Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Continuous Dependent Variables and Organizational Ecology: Toward a more Perfect Union

  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I review all previously published organizational ecology research which utilizes continuous dependent variables. I unearth twenty-one such studies, half of which were published within the past four years. The broadening array of dependent variables in this field is a most welcome development. However, each of these papers has at least one methodological limitation, in specification of cross-unit effects and/or controls for autocorrelation. Perhaps the most serious problem is the assertion that the fixed effects research design solves the problem of autocorrelation. I demonstrate that this assertion is untrue. I conclude with advice on the proper way to model continuous dependent variables in organizational ecology research, as follows: (1) Consider omitting all organizations which do not exist for more time periods than the number of independent variables. (2) Test for autocorrelation, report the results, and correct for autocorrelation if the test indicates that it is a problem. (3) Use a fixed effects model, and justify it based on the nonrandomness of the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amburgey, T. L. & Rao, H. (1996). Organizational ecology: Past, present, and future directions. Academy of Management Journal 39: 1265–1286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. P. & Carroll, G. R. (1987). Competition and mutualism among early telephone companies. Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 400–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. P., Grieve, H. R. & Park, D. Y. (1994). An evolutionary model of organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal 15: 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, D. N. (1999). The structuring of organizational populations. American Sociological Review 64: 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, D., West, E. & Hannan, M. T. (1994). A time to grow and a. time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. American Journal of Sociology 100: 381–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C. & Mezias, S. J. (1993). Competition, institutional linkages, and organizational growth. Social Science Research 22: 131–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergh, D.D. (1993). Don't 'waste' your time! The effects of time series errors in management research: The case of ownership concentration and research and development spending. Journal of Management 19: 897–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S. & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical Linear Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. L. (1999). To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management Journal 20: 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dielman, T. (1989). Pooled Cross-Sectional and Time Series Data Analysis. New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 504–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farnum, N. R. & Stanton, L. W. (1989) Quantitative Forecasting Methods. Boston: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. C. (1976). Homicide in Detroit: The role of firearms. Criminology 14: 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (1999a). Branch systems and nonlocal learning in populations. Advances in Strategic Management 16: 57–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (1999b). The effect of core change on performance: Inertia and regression toward the mean. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 590–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N. (1988). Basic Econometrics, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82: 929–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. & Young, A. A. (1977). Estimation in panel models: Results on pooling cross-sections and time series. In: D. R. Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 52–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A. (1992). Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental transformation. Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 48–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A. (1995). The demographic metabolism of organizations: Industry dynamics, turnover, and tenure distributions. Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 586–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. D. (1999). Firm strategy and age dependence: A contingent view of the liabilities of newness, adolescence, and obsolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 281–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, M. W. & Anderson, P. C. (1996). Generational technological change: Effects of innovation and local rivalry on performance. Academy of Management Journal 39: 1185–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polodny, J. M., Stuart, T. E. & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry, 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology 102: 659– 689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranger-Moore, J., Breckenridge, R. S. & Jones, D. L. (1995). Patterns of growth and size-localized competition in the New York state life insurance industry, 1860–1985. Social Forces 73: 1027– 1049.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., & Scott, W. R. (1998). A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 877–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, R. (2001). Organizational growth and ecological constraints: The growth of social movements in Sweden, 1881 to 1940. American Sociological Review 66: 672–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayrs, L. (1989). Pooled Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, R. K. & Noble, C. H. (1997). The performance consequences of subfield entry. Strategic Management Journal 18: 465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J. B. (1999). Executive migration and interorganizational competiton. Social Science Research 28: 289–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, N. B. & Hannan, M. T. (1984). Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vekstein, D. (1998). Managing knowledge and corporate performance: An empirical analysis of the world automobile industry. Omega 26: 551–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E. J., Kraatz, M. S. & Bresser, R. K. F. (2000). Modeling the dynamics of strategic fit: A normative approach to strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 21: 429–453.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Rowan University, 201 Mullica Hill Road, Glassboro, NJ, 08028, U.S.A

    Joel P. Rudin

Authors
  1. Joel P. Rudin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rudin, J.P. Continuous Dependent Variables and Organizational Ecology: Toward a more Perfect Union. Quality & Quantity 37, 435–442 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027366213374

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027366213374

Search

Navigation