsen J. 2000. Effects of wind turbines and other physical elements on field utilization by pink-footed geese (Anser brachyrhynchus): a landscape perspective. Landscape Ecology 15: 755–764.Google Scholar
  23. Leddy K.L., Higgins K.F. and Naugle D.E. 1999. Effects of wind turbine on upland nesting birds in conservation reserve program grasslands. Wilson Bulletin 111: 100–104.Google Scholar
  24. Morrison M.L. and Sinclair K. 1998. Avian Risk and Fatality Protocol. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, Colorado.Google Scholar
  25. Musters C.J.M., Noordervliet M.A.W. and Terkeus W.J. 1996. Bird casualties caused by a wind energy project in an estuary. Bird Study 43: 124–126.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson H.K. and Curry R.C. 1995. Assessing Avian Interactions with Windplant Development and Operation. Translations 60th North American Wildlife and Nature Resource Conferences,. pp. 266–277.Google Scholar
  27. Orloff S. and Flannery A. 1992. Wind Turbine Effects on Avian Activity, Habitat Use, and Mortality in Altamont Pass and Solano County Wind Resource Areas. California Energy Commission (CEC), Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  28. Orloff S.G. and Flannery A.W. 1993. Wind turbine effects on avian activity, habitat use, and mortality in the Altamont Pass and Solano County Wind Resource Areas. In: Huckabee J.W. (ed.), Avian Interactions with Utility Structures. Avian Power Line Interactions Committee (APLIC). Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  29. Osborn R.G., Dieter C.D., Higgins K.F. and Usgaard R.E. 1998. Bird flight characteristics near wind turbines in Minnesota. The American Midland Naturalist 139: 28–38.Google Scholar
  30. Osborn R.G., Higgins K.F., Usgaard R.E., Dieter C.D. and Neiger R.D. 2000. Bird mortality associated with wind turbines at the Buffalo Ridge Wind Resource Area, Minnesota. The American Midland Naturalist 143: 41–52.Google Scholar
  31. Penteriani V. 1998. Birds and Wind Power Lines. W.W.F., Tuscany Region.Google Scholar
  32. Penteriani V., Balbont?n J. and Ferrer M. 2003. Simultaneous effects of age and territory quality on fecundity in Bonelli's eagle Hieraaetus fasciatus. Ibis 145: E77–E82.Google Scholar
  33. Smith J.C. 1985. Perching and roosting patterns of raptors on power transmission towers in Southeast Idaho and Southwest Wyoming. Raptor Research 19: 135–138.Google Scholar
  34. Stahlecker D.L. 1979. Raptor use of nest boxes and platforms on transmission towers. Wildlife Society Bulletin 7: 59–62.Google Scholar
  35. Suter W., Graf R.F. and Hess R. 2002. Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and avian biodiversity: testing the umbrella-species concept. Conservation Biology 16: 778–788.Google Scholar
  36. Villafuerte R.J., Vinuela J. and Blanco J.C. 1998. Extensive predator persecution caused by population crash in a game species: the case of red kites and rabbits in Spain. Biological Conservation 84: 181–188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuela de Lucas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guyonne F.E. Janss
    • 1
  • Miguel Ferrer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied BiologyEstación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC)SevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations