Abstract
The US academic profession is currently under considerable pressure due to a complex array of demographic, economic, social, and technological developments. The profession has recently witnessed major shifts in the areas of assessment and accountability, governance and power, faculty roles and functions, and recruitment patterns. This article examines a number of key policy dilemmas and challenges taking place in the profession owing to these developments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AAUP's Committee Z (2000). ‘More good news, so why the blues?’ Academe 86(2), 1–37.
Ackerman, J. (2000). ‘Cyberspace U’,The Boston Globe, August 25, F1.
Altbach, P.G. (1997). ‘Problems and possibilities: The US academic profession’,in Altbach, P.G. and Finkelstein, M.J. (eds), The Academic Profession: The Professoriate in Crisis. New York: Garland Publishing.
Baldwin, Roger G. (1990). ‘Faculty career stages and implications for professional develop-ment’,in Schuster, Jack H., Wheeler, Daniel and Associates (eds), Enhancing Faculty Careers: Strategies for Development and Renewal. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Ben-David, J. (1972). Trends in American Higher Education. Chicago: Chicago Press.
Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. New Jersey: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyer, E. (1997). ‘Prologue: Scholarship – A personal journey’,in Glassick, Charles E., Huber, Mary Taylor and Maeroff, Gene I. (eds.), Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers, pp. 1–3.
Braxton, J.M. (1996). Faculty Teaching and Research: Is There a Conflict? San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Byrne, J.P. (1997). Academic Freedom Without Tenure? AAHE New Pathways Working Paper Series, no. 5. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Chait, R. (1998). Ideas in Incubation: Three Possible Modifications to Traditional Tenure Policies. AAHE New Pathways Working Paper Series, no. 9. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Chait, R. and Trower, Cathy A. (1997). Where Tenure Does Not Reign: College Without Contract Systems. AAHE New Pathways Working Paper Series, no. 3. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Chronister, J.L., Baldwin, R.G. and Bailey, T. (1992). ‘Full time non-tenure-track faculty: Current status, condition, and attitudes’,Review of Higher Education 15, 383–400.
Clark, B. (1997). ‘Small worlds, different worlds: The uniqueness and troubles of American academic professions’,Daedalus 126(4), 21–42.
Fairweather, J.S. (1996). Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Finkelstein, M.J., Seal, R.K. and Schuster, J.H. (1998). The New Academic Generation: A Profession in Transformation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hurd, R. and Foerster, A. (1997). Directory of Faculty Contracts and Bargaining Agents in Institutions of Higher Education, 22. New York: The National Center for the Study of Collective Bargaining in Higher Education and the Professions, School of Public Affairs, Baruch College, The City University of New York.
Ikenberry, S.O. (1999). ‘The university and the information age’,in Hirsch, W.Z. and Weber, L.E. (eds), Challenges Facing Higher Education at the Millennium. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Oryx Press, pp. 56–64.
Johnstone, B. (1991). ‘The costs of education’,in Altbach, P.G. (ed.), International Higher Education: An Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing, pp. 59–89.
Layzell, D.T. (1999). ‘Higher education's changing environment: Faculty productivity and the reward structure’,in Tierney, W.G. (ed.), Faculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions, and Issues. New York: Falmer Press.
Leatherman, C. (1999). ‘Growth in positions off the tenure track is a trend that's here to stay, study finds,’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 9 April, A14.
Levine, A. (1997). ‘How the academic profession is changing’,Daedalus 126(4), 1–20.
Lewis, L.S. (1998). Scaling the Ivory Tower: Merit and Its Limits in Academic Careers.New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Licata, C.M. (1998). ‘Post-tenure review: At the crossroads of accountability and opportunity’,AAHE Bulletin, June, 3–6.
Licata, C.M. (2000). ‘How post-tenure review became law: Inside the legislative process in Arizona and Texas,’ AAHE Bulletin, April, 1–4.
Light, D.W., Marsden, L.R. and Corl, T.C. (1972). ‘The impact of the academic revolution on faculty careers’,AAHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 10. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Mahoney, R.J. (1997). ‘“Reinventing” the university: Object lessons from big business’,Chronicle of Higher Education, October 17, p. B4.
McPherson, Michael S. and Schapiro, M.O. (1999). ‘Tenure issues in higher education’,Journal of Economic Perspectives (13)1, 85–98.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1996). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1998a). Digest of Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (http://nces.ed/gov/pubs99/digest)
National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) (1998b). Fall Staff in Postsecondary Institutions, 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Poch, R.K. (1993). Academic Freedom in American Higher Education: Rights, Responsibil-ities, and Limitations. ASHE-ERIC Education Report no. 4. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
Rhodes, F.H.T. (1999). ‘The new university’,in Hirsch, W.Z. and Weber, L.E. (eds), Chal-lenges Facing Higher Education at the Millennium. American Council on Education, Oryx Press, pp. 167–174.
Rice, R.E. (1996). Making a Place for the New American Scholar. AAHE New Path-ways Working Paper Series, no. 1. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Schuster, J.H. (1995). ‘Whither the faculty? The changing academic labor market’,Educational Record, Fall, 28–33.
Shils, E. (1975). ‘The academic ethos under strain’,Minerva 13, 1–37.
Trow, M. (1997). ‘The development of information technology in American higher education’,Daedalus 126(4), 293–314.
Trower, C.A. (1996). Tenure Snapshot. AAHE New Pathways Working Paper Series, no. 2. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
Trower, C.A. (2000). The Faculty Recruitment Study. Cambridge: Project on Faculty Appoint-ments, Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Zemsky, R. and Massy, W.F. (1995). ‘Expanding perimeters, melting cores, and sticky functions: Toward an understanding of our current predicaments’,Change, Nov/Dec., 43–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honan, J.P., Teferra, D. The US academic profession: Key policy challenges. Higher Education 41, 183–203 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026735317457
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026735317457