Abstract
This exploratory study investigated perceptions of and relationship with professional ethics of therapists-in-training. A focus group of marriage and family therapy doctoral students explored self-awareness and “at-risk” behaviors regarding ethical competence and compliance. A grounded theory analysis of data is presented as a conditional matrix, which offers a theory of development between therapists and their perception of ethics. The Practitioner-Relationship Ethics Model represents findings of interaction between confidence in ethical principles, field experience, use of justification, and at-risk behaviors. Implications and limitations of these findings are presented, as are suggestions for research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy. (1982). AAMFT code of ethical principles, for marriage and family therapists. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy. (2001). User's guide to the AAMFT code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.
Bernstein, B. (1982). Values, ethics, legalities and the family therapist: VI. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. In J. Hansen & L. L'Abate (Eds.), Values, ethics, legalities, and the family therapist (pp. 87–102). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications.
Bischoff, R. J., Barton, M., Thober, J., & Hawley, R. (2002). Events and experiences impacting the development of clinical self-confidence: A study of the first year of client contact. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 371–382.
Boss, P. G., & Weiner, J. P. (1988). Rethinking assumptions about women's development and family therapy. In C.J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions: Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 235–251). New York: Guilford Press.
Brock, G. (1997). Reducing vulnerability to ethics code violations: An at-risk test for marriage and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23, 87–89.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Doherty, W. J., & Boss, P. G. (1991). Values and ethics in family therapy. In A. S. Gurman & D. P. Kniskern (Eds.), Handbook of family therapy, Vol. II (pp. 606–637). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Grosser, G., & Paul, N. (1964). Ethical issues in family group therapy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 34, 875–884.
Haley, J. (1976). Problem solving therapy. New York: Harper & Row.
Hare-Mustin, R. (1978). A feminist approach to family therapy. Family Process, 17, 181–194.
Kaslow, F.W.,& Steinberg, J.L. (1982). Values, ethics, legalities and the family therapist: IV. Ethical divorce therapy and divorce proceedings: A psycholegal perspective. In J. Hansen & L. L'Abate (Eds.), Values, ethics, legalities, and the family therapist (pp. 61–74). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications.
Korzybski, A. (1958). Science and sanity: An introduction to non-Aristotelian system and general semantics (4th ed.). Lake Shore, CT: Institute of General Semantics.
Krasner, L., & Houts, A.C. (1984). A study of the “value” systems of behavioral scientists. American Psychologist, 38, 840–850.
Margolin, G. (1982). Ethical and legal considerations in marriage and family therapy. American Psychologist, 7, 789–801.
Moon, S., Dillon, D., & Sprenkle, D. (1990). Family therapy and qualitative research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 357–376.
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Piercy, F., & Deacon, S. (1998). Qualitative evaluation of human service programs.Unpublished Manual, Center for Families, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Piercy, F., Moon, S., & Bischof, G. (1994). Difficult journal article rejections among Prolific family therapists: A qualitative critical incident study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 20, 231–245.
Sporakowski, M. (1982). Values, ethics, legalities and the family therapist: VIII. The regulation of marital and family therapy. In J. Hansen & L. L'Abate (Eds.), Values, ethics, legalities, and the family therapist (pp. 125–134). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publications.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Todd, T. C. and Storm, C. L. (1997). The complete systemic supervisor. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Woody, R.,& Woody J. (Eds.). (2001). Ethics in marriage and family therapy. Washington, DC: American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McLaurin, S.L., Ricci, R.J. Ethical Issues and At-Risk Behaviors in Marriage and Family Therapy: A Qualitative Study of Awareness. Contemporary Family Therapy 25, 453–466 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027364804008
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027364804008