Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 175–185 | Cite as

Identification of species of the genus Candida by analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers

  • Rosa de Llanos Frutos
  • M. Teresa Fernández-Espinar
  • Amparo Querol


The PCR amplification and subsequent restriction analysis of the ribosomal region spanning the internal transcribed spacers (ITS1 and ITS2) and the 5.8S rRNA gene is applied to the identification of yeasts belonging to the genus Candida. This methodology has previously been used for the identification of some species of this genus, but in the present work this application has been applied to the identification and characterisation of a greater number of species of the genus Candida, with a special survey of species of clinical and biotechnological interest. Among the species of the genus Candida, the high variability observed, both in the length of the amplified region (ranging between 390 and 900 bp) and in their restriction patterns, allows the unequivocal identification to the species level, with the exception of the group of species that comprises C. membranifaciens, C. conglobata, C. atlantica, C. atmosphaerica, and C. oleophila, that required the sequencing of the D1/D2 domain of the 26S rRNA gene or the 5.8S–ITS region for their proper differentiation. The 5.8S–ITS restriction analysis also failed in the differentiation of species within the pairs C.aaseri/C.butyri,C.fructus/C.musae,C.santamariae var. santamariae/C. beechii and C. zeylanoides/C. krissii. In this case, the high sequence similarities obtained for their 26S D1/D2 domain and the 5.8S–ITS region indicate that each pair of species should be considered as a single species. The main purpose of this work is to generate a database for a high number of yeast species, of both biotechnological and clinical interest, and to facilitate their easy, fast, and reliable identification. The present work improves the database available online at the IATA web page ( with the patterns of 75 species belonging to the genus Candida.

Candida Molecular identification 5.8S–ITS region 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arias C.R., Burns J.K., Friedrich L.M., Goodrich R.M. and Parish M.E. 2002. Yeast species associated with orange juice: evaluation of different identification methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 1955-1961.Google Scholar
  2. Belloch C., Barrio E., García M.D. and Querol A. 1998a. Inter-and intraspecific chromosome pattern variation in the yeast genus Kluyveromyces. Yeast 14: 1341-1354.Google Scholar
  3. Belloch C., Barrio E., García M.D. and Querol A. 1998b. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the yeast genus Kluyveromyces: restriction map analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal spacers. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 21: 266-273.Google Scholar
  4. Belloch C., Querol A., García M.D. and Barrio E. 2000. Phylogeny of the genus Kluyveromyces inferred from the mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase II gene. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50: 405-416.Google Scholar
  5. Belloch C., Fernández-Espinar M.T., Querol A., García M.D. and Barrio E. 2002. An analysis of inter-and intraspecific genetic variabilities in the Kluyveromyces marxianus group of yeast species for the reconsideration of the K. lactis taxon. Yeast 19: 257-268.Google Scholar
  6. Cadez N., Raspor P., de Cock A.W.A.M., Boekhout T. and Smith M.Th. 2002. Molecular identification and genetic diversity within species of the genera Hanseniaspora and Kloeckera. FEMS Yeast Res. 1: 279-289.Google Scholar
  7. Chen Y.C., Eisner J.D., Kattar M.M., Rassoulian-Barret S.L., LaFe K., Yarfitz S.L., Limaye A.P. and Cookson B.T. 2000. Identification of medically important yeasts using PCR-based detection of DNA sequence polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer 2 region of the rRNA genes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38: 2302-2310.Google Scholar
  8. Daniel H.-M., Sorrell T.C. and Meyer W. 2001. Partial sequence analysis of the actin and its potential for studying the phylogeny of Candida species and their teleomorfs. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51: 1593-1606.Google Scholar
  9. Deak T. and Beuchat L.R. 1996. Handbook of Food Spoilage Yeast. CRC, Boca Raton, New York, London, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  10. Dlauchy D., Tornai-Lehoczki J. and Peter G. 1999. Restriction enzyme analysis of PCR amplified rDNA as taxonomic tool in yeast identification. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22: 445-453.Google Scholar
  11. Esteve-Zarzoso B., Peris-Torán M.J., Ramón D. and Querol A. 2001. Molecular characterisation of Hanseniaspora Species. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 80: 85-92.Google Scholar
  12. Esteve-Zarzoso B., Belloch C., Uruburu F. and Querol A. 1999. Identification of yeasts by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S rRNA gene and the two ribosomal internal transcribed spacers. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49: 329-337.Google Scholar
  13. Fernández-Espinar M.T., Esteve-Zarzoso B., Querol A. and Barrio E. 2000. RFLP analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and the 5.8S rRNA gene region of the genus Saccharomyces: a fast method for species identification and differentiation of flor yeasts. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 78: 87-97.Google Scholar
  14. Guillamón J.M., Sabaté J., Barrio E., Cano J. and Querol A. 1998. Rapid identification of wine yeast species based on RFLP analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Arch. Microbiol. 169: 387-392.Google Scholar
  15. Hurley R., de Louvois J. and Mulhall A. 1986. Yeast as Human and Animal Pathogens. In: Rose A.H. and Harrison J.S. (eds), The Yeasts. Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York, pp. 207-281.Google Scholar
  16. James S.A., Cai J.P., Roberts I.N. and Collins M.D. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Saccharomyces based on 18S rRNA gene sequences: description of Saccharomyces kunashirensis sp. nov. and Saccharomyces martiniae sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 47: 453-460.Google Scholar
  17. Kurtzman C.P. and Robnett C.J. 1997. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5' end of the large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35: 1216-1223.Google Scholar
  18. Kurtzman C.P. and Robnett C.J. 1998. Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 3: 331-371.Google Scholar
  19. Kurtzman C.P. and Robnett C.J. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res. 3: 417-432.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer S.A., Payne R.W. and Yarrow D. 1998. Candida Berkhout. In: Kurtman C. and Fell J.W. (eds), The Yeast. A Taxonomic Study. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 454-574.Google Scholar
  21. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee E. and Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis M.A., Gelfand D.H., Sninsky J.J. and White T.J. (eds), PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 315-322.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa de Llanos Frutos
    • 1
  • M. Teresa Fernández-Espinar
    • 1
  • Amparo Querol
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Biotecnología, Instituto de Agroquímica y Tecnología de los Alimentos, CSICBurjassot, ValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations