Skip to main content

Are Chameleons Good Citizens? A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Self-Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Abstract

In this study the relationship between self-monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) was examined longitudinally among professional and managerial employees of a federal government research laboratory. Supervisory ratings of subordinates' OCBs were collected and matched with 172 subordinates' self-ratings of self-monitoring, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, perceived organizational support, and perceptions of job characteristics. One year later, supervisory ratings of subordinates' OCBs were again collected. Support was found for the hypothesis that individuals high in self-monitoring are more likely to perform OCBs which are other-directed. Implications for management and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Baron, R. A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the Type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 281-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. (1983). Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.” Academy of Management Journal, 26, 587-595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, T. E. (1992). Foci and bases of commitment: Are they distinctions worth making? Academy of Management Journal, 35, 232-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolino, M. C. (1999). Citizenship and impression management: Good soldiers or good actors? Academy of Management Review, 24, 82-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, D. F., & O'Reilly, C. A., III. (1982). Boundary spanning and individual performance: The impact of self-monitoring. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 124-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, G. H., Long, W. S., & Dedrick, E. J. (1990). The role of self-monitoring and gender on leader emergence: A laboratory and field study. Journal of Management, 16, 609-618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hitchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J. L., Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1990). Accounting for Organizational citizenship behavior: Leader fairness and task scope versus satisfaction. Journal of Management, 16, 705-721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 47, 73-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (1989). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, operationalization, and validation. Unpublished manuscript, Loyola University of Chicago.

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, C., Lam, S.K., & Law, K.S. (2000). Instrumental values of organizational citizenship behavior for promotion: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85, 822-828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., & Day, D. V. (1994). Do chameleons get ahead? The effects of self-monitoring on managerial careers. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1047-1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Folger, R. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims' layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 630-650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konovsky, M. A., & Organ, D. W. (1996). Dispositional and contextual determinants of Organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 253-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. E. (1987). Are good teachers perceived as high self-monitors? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 64-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low selfmonitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 121-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the “side bet theory” of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In: Magnusson, D. and Endler, N. S. (Eds.), Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 333-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and Organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1992). A preliminary report on a new measure of Organizational citizenship behavior. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, Valdosta, GA, pp. 185-187.

  • Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and Organizational citizenship behavior? A group value model explanation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R.H., & Harland, L.K. (2002). Temporary employees as good citizens: Factors influencing their OCB performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 171-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, G.A., & Kickul, J.R. (1998). Organizational citizenship behaviors: Achievement orientation and personality. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 263-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of Organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775-802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rioux, S.M., & Penner, L.A. (2001). The causes of organizational citizenship behavior: A motivational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1306-1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J.R. (2002). Work values and organizational citizenship behaviors: Values that work for employees and organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 123-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settoon, R.P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 219-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, L. M., & Wayne, S. J. (1993). Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 774-780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 653-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1974). The self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M. (1987). Public appearances/ private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 125-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnley, W. H., & Bolino, M. C. (2001). Achieving desired images while avoiding undesired images: Exploring the role of self-monitoring in impression management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 351-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. (1994). Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 765-802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M. E., & Cummings, L. L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 3-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S.L., & Rush, M.C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: Context, disposition, and age. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 379-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: A review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1: 145-169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald L. Blakely.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blakely, G.L., Andrews, M.C. & Fuller, J. Are Chameleons Good Citizens? A Longitudinal Study of the Relationship Between Self-Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology 18, 131–144 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027388729390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027388729390

  • OCB
  • self-monitoring
  • job satisfaction
  • commitment
  • organizational support