Skip to main content
Log in

Contrastive Focus Reduplication in English (The Salad-Salad Paper)

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a phenomenon of colloquial English that we call Contrastive Reduplication (CR), involving the copying of words and sometimes phrases as in It's tuna salad, not SALAD-salad, or Do you LIKE-HIM-like him? Drawing on a corpus of examples gathered from natural speech, written texts, and television scripts, we show that CR restricts the interpretation of the copied element to a `real' or prototypical reading. Turning to the structural properties of the construction, we show that CR is unusual among reduplication phenomena in that whole idioms can be copied, object pronouns are often copied (as in the second example above), and inflectional morphology need not be copied. Thus the `scope' of CR cannot be defined in purely phonological terms; rather, a combination of phonological, morphosyntactic, syntactic, and lexical factors is involved. We develop an analysis within the parallel architecture framework of Jackendoff (1997, 2002), whereby CR is treated as a lexical item with syntactic and semantic content and reduplicative phonology. We then sketch an alternative analysis, based on current assumptions within the Minimalist Program, which involves movement into a focus-like position with both the head and the tail of the resulting chain spelled out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alboiu, Gabriela. 2000. The Features of Movement in Romanian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Manitoba.

  • Alderete, John, Jill Beckman, Laura Benua, Amalia Gnanadesikan, John McCarthy, and Suzanne Urbanczyk. 1999. 'Reduplication with Fixed Segmentism', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 327–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobalijk, Jonathan David. 2002. 'A-Chains at the PF-Interface: Copies and “Covert” Movement', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 197–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, Michael. 1995. 'Focus and Checking Theory', in I. Kenesei (ed.), Approaches to Hungarian V: Levels and Structures, Szeged: JATE, pp. 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnie, Andrew. 2000. 'On the Definition of X0 and XP', Syntax 3, 59–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. 'Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework', in R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka (eds.), Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 89–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déchaine, Rose-Marie, and Martina Wiltschko. 2002. 'Decomposing Pronouns', Linguistic Inquiry 33, 409–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sciullo, Anna Maria, and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dray, Nancy. 1987. Doubles and Modifiers in English, Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Chicago.

  • Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghomeshi, Jila. 1997. 'Non-projecting Nouns and the Ezafe Construction in Persian', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15, 729–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandgent, Charles H. 1908. An Introduction to Vulgar Latin, Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. 'Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection', in K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The View From Building 20, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haiman, John. 1991. 'Motivation, Repetition and Emancipation: The Bureaucratization of Language', in H. C. Wolfart, (ed.), Linguistic Studies Presented to John L. Finlay, Algonquian and Iroquoian Linguistics, Memoir 8, University of Manitoba, pp. 45–69.

  • Hayes, Bruce. 1989. 'The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter', in Paul Kiparsky and Gilbert Youmans, (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology, Volume 1: Rhythm and Meter, New York: Academic Press, pp. 201–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Lawrence. 1993. 'Economy and Redundancy in a Dualistic Model of Natural Language', in S. Shore and M. Vilkuna (eds.), SKY 1993, Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, pp. 31–72.

  • Inkelas, Sharon, and Cheryl Zoll. 2000. 'Reduplication as Morphological Doubling', ms., UC Berkeley and MIT. [Rutgers Optimality Archive, paper #412]

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Katalin. 1998. 'Identificational Focus versus Information Focus', Language 74, 245–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar, Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George. 1972. 'Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts', in Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 183–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. 'Pragmatic Halos', Language 75, 522–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepschy, Anna, and Giulio Lepschy. 1984. La Lingua Italiana, Milano: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidz, Jeffrey. 2001. 'Echo Reduplication in Kannada and the Theory of Word-Formation', The Linguistic Review 18, 375–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, Mark, and Alan Prince. 1977. 'On Linguistic Stress and Rhythm', Linguistic Inquiry 8, 249–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1982. 'Re Reduplication', Linguistic Inquiry 13, 483–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, Kazumi. 1997. 'Verb Raising in American Sign Language', Lingua 103, 127–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John, and Alan Prince. 1986. 'Prosodic Morphology', ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Brandeis University.

  • Moravcsik, Edith. 1978. 'Reduplicative Constructions', in Joseph H. Greenberg, (ed.), Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutaka, Ngessimo, and Larry M. Hyman. 1990. 'Syllables and Morpheme Integrity in Kinande Reduplication', Phonology 7, 73–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology, Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. 'On the Prosodic Representation of Clitics', in Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, Studia Grammatica 41, Berlin: Academie Verlag, pp. 102–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petronio, Karen. 1993. Clause Structure in American Sign Language, PhD Dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Petronio, Karen, and Diane Lillo-Martin. 1997. 'WH-movement and the Position of Spec-CP: Evidence from American Sign Language', Language 73, 18–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, William J. 1991. 'Ma', in Carol Georgopoulos and Roberta Ishihara (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 449–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Norvin. 1997. What Moves where and in which Language, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. 'The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery', in L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 281–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. 'Cognitive Reference Points', Cognitive Psychology 7, 532–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Nicole. to appear. 'Demonstrative Position in Michif', Canadian Journal of Linguistics.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth A. 1996. 'The Prosodic Structure of Function Words', in Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey and Susanne Urbanczyk, (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, pp. 439Ů469

  • Travis, Lisa. 1988. 'The Syntax of Adverbs', McGill Working Papers in Linguistics: Proceedings of the IVth Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax, pp. 280–310.

  • Travis, Lisa. 2001. 'The Syntax of Reduplication', in Minjoo Kim and Uri Strauss, (eds.), Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting (NELS 31), Amherst, MA: GLSA, pp. 455–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallduví, Enric. 1995. 'Structural Properties of Information Packaging in Catalan', in K. E. Kiss (ed.), Discourse Configurational Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 122–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Irene. 1990. 'The Clitic Group in Prosodic Phonology', in Joao Mascaro and Marina Nespor (eds.), Grammar in Progress, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1991. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction, Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ghomeshi, J., Jackendoff, R., Rosen, N. et al. Contrastive Focus Reduplication in English (The Salad-Salad Paper). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22, 307–357 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000015789.98638.f9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NALA.0000015789.98638.f9

Keywords

Navigation