Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 61, Issue 1–3, pp 123–134 | Cite as

Forest gardens as an ‘intermediate’ land-use system in the nature–culture continuum: Characteristics and future potential

  • K.F. Wiersum
Article

Abstract

Forest gardens are reconstructed natural forests, in which wild and cultivated plants coexist, such that the structural characteristics and ecological processes of natural forests are preserved, although the species composition has been adapted to suit human needs. These agroforests include a range of modified and transformed forests, and form an integral part of local land-use systems. They lie between natural forests and tree-crop plantations in terms of their structure and composition, and low intensity of forest extraction systems and the high intensity plantation systems in terms of their management intensity. Their management is characterized by combined use of silvicultural and horticultural operations, and spatial and temporal variations. These ecologically sustainable systems are often dynamic in species composition in response to changing socioeconomic conditions. Evolved over a long period of time as a result of local community's creativity, forest gardens have still received little attention in agroforestry research, just as in the case of the more intensively domesticated homegardens. The study of forest gardens offers good opportunities for obtaining a better understanding of the ‘nature-analogous’ agroforestry systems and for developing multifunctional agroforestry systems combining production and biodiversity values.

Agroforests Ecological sustainability Forest management Landscape dynamics Social sustainability Synergy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson A.B. 1990. Extraction and forest management by rural inhabitants in the Amazon estuary. pp. 65–85. In: Anderson A.B. (ed.), Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Towards Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson L.S. and Sinclair F.L. 1993. Ecological interaction in agroforestry systems. Agroforest Abstracts 6: 57–91.Google Scholar
  3. Angelsen A., Asbjørnsen H., Belcher B., Michon G. and Ruiz-Pereze M. 2000. Cultivating (in) Tropical Forests? The evolution and sustainability of intermediate systems between extractivism and plantations. International Workshop Cultivating (in) Tropical Forests. Kraemmervika, Lofoten, Norway, June 28–July 1, 2000 (Proceedings in press).Google Scholar
  4. Arnold J.E.M. 2001. Forests and People: 25 years of Community Forestry. FAO, Rome, Italy. 134 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Arnold J.E.M. and Dewees P.A. 1995. Tree Management in Farmer Strategies. Responses to Agricultural Intensification. Oxford University Press, London, 292 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Arnold J.E.M. and Ruiz Perez M. 2001. Can non-timber forest products match tropical conservation and development objectives? Ecological Economics 39: 437–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aumeeruddy Y. and Sansonnens B. 1994. Shifting from the simple to complex agroforestry systems: an example for buffer zone management from Kerinci (Sumatra, Indonesia). Agroforest Syst 28: 113–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belsky J.M. 1993. Household food security, farm trees, and agroforestry: a comparative study in Indonesia and the Philippines. Hum Organ 52: 130–141.Google Scholar
  9. Berkes F., Colding J. and Folke C. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 19: 1251–1262.Google Scholar
  10. Boerboom J.H.A. and Wiersum K.F. 1983. Human impact on tropical moist forest. pp. 83–106. In: Holzner W., Werger M.J.A. and Ikusima I. (eds), Man's Impact on Vegetation. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  11. Bourke R.M. 1985. Food, coffee and casuarina: an agroforestry system from the Papua New Guinea highlands. Agroforest Syst 2: 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chase A.K. 1989. Domestication and domiculture in northern Australia: a social perspective. pp. 42–54. In: Harris D.R. and Hillman G.C. (eds), Foraging and Farming, the Evolution of Plant Extraction. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
  13. Chokkalingam U. and De Jong W. 2001. Secondary forest: a working definition and typology. Int For Rev 3: 19–26.Google Scholar
  14. Colfer C., Peluso N. and See Chung C. 1997. Beyond slash and burn: building on indigenous management of Borneo's tropical rain forests. New York Botanical Garden, USA, Advances in Economic Botany Vol. 11.Google Scholar
  15. De Jong W. 1995. Diversity, variation, and change in ribereno agriculture and agroforestry. Ph.D. dissertation, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 168 pp.Google Scholar
  16. De Jong W. 2002. Forest products and local forest management in West Kalimantan, Indonesia: implications for conservation and development. Tropenbos International, Wageningen, the Netherlands. Tropenbos-Kalimantan Series No. 6, 120 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Den Hertog W.H. and Wiersum K.F. 2000. Timur (Zanthoxylum armatum) production in Nepal, dynamics in nontimber forest resource management. Mountain Research and Development 20(2): 32–41.Google Scholar
  18. Denevan W.M., Treacy J.M., Alcorn J.B., Padoch C., Denslow J. and Paitan S.F. 1984. Indigenous agroforestry in the Peruvian Amazon: Bora Indian management of swidden fallows. Interciencia 9: 346–357.Google Scholar
  19. Ewel J.J., 1999. Natural systems as models for the design of sustainable systems of land use. Agroforest Syst 45: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fortmann L. and Bruce J.W. 1988. Whose Trees? Proprietary Dimensions of Forestry. Westview, Boulder and London, 135 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Fujisaka S. and Wollenberg E. 1991. From forest to agroforests and logger to agroforester: a case study. Agroforest Syst 14: 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilmour D.A. 1990. Resource availability and indigenous forest management systems in Nepal. Society and Natural Resources 3: 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gómez-Pompa A. and Kaus A. 1990. Traditional management of tropical forests in Mexico. pp. 45–64. In: Anderson A.B. (ed.), Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps towards Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest. Columbia University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Henkemans A., Persoon G.A. and Wiersum K.F. 2000. Landscape transformations of pioneer shifting cultivators at the forest fringe. pp. 53–69. In: Wiersum K.F. (ed.), Tropical forest resource Dynamics and Conservation: from Local to Global Issues. Wageningen University, The Netherlands, Tropical Resource Management Papers No. 33.Google Scholar
  25. Higman S., Bass S., Judd N., Mayers J. and Nussbaum R. 1999. The Sustainable Forestry Handbook. A Practical Guide for Tropical Forest Managers on Implementing New Standards. Earthscan Publications, London, UK, 289 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Hobbs R.J. and Morton S.R. 1999. Moving from descriptive to predictive ecology. Agrofor Syst 45: 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kessy J.F. 1998. Conservation and utilization of natural resources in the East Usambara Forest Reserves: conventional views and local perspectives. Wageningen Agricultural University, the Netherlands, Tropical Resource Management Papers No. 18, 168 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Landauer K. and Brazil M. (eds) 1990. Tropical Homegardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan, 257 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Lawrence A. (ed.) 2000. Forestry, Forest Users and Research: New Ways of Learning. European Tropical Forest Research Network, Wageningen, The Netherlands, ETFRN Series No. 1, 190 pp.Google Scholar
  30. Lefroy E.C., Hobbs R.J., O'Connor M.H. and Pate J.S. (eds) 1999. Agriculture as a mimic of natural ecosystems. Agroforest Syst 45: 1–436.Google Scholar
  31. Kumar M.B., Kumar S. and Mathew t. 1995. Floristic attributes of small cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton) growing areas in the Western Ghats of peninsular India. Agroforest Syst 31: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kumar B.M. and Nair P.K.R. 2004. The enigma of tropical homegardens (This volume).Google Scholar
  33. Mary F. and Michon G. 1987. When agroforests drive back natural forests: a socio-economic analysis of a rice-agroforestry system in Sumatra. Agroforest Syst 5: 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michon G. and De Foresta H. 1996. Agroforests as an alternative to pure plantations for the domestication and commercialization of NTFPs. pp. 160–175. In: Leakey R.R.B., Temu A.B., Melnyk M.and Vantomme P. (eds), Domestication and Commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products in Agroforestry Systems. FAO, Rome, Italy, Non-Wood Forest Products No. 9.Google Scholar
  35. Michon G. and De Foresta H. 1997. Agroforests: pre-domestication of forest trees or true domestication of forest ecosystems? Neth J Agr Sci 45: 451–462.Google Scholar
  36. Michon G. and De Foresta H. 1999. Agro-forests: incorporating a forest vision in agroforestry. pp. 381–406. In: Buck L.E., Lassoie J.P. and Fernandes E.C.M. (eds), Agroforestry in Sustainable Agricultural Systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  37. Muschler R. and Beer J. (eds) 2001. Multistrata agroforestry systems with perennial crops. Agroforest Syst 53: 85–245.Google Scholar
  38. Nair P.K.R. 2001. Do tropical homegardens elude science, or is it the other way around. Agroforest Syst 53: 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oduol P.A. and Aluma J.R.W. 1990. The banana (Musa spp.)-Coffee robusta traditional agroforestry system of Uganda. Agroforest Syst 11: 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oldeman R.A.A. 1983. The design of ecologically sound agroforests. pp. 173–207. In: Huxley P.A. (ed.), Plant Research in Agroforestry. International Council for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
  41. Olofsen H. 1980. An ancient social forestry. Sylvatrop, Philippines Forestry Research Journal 4: 255–262.Google Scholar
  42. Paudel S. and Wiersum K.F. 2002. Tenure arrangements and management intensity of Butter tree (Diploknema butyracea) in Makawanpur district, Nepal. Int Forestry Review 4: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Posey D.A. 1985. Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapó indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforest Syst 3: 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ros-Tonen M.A.F. (ed.) 1999. NTFP Research in the Tropenbos Programme: Results and Perspectives. Tropenbos Foundation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Salafsky N. 1995. Forest gardens in the Gunung Palung region of West Kalimantan, Indonesia: Defining a locally developed, market-oriented agroforestry system. Agroforest Syst 28: 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sayer J.A. and Campbell B. 2001. Research to integrate productivity enhancement, environmental protection, and human development. Conserv Ecol 5: 32 [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/.Google Scholar
  47. Teketay D. and Tegineh A. 1991. Traditional tree crop based agroforestry in coffee producing areas of Harerge, Eastern Ethiopia. Agroforest Syst 16: 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Torquebiau E. 1992. Are tropical agroforestry homegardens sustainable? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 41: 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Noordwijk M., Tomich T.P. and Verbist B. 2001. Negotiation support models for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest margins. Conserv Ecol 5(2): 21 [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art21.Google Scholar
  50. Van Noordwijk M., Tomich T.P., De Foresta H. and Michon G. 1997. To segregate-or to integrate: The question of balance between production and biodiversity conservation in complex agroforestry systems. Agroforest Today 8(1): 6–9.Google Scholar
  51. Warren D.M. 1991. Using Indigenous Knowledge in Agricultural Development. World Bank, Washington DC, USA, World Bank Discussion Paper No. 127, 46 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Wiersum K.F. 1982. Tree gardening and taungya on Java: examples of agroforestry techniques in the humid tropics. Agroforest Syst 1: 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiersum K.F. 1995. 200 years of sustainability in forestry: lessons from history. Environ Manage 19: 321–329.Google Scholar
  54. Wiersum K.F. 1996. Domestication of valuable tree species in agroforestry systems: evolutionary stages from gathering to breeding. pp. 147–158. In: Leakey R.R.B., Temu A.B., Melnyk M. and Vantomme P. (eds), Domestication and commercialization of Non-Timber Forest Products in Agroforestry Systems. FAO, Rome, Italy, Non-Wood Forest Products No. 9.Google Scholar
  55. Wiersum K.F. 1997a. Indigenous exploitation and management of tropical forest resources: an evolutionary continuum in forest-people interaction. Agr Ecosyst Environ 63: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiersum K.F. 1997b. From natural forest to tree crops, codomestication of forests and tree species, an overview. Neth J Agr Sci 45: 425–438.Google Scholar
  57. Wiersum K.F. 2003. Use and conservation of biodiversity in East African forested landscapes. In: Zuidema P. (ed.), Tropical Forests in Multi-functional Landscapes. Seminar Proceedings. Prins Bernard Centre, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (In press).Google Scholar
  58. Withrow-Robinson B., Hibbs D.E., Gypmantasiri P. and Thomas D. 1999. A preliminary classification of fruit-based agroforestry in a highland area of northern Thailand. Agroforest Syst 42: 195–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, London, UK, 383 pp.Google Scholar
  60. Zeven A.C. 1972. The partial and complete domestication of the oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Econ Bot 26: 274–279.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • K.F. Wiersum
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Department of Environmental SciencesWageningen UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations